CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Instructors’ Usage and Perceptions of Mobile Devices and Applications

by Asaad Alzayed, Bander Alraqqas, Rana Al-Hajri, Yousef Alkhawari
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 180 - Number 23
Year of Publication: 2018
Authors: Asaad Alzayed, Bander Alraqqas, Rana Al-Hajri, Yousef Alkhawari
10.5120/ijca2018916119

Asaad Alzayed, Bander Alraqqas, Rana Al-Hajri, Yousef Alkhawari . Instructors’ Usage and Perceptions of Mobile Devices and Applications. International Journal of Computer Applications. 180, 23 ( Feb 2018), 15-19. DOI=10.5120/ijca2018916119

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2018916119,
author = { Asaad Alzayed, Bander Alraqqas, Rana Al-Hajri, Yousef Alkhawari },
title = { Instructors’ Usage and Perceptions of Mobile Devices and Applications },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Feb 2018 },
volume = { 180 },
number = { 23 },
month = { Feb },
year = { 2018 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 15-19 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume180/number23/29071-2018916119/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2018916119 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:01:32.271430+05:30
%A Asaad Alzayed
%A Bander Alraqqas
%A Rana Al-Hajri
%A Yousef Alkhawari
%T Instructors’ Usage and Perceptions of Mobile Devices and Applications
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 180
%N 23
%P 15-19
%D 2018
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Mobile technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in Higher Educational Institutions, and accordingly, educators must embrace and capitalize on the use of this technology to focus on integrated student services, and to enhance knowledge sharing activities in and off campus. This study investigated instructors’ usage and perceptions of mobile devices, its functions, native capabilities, and applications. A sample of 48 instructors were involved in this investigation at the college of Business Studies (CBS), a HE institution in Kuwait. The aim of this study is to understand instructors’ habits of the use of mobile capabilities and functions, as well as a common use of social media applications. The finding indicated instructors’ frequent use of most of mobile functions, as well as the frequent use of social media applications such as twitter, YouTube, Instagram, and Snap Chat. This will guide the developers of mobile applications for CBS, and help them help to effectively utilize mobile capabilities, functions, and applications.

References
  1. Al-Hunaiyyan, S. Al-Sharhan and R. Alhajri, “A New Mobile Learning Model in the Context of the Smart Classrooms Environment: A Holistic Approach.,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM). Vol.11_No.3(2017), pp. 39-56, 2017.
  2. P. Berking, M. Birtwhistle, S. Gallagher and J. Haag, “Mobile Learning Survey Report,” Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative, 2013.
  3. A. Nassuora, “Students Acceptance of Mobile Learning for Higher Education in Saudi Arabia,” International Journal of Learning Management Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2013.
  4. T. Wilen-Daugenti and A. McKee, “Dual-mode phones: A smart call for higher education, 1-12. www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/docs/wp/ Dual_Mode_Phones_WP_0808a.pd,” Cisco, 2008.
  5. Santos, O. Bocheco and C. Habak, “A survey of student and instructor perceptions of personal mobile technology usage and policies for the classroom,” Education and Information Technologies. July 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-017-9625-y, 2017.
  6. E. W. Baker, S. S. Al-Gahtani and G. S. Hubona, “The effects of gender and age on new technology implementation in a developing country: Testing the theory of planned behavior (TPB),” Information Technology & People, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 352–375, 2007.
  7. Kuwait Telecommunications Report Q4, from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/3388100/kuwait-telecommunications-report-q4-2015, Kuwait, 2015.
  8. A. Lenhart, “Cell phones and American adults.,” Pew Research Center, Accessed 10 August 2017. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2010/09/02/cell-phones-and-american-adults/, 2010.
  9. Synovate , “Global mobile phone survey shows the mobile is a ‘remote control’ for life,,” Synovate survey. Accessed 18 August 2017. Retrieved from https://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=103030, 2009.
  10. S. Almutairy, T. Davies and W. Dimitriadi, “The Readiness of Applying M-Learning among Saudi Arabian Students at Higher Education,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies iJIM, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 33-36, 2015.
  11. G. Kennedy, B. Dalgarno, S. Bennett, T. Judd and R. Chang, “Immigrants and natives: investigating differences between staff and students’ use of technology,” in Proceeding of the 25th annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE), Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia, 2008.
  12. G. Kennedy, S. Judd, A. Churchward and K. Gary, “First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives?,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24: , pp. 108-122, 2008.
  13. M. Bayless, T. Clipson and S. Wilson, “Faculty Perceptions and Policies of Students’ Use of Personal Technology in the Classroom,” Steven Austin State University. Faculty Publications.Paper 32 Retrived from:. http://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/businesscom_facultypubs/3, Texas, 2013.
  14. A. Forkosh-Baruch, and H. eishar-Tal, “Proactive, preventive or indifference? Reaction modes of faculty towards use of personal mobile devices in courses,” International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 8(2), doi:10.4018/IJMBL.20160401, p. 72–84, 2016.
  15. M. Abbad, D. Morris and C. de Nahlik, “Looking under the Bonnet: Factors Affecting Student Adoption of E-Learning Systems in Jordan,” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, vol. 10, pp. 10-20, 2009.
  16. O'bannon and K. Thomas, “Teacher perceptions of using mobile phones in the classroom: Age matters!,” Computers & Education, 74. Retrieved from: http://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/businesscom_facultypubs/32/, p. 15–25, 2014.
  17. F. N. Al-Fahad, “Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia,” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 111-119, 2009.
  18. A. Kafyulilo, “Access, use and perceptions of teachers and students towards mobile phones as a tool for teaching and learning in Tanzania,” Journal Education and Information Technologies. Volume 19 Issue 1, March 2014, pp. 115-127, 2014.
  19. Elliot and W. Woodward, Statistical Analysis Quick Reference Guidebook: With SPSS Examples. First Edition, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 2007.
  20. Al-Hunaiyyan, R. Alhajri and S. Al-Sharhan, “ Perceptions and challenges of mobile learning in Kuwait,” Al-Hunaiyyan, A. Alhajri, R. Al-Sharhan, S. (2016). Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.12.001, 2016.
  21. K. Alhazmi and A. A. Rahman, “Facebook in Higher Education: Students’ Use and Perceptions,” AISS: Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences, vol. 5, pp. 32 - 41, 2013.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Mobile technology Mobile usage Mobile Functions.

Powered by PhDFocusTM