The week's pick
Random Articles
Reseach Article
Development of E-Learning Content and Delivery for Self-Learning Environment Action Case Study at Martyrs of Uganda RCJHS
| International Journal of Computer Applications |
| Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA |
| Volume 181 - Number 18 |
| Year of Publication: 2018 |
| Authors: Christiana Vormawor, Ussiph Najim, Nuku Atta Kordzo Abiew, Baffour Owusu Sekyere |
10.5120/ijca2018917870
|
Christiana Vormawor, Ussiph Najim, Nuku Atta Kordzo Abiew, Baffour Owusu Sekyere . Development of E-Learning Content and Delivery for Self-Learning Environment Action Case Study at Martyrs of Uganda RCJHS. International Journal of Computer Applications. 181, 18 ( Sep 2018), 31-42. DOI=10.5120/ijca2018917870
Abstract
Advances in communication technologies have provided alternative ways to deliver instruction to students. With the advernt of the Internet as a learning tool, educators are able to use this instrument for course delivery. Information and Communications Technology (ICT) in developing countries like Ghana is considered to be essential in order to overcome the challenges that are hindering the country from developing in all sectors and also to reduce the digital break up in the Ghanaian society. As ICT is becoming more and more integrated in societies worldwide, its effects are clearly seen i.e. on peoples’ lives, and on countries’ economies in terms of opening doors to new opportunities and changing how people learn. In today’s business and academic environment, Information Technology have become an inseparable part of many modern institutions. An effectively implemented IT solution and innovation may not only enable smooth operations, but also significantly improve the management processes. Unfortunately, despite the remarkable benefits brought by IT solutions and innovations, the Ministry of Education and the Ghana Education Service (GES) are yet to embrace and integrate this new emerging techniques into their educational curriculum in order to improve upon the teaching and learning in the country. This research aimed at examining the use of ICT tools in basic schools, particularly in the development of E-Learning content and delivery for self-learning environments.
References
- Ussiph N, 2012. Using a Virtual Learning Environment to Support Teaching and Learning, and to Bridge the Digital Divide between Urban and Rural Communities in Ghana, PhD thesis University of Salford, Manchester.
- Gunasekaran, Ronald D, McNeil, Dennis Shaul,2002. E‐learning: research and applications, Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol 34 Issue 2, page 44-53
- Alexander S. 2001. E-Learning Developments and Experiences, Education & Training, Vol 43, No. 4-5, pages 240-248.
- Kanuka, H. 2006. Instructional Design and E-learning: A Discussion of Pedogogical Content Knowledge as a Missing Construct, E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, Vol 9 , No 6
- Horton W. 2001. Leading E-Learning , American Socienty for Traininbg and Development, Websit URL: http://www.elearninggurus.com/articles.html.
- Hadjerrouit, S. 2007. Applying a System Development Approach to Translate Educational Requirements Into e-Learning, Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, Vol 3,2007
- Siemens, G. &Yurkiw, S. (2003). The Role of the Learner in e-Learning In G. M. Piskurich (Ed.), Preparing Learners for e-Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass / Pfeiffer
- Holmes, B. & Gardner, J. (2008).e-Learning Concept and Practice. London: Sage
- Govindaswamy, T. (2002). “Successful Implementation of e-Learning Pedagogical Considerations”, Internet and Higher Education Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 287-299.
- Harold, B. Jeff, L.1995. Don’t Let Technology Pass You By, ABA Banking Journal, Box 986, Omaha, NE, page 73.
- Chao Boon Teo, Robert Kheng Leng Gay (2005b). “Personalization Issues in E-Learning,” WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, Issue 10, Volume 2, , ISSN 1790-0832, pp. 1514 – 1522, October 2005.
- Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russel, J. D. and Smaldino, S. E. (2002), “Instructional Media and Technologies for learning”, 7th edition, Merrill Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-030536-7.
- Diaz, D. P. and Bontenbal, K. F. (2000), “Pedagogy-Based Technology Training”,In P. Hoffman, and D. Lemke (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in a Network World, Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press, pp. 50-44.
- Kirschner, P. A. (2006), “Learning is Interaction”, Utrecht: 2006, 26 Pages Including References and Notes ISBN 90-9020572-1.
- Olgren, C. H. (1998), “Improving Learning Outcomes: The Effects of Learning Strategies and Motivation”, In C. Gibson (Ed.) Distance Learners in Higher Education: Institutional Responses for Quality Outcomes pp. 77-95, Madison, WI: Atwood.
- Klein, H., & Myers, M. D. (1999).A Set of Principles For Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies In Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23(No. 1), 67-94.
- Mayer, R. (2004), “Should There be a Three-Strike Rule against Pure Discovery of Learning? The Case for Guided Methods of Instruction”, American Psychologist 59 (1), pp. 14-19.
- McNiff, J. & White, J. (2010) You and your action research project, 3rd ed. Oxon: Rougledge.
- Myers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative Research in Information Systems.MIS Quarterly 21(2)
- Cisco Systems, Inc (2000) “Reusable Learning Object Strategy – Definition, Creation process andGuidelines for Building”. Version 3.1, April 22, 2000.
- Lincoln, Y. S., &Guba, E. G. (1985).Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Koohang, A. (2004) “Creating Learning Objects in Collaborative e-Learning settings”, Issues inInformation Systems Vol. 4 (2), pp 584-590
- Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 50-60. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/3_2/tam.html.
- Valiathan, P. (2002), “Blended Learning Models. Learning Circuits”, ASTD, Website URL: http://learningcircuits.org/2002/aug2002/valiathan.html
- Klein, HK. Myers, MD. (1999), ‘A classification scheme for interpretive research in information systems’, Qualitative research in IS: issues and trends, Idea Group Publishing, Herschey PA, pp. 218–239.
- Savenye, WC. Robinson, RS.(1996), “Qualitative issues and methods: An introduction for educational technologists, IAP, Carolina.
- Schwandt, T.A. (2000). “Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics and social constructionism. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed, pp189-213), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Holliday, A.(2007), “Doing and Writing Qualitative Research, Second Edition, SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.
- Chua, W. F. (1986),”Radical Developments in Accounting Thought”. The Accounting Review. 61(4): pp.601-632.
- Orlikowski, W.J. Baroudi, J.J. (1991), “Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research 2(1), 1–28.
- Creswell, J.W.(1998), “Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, Choosing Among Five Approaches” SAGE Publication, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Morgan, G. & Smircich, L.(1980) “ The Case of Qualitative Research”. Pennsylvania State University.
- Strauss, A & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Index Terms
Keywords