We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Reseach Article

Ontology Alignment with FOAM++

by AbdulHameed Haddad, Akram Selah
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 18 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: AbdulHameed Haddad, Akram Selah
10.5120/2305-2435

AbdulHameed Haddad, Akram Selah . Ontology Alignment with FOAM++. International Journal of Computer Applications. 18, 8 ( March 2011), 14-20. DOI=10.5120/2305-2435

@article{ 10.5120/2305-2435,
author = { AbdulHameed Haddad, Akram Selah },
title = { Ontology Alignment with FOAM++ },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2011 },
volume = { 18 },
number = { 8 },
month = { March },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 14-20 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume18/number8/2305-2435/ },
doi = { 10.5120/2305-2435 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:05:48.343406+05:30
%A AbdulHameed Haddad
%A Akram Selah
%T Ontology Alignment with FOAM++
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 18
%N 8
%P 14-20
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The rapid use of ontology in distributed systems as a knowledge representation mechanism, has led to a demand for ontology alignment process due to the heterogeneity arising between two or more ontology describing the same domain. Although many alignments tools have been proposed to reinforce the interoperability between different ontologies, most of them use fixed weights ,supplied by domain experts, in order to rate between similarity measures of two ontological entities. In this work we present FOAM++. It is a framework implemented as a java API, which aims to enhance the quality of ontology alignment process. in order to apply our method, we have extended FOAM API utilizing one of its prototypes(NOM). Our alignment method benefits from soft computing (Genetic Algorithms) methodologies in order to learn the used weights dynamically.

References
  1. T. Gruber, “A translation approach to portable ontology specification,”Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 199–220, 1993.
  2. M. Paolucci, T. Kawamura, T. Payne, and K. Sycara, “Semantic matching of web service capabilities,” ISWC. Springer, pp. 333–347, 2002.
  3. E. Jrme and S. Pavel, “Ontology matching,” Springer-Verlag, Heildelberg(DE), 2007.
  4. A. Valarakos, V. Spiliopoulos, K. Kotis, and G. Vouros, “Automs-f: A java framework for synthesizing ontology mapping method,” Springer-Verlag, Heildelberg (DE), 2007.
  5. S. Massmann, D. Engmann, and E. Rahm, “Coma++: Results for the ontology alignment contest oaei,” 2009.
  6. X. Zhang1, Q. Zhong1, J. Li, J. Tang, and G. a. L. Xie, “Rimom results for oaei,” 2009.
  7. J. Martinez-Gil, E. Alba, and J. Aldana-Montes, “Optimizing ontology alignments by using genetic algorithms,” Knowledge and Information Systems, 2009.
  8. M. Drumm, C.d an Schmitt, H. H. Do, and E. Rahm, “Quickmig -automatic schema matching for data migration projects,” Proc. ACM CIKM07., Portugal, 2007.
  9. M. Ehrig, “Ontology alignment, bridging the semantic gap,” Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, vol. 5, pp. 146 – 149, New York, 2007.
  10. F. Giunchiglia, P. Shvaiko, and M. Yatskevich, “S-match: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching,” Proceedings of the European Semantic Web Symposium, Springer, 2004.
  11. W. Hu, G. Cheng, D. Zheng, X. Zhong, and Y. Qu, “The results of falcon-ao in the oaei 2009 campaign. ontology matching,” 2009.
  12. S. Niedbala, “Owl-ctxmatch in the oaei 2006 alignment contest. Ontology matching,” 2006.
  13. [E. Kaufmann, C. Burki, and M. Klein, “How similar is it? towards personalized similarity measures in ontologies.,” In Wirtschaftsinformatik. eEconomy, eGovernment, eSociety, Siebte Internationale, 2005.
  14. A. Maedche and S. Staab, “Measuring similarity between ontologies.,” In Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Acquisition and Management(EKAW), 2002.
  15. I. Levenshtein, Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions,Insertions, and Reversals. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 1965.
  16. T. Cox and M. Cox, “Multidimensional scaling.,” 1994.
  17. O. Svab, V. Svatek, and H. Stuckenschmidt, “A study in empirical and ‘casuistic’ analysis of ontology mapping results.,” In Proceedings of the 4th European conference on The Semantic Web (ESWC-07), pp. 655–669, 2007.
  18. J. Koza, “On theprogramming of computers by means of natural selection (complex adaptive systems),” December, 1992.
  19. “Ontology alignment evaluation initiative (oaei).,” 2009.
  20. Y. Lee, M. Sayyadian, A. Doan, and A. Rosenthal, “etuner: tun-ing schema matching software using synthetic scenarios,” VLDB J, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 97–122, 2007.
  21. D. J. M. V. J. Huang, J. and M. N. Huhns, “ontology matching using an artificial neural network to learn weights.,” IJCAI Workshop on Semantic Web for Collaborative Knowledge Acquisition, 2007.
  22. C. J. J. Wang, Z. Ding, “Goam: Genetic algorithm based ontology matching,” in IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Services Computing.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

ontology ontology heterogeneity ontology alignment FOAM FOAM++ NOM OAEI