We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Development and Application of Gas Turbine Performance Analysis Software: Part II – Modified Cycles

by E. G. Saturday, J. C. Ofodu, M. S. Torbira
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 179 - Number 51
Year of Publication: 2018
Authors: E. G. Saturday, J. C. Ofodu, M. S. Torbira
10.5120/ijca2018917250

E. G. Saturday, J. C. Ofodu, M. S. Torbira . Development and Application of Gas Turbine Performance Analysis Software: Part II – Modified Cycles. International Journal of Computer Applications. 179, 51 ( Jun 2018), 6-14. DOI=10.5120/ijca2018917250

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2018917250,
author = { E. G. Saturday, J. C. Ofodu, M. S. Torbira },
title = { Development and Application of Gas Turbine Performance Analysis Software: Part II – Modified Cycles },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jun 2018 },
volume = { 179 },
number = { 51 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2018 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 6-14 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume179/number51/29522-2018917250/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2018917250 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:58:55.513396+05:30
%A E. G. Saturday
%A J. C. Ofodu
%A M. S. Torbira
%T Development and Application of Gas Turbine Performance Analysis Software: Part II – Modified Cycles
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 179
%N 51
%P 6-14
%D 2018
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper presents the second part of the development and application of gas turbine performance analysis software. The simple ideal cycle and the real cycle engines were considered in the first paper. Four modifications to the simple cycle engine are considered here. These are regenerative cycle, intercooled cycle, reheat cycle, and the cycle with all three modifications combined. The mathematical models of the performance of each engine cycle is developed and implemented in the developed software. The thermal efficiency and specific fuel consumption (sfc) of each engine cycle over a wide range of pressure ratios are generated and compared. The thermal efficiencies of the intercooled plant and the reheat plant are lower than that of the simple cycle plant; also, their sfc are both higher than that of the simple cycle plant indicating that they are not suitable stand-alone modifications. These two plants also respond to increase in turbine entry temperature slowly. The regenerative cycle provides greater thermal efficiency at lower pressure ratios which decreases to that of the simple cycle plant at the optimum pressure ratio. The sfc of the regenerative cycle is smaller than that of the simple engine cycle, and increases to the value of the simple cycle plant at the optimum pressure ratio. This plant responds to increase in TET greatly; even more than the cycle with all three modifications combined, and is a suitable stand-alone modification to the simple cycle plant. The cycle with all modifications combined has the highest thermal efficiency value at lower pressure ratios which decreases to the simple cycle value at a pressure ratio higher than the optimum pressure ratio. The sfc of this cycle is the lowest and increases to the simple cycle value at a higher pressure ratio. The developed software could form a useful tool in system design.

References
  1. E. G. Saturday and J. C. Ofodu, “Development and Application of Gas Turbine Performance Analysis Software : Part I- Ideal Cycles and Real Cycles,” vol. 180, no. 37, pp. 20–26, 2018.
  2. K. Ashok, S. S. Kachhwaha, and R. S. Mishra, “Thermodynamic Analysis of a Regenerative Gas Turbine Cogeneration Plant,” J. Sci. Ind. Res., vol. 69, pp. 225–231, 2010.
  3. R. Ranjan and M. Tariq, “Analysis of a Regenerative Gas Turbine Cycle for Performance Evaluation,” vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 792–801, 2014.
  4. H. Omar, A. Kamel, and M. Alsanousi, “Performance of Regenerative Gas Turbine Power Plant,” pp. 136–146, 2017.
  5. W. Hussein and A. Razzaq, “Parametric Performance of Gas Turbine Power Plant with Effect Intercooler,” Mod. Appl. Sci., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 173–184, 2011.
  6. T. K. Ibrahim, M. M. Rahman, and A. N. A. Alla, “Study on the Effective Parameter of Gas Turbine Model with Intercooled Compression Process,” Sci. Res. Essays, vol. 5, no. 23, pp. 3760–3770, 2010.
  7. I. G. Rice, “The Combined Reheat Gas Turbine / Steam Turbine Cycle Part || — The LM 5000 Gas Generator Applied to the Combined Reheat Gas Turbine / Steam,” J. Eng. Power, vol. 102, pp. 42–49, 1980.
  8. M. S. Patil, D. B. Pawase, and E. R. Deore, “Thermal Performance of Reheat , Regenerative , Inter Cooled Gas Turbine Cycle,” IJRMET, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 28–33, 2015.
  9. M. J. Mohammed and M. Tariq, “Analysis of a Combined Regenerative and Reheat Gas Turbine Cycle using MATLAB,” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. Res., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 665–672, 2014.
  10. A. M. Ahmed and M. Tariq, “Thermal Analysis of a Gas Turbine Power Plant to Improve Performance Efficiency,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 43–54, 2013.
  11. R. Andriani, F. Gamma, and U. Ghezzi, “Main Effects of Intercooling and Regeneration On Aeronautical Gas Turbine Engines,” in 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit 25 - 28 July 2010, Nashville, TN, 2010, no. July, pp. 1–8.
  12. Y. A. Cengel and M. A. Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 5th ed. NY: McGraw-Hill, 2009.
  13. V. M. Domkundwar, A Course in Internal Combustion Engines. New Dehli: Gagan Kapur, 2008.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Regenerative cycle intercooled cycle reheat cycle specific fuel consumption turbine entry temperature.