CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Evaluation of Structural Ontology Alignment Techniques

by Nouman Khan, Sadaqat Jan, M. Sohail Nisar
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 180 - Number 5
Year of Publication: 2017
Authors: Nouman Khan, Sadaqat Jan, M. Sohail Nisar
10.5120/ijca2017916035

Nouman Khan, Sadaqat Jan, M. Sohail Nisar . Evaluation of Structural Ontology Alignment Techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications. 180, 5 ( Dec 2017), 33-37. DOI=10.5120/ijca2017916035

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2017916035,
author = { Nouman Khan, Sadaqat Jan, M. Sohail Nisar },
title = { Evaluation of Structural Ontology Alignment Techniques },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Dec 2017 },
volume = { 180 },
number = { 5 },
month = { Dec },
year = { 2017 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 33-37 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume180/number5/28799-2017916035/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2017916035 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:59:50.940332+05:30
%A Nouman Khan
%A Sadaqat Jan
%A M. Sohail Nisar
%T Evaluation of Structural Ontology Alignment Techniques
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 180
%N 5
%P 33-37
%D 2017
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Specialists in the field of software engineering and particularly Ontology Engineers have proposed and executed different matching strategies to connect the semantic crevice between heterogeneous Ontologies. In any case, more change and examination is required in these strategies with a specific end goal to accomplish better recall & precision for the alignment sets. This thesis presents alignment of structural Ontologies which utilizes matcher to guide entities of two unique Ontologies. Falcon AO, RiMOM and few other matchers are utilized for comparing structural similarity among entities in mapping procedure. The results obtained are assessed for recall & precision and also compared with the given reference Ontologies. The result shows that RiMOM and LILY lead the list in alignment precision, but if Recall is considered then ASMOV is leading the list of matchers considered.

References
  1. Berners-Lee, Tim, James Hendler, and Ora Lassila. "The semantic web." Scientific American 284.5 (2001): 28-37.
  2. AH Doan, J Madhavan, P Domingos, A Halevy, "Learning to map between Ontologies on the semantic web.," in In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web,pp. 662-673. ACM, Chicago, 2002..
  3. Holi, Markus, and Eeru Hyvönen. "A method for modeling uncertainty in semantic web taxonomies." Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters. ACM, 2004
  4. Decker, Stefan, Frank Van Harmelen, and Jeen Broekstra. "The semantic Web-on the respective Role of XML and RDF."
  5. McGuinness, Deborah L., and Frank Van Harmelen. "OWL web ontology language overview." W3C recommendation 10.10 (2004): 2004.
  6. Shvaiko, Pavel, and Jérôme Euzenat. "Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges." IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering 25.1 (2013): 158-176.
  7. Xu, Tianren, and Tianwei Xu. "An approach for ontology mapping based on semantic and structural information in Ontologies." Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII), 2010 International Conference on. Vol. 3. IEEE, 2010..
  8. Leung, Nelson KY, et al. "Ontology matching techniques: a 3-tier classification framework." (2009)..
  9. Del Vescovo, Chiara, et al. "The modular structure of an ontology: Atomic decomposition." IJCAI Proceedings-International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 22. No. 3. 2011
  10. Li, Juanzi, et al. "RiMOM: A dynamic multistrategy ontology alignment framework." IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 21.8 (2009): 1218-1232.
  11. Wang, Peng, and Baowen Xu. "LILY: the results for the ontology alignment contest OAEI 2007." Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ontology Matching-Volume 304. CEUR-WS. org, 2007.
  12. Kengue, Jean François Djoufak, Jérôme Euzenat, and Petko Valtchev. "OLA in the OAEI 2007 evaluation contest." Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ontology Matching-Volume 304. CEUR-WS. org, 2007.
  13. J. Euzenat and P.Valtchev. "Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-lite"In Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), 333–337, 2004.
  14. Jean-Mary, Yves R., and Mansur R. Kabuka. "ASMOV results for OAEI 2007." Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ontology Matching-Volume 304. CEUR-WS. org, 2007.
  15. Jean-Mary, Yves, and Mansur Kabuka. "Asmov: Ontology alignment with semantic validation." Joint SWDB-ODBIS Workshop on Semantics, Ontologies, Databases, Vienna, Austria, 15–20, 2007.
  16. Ehrig, Marc, and Steffen Staab. "QOM–quick ontology mapping." International Semantic Web Conference. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004.
  17. Jian, Ningsheng, et al. "Falcon-ao: Aligning Ontologies with falcon." Workshop on Integrating Ontologies (K-CAP 2005). 2005.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Evaluation Alignment Ontology Structural Alignment