CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Modified Low Power Dynamic Adder for High Performance

by R. Sakthivel, M.Vanitha, Harish M Kittur
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 18 - Number 1
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: R. Sakthivel, M.Vanitha, Harish M Kittur
10.5120/2310-1822

R. Sakthivel, M.Vanitha, Harish M Kittur . Modified Low Power Dynamic Adder for High Performance. International Journal of Computer Applications. 18, 1 ( March 2011), 43-47. DOI=10.5120/2310-1822

@article{ 10.5120/2310-1822,
author = { R. Sakthivel, M.Vanitha, Harish M Kittur },
title = { Modified Low Power Dynamic Adder for High Performance },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2011 },
volume = { 18 },
number = { 1 },
month = { March },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 43-47 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume18/number1/2310-1822/ },
doi = { 10.5120/2310-1822 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:05:12.730531+05:30
%A R. Sakthivel
%A M.Vanitha
%A Harish M Kittur
%T Modified Low Power Dynamic Adder for High Performance
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 18
%N 1
%P 43-47
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper proposes a modified form of the design for low dynamic power adder using a reset network in the CMOS dynamic logic family. The results show that the dynamic power reduces as compared to lower dynamic power logic and the domino logic. In this modified form of the low dynamic power adder, the logic outputs are reset to low during the pre-discharge phase which is the high input to the clock. The logic evaluation takes place when the clock input is low. The modified logic is better than domino logic since it does not require an inverter for cascading the gates. In Pre-discharging, resetting the output low prevents the problems of charge sharing and charge leakage associated with the other dynamic logic families and also it avoids the static power dissipation which exists in the low power dynamic logic. Also resetting the output low avoids the problem of high transition time from high level to low level which exists in circuits employing PMOS logic. The proposed circuit is a mix of PMOS logic and a dynamic logic. The proposed logic cell can be cascaded in a domino like fashion without the need of an inverter.

References
  1. J.M. Rabey, A Chandrakasan, B. Nikolic, Digital Integrated circuits. A Design perspective-2c Prentice –Hal, Upper Saddle River , NI,2002.
  2. M . Nadi Senejani, M. Hossein Ghadiry, Low Dyanmic Power High Performance Adder. CADSM,24-28February,2009,Polyana-svalyava(Zakarpattaya),Ukraine.
  3. C. Fang, C. Haung, J. Wamg , C. Yeh, Fast and Compact Dynamic Ripple Carry Adder Design, proceedings of IEEE Asia Pecific Conference on ASIC, APASIC 2002, August 2002, Taipei,Taiwan
  4. R.Zimmermann, W.Fiehtner, Low Power logic styles: CMOS versus Pass-transisitor logic,IEEE J. Solid-State circuits 32(7)(1997)1079-1090
  5. N.Weste K. Eshraghian, Principles of CMOS VLSI Design. A system perspective , Addison Weslay, M.A,1998
  6. Y.Jiang, A. Al-sheridah, Y.Wang, E.Sha, J. Chung . A novel multiplexer based low power full adder, IEEE Trans. Circuits Systems II 52(7) (2004) 345-348
  7. A. P. Chandrakasan and R.W. Brodersen, Low Power Digital CMOS Design, Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 1995
  8. S. Mathew, M. Anders, R. Krishnamurthy, S.Borkar, A 4 GHz 130nm address generation unit with 32-bit sparse-tree adder core, Proceedings of IEEE VLSI Circuits Symposium , Honululu, June 2002, pp-126-127.
  9. S. Mathew, M. Anders, R. Krishnamurthy, S.Borkar, A 4 GHz 130nm address generation unit with 32-bit sparse-tree adder core, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits 38(5) (2003) 689-695.
  10. R.K. Krishnamurthy, S. Hsu, M.. Anders, B. Blocechel, B. Chattergee, M.. Sachdev, S.Borkar. Dual Supply voltahe clocking for 5GHz 130nm integer execution core, proceedings of IEEE Circuits Symposium, June 2002, Honululu, pp 128-129.
  11. S. Vangal. Y. Hoskote. D. Somasekhar, V. Erraguntla. J. howard. G. Ruhl., V. Veeramachaneni, D.Fian, S. Mathew, N. Borkar, A 5 GHz floating Point multiplier accumulator in 90nm dual Vt CMOS, proceedings of IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference, San Francisco, February 2003, pp 334-335.
  12. Victor Navarro-Botello, Juan A. Motiel-Nelson, Saeid Nooshabadi, “High Performance low power CMOS dynamic for arithmetic circuits”, Microelctronics Journal 38,(2007) 482-488
  13. D. H. K. Hoe and A. T. Salama “Dynamic GaAs capacitively coupled domino logic (CCDL),” IEEE J. Solid State Circuits, Vol 26, pp 844-849, June 1991.
  14. O. M. K. Law and C. A. T. Salama, “GaAs split phase dynamic logic,” IEEE J. Solid State Circuits, Vol 29, pp. 617-622, May 1994
  15. V Chandramouli, N. Michell, and K. F. Smith, “ A new, precharged, low power logic family for GaAs circuits,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, pp. 140-143, Feb 1995.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

CMOS VLSI Combinational circuits