We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Internet of Things (IoT): The Most Up-To-Date Challenges, Architectures, Emerging Trends and Potential Opportunities

by Emrah Irmak, Mehmet Bozdal
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 179 - Number 40
Year of Publication: 2018
Authors: Emrah Irmak, Mehmet Bozdal
10.5120/ijca2018916946

Emrah Irmak, Mehmet Bozdal . Internet of Things (IoT): The Most Up-To-Date Challenges, Architectures, Emerging Trends and Potential Opportunities. International Journal of Computer Applications. 179, 40 ( May 2018), 20-27. DOI=10.5120/ijca2018916946

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2018916946,
author = { Emrah Irmak, Mehmet Bozdal },
title = { Internet of Things (IoT): The Most Up-To-Date Challenges, Architectures, Emerging Trends and Potential Opportunities },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2018 },
volume = { 179 },
number = { 40 },
month = { May },
year = { 2018 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 20-27 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume179/number40/29347-2018916946/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2018916946 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:57:58.838652+05:30
%A Emrah Irmak
%A Mehmet Bozdal
%T Internet of Things (IoT): The Most Up-To-Date Challenges, Architectures, Emerging Trends and Potential Opportunities
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 179
%N 40
%P 20-27
%D 2018
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) is nowadays the most profound buzzword in Information Technology science. IoT is the evolution of Information Technology which aims to build a mutual infrastructure that integrates, connects and telecommunicates every ‘Things’ (Objects) with each other on the face of the earth. This interconnected infrastructure provides humans with fully control of things. Projections and potential estimates about incomings of IoT are spectacular for future directions. IoT encompasses such a wide range of spectrum that its influences are anyone’s guess. Not only the profits of IoT but also the forfeits and fears of IoT are unpredictable for yet. However, with the increase in research, academic studies and technological developments the atmosphere will be clear for IoT. This research paper proposes a novel comprehensive reference source for those who are interested in IoT, ubiquitous sensing, pervasive computing and smart objects. The paper explains IoT emergence and IoT history in detail, current IoT usage areas, the most up-to-date potential opportunities and future IoT directions, overall IoT architecture and well-liked architectures, security and privacy concerns about IoT. The latest ongoing IoT projects are discussed and the latest burning issues are presented. Critical and turning points of IoT are given in tabular. As compared to similar survey papers in the area, to the best of our knowledge contributions of this paper are unique.

References
  1. K. Ashton, “That ‘Internet of Things’ Thing,” RFiD J., p. 4986, 2009.
  2. S. Madakam, R. Ramaswamy, and S. Tripathi, “Internet of Things (IoT): A Literature Review,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 164–173, 2015.
  3. “Internet of Things,” Oxford Dictionaries. 2015.
  4. L. Atzori, A. Iera, and G. Morabito, “The Internet of Thinags: A survey,” Comput. Networks, vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 2787–2805, 2010.
  5. J. Bélissent, “Getting Clever About Smart Cities : New Opportunities Require New Business Models,” Forrester Research, Cambridge, 2010.
  6. “Internet Users in the World by regions,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
  7. J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, and S. Marusic, “Internet of Things ( IoT ): A Vision , Architectural Elements , and Future Directions,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2013.
  8. “Gartner’s Estimate,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3598917.
  9. “IoT Google Trends.” [Online]. Available: https://trends.google.com/trends/.
  10. V. R. Vedang and S. Gopal, “A Literature Review on Internet of Things (IoT),” Int. J. Comput. Syst., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 355–358, 2015.
  11. Carnegie-University-Mellon-Computer -Science, “The ‘Only’ Coke Machine on the Internet,” Web. Carnegie Mellon University Computer Science Department, n.d. Web. 06 Sept. 2015.
  12. “In Memory of Dr. Mark Weiser,” PARC. [Online]. Available: http://www.parc.com/services/focus-area/ubicomp/.
  13. “First Internet of Things Toaster.” [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Hackett.
  14. S. B. Brave and S. A. Benton, “Tangible Interfaces for Remote Communication and Collaboration,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998.
  15. N. Gershenfeld, When Things Start to Think. Henry Holt and Co., Inc., New York, NY., 1999.
  16. D. R. R. Minerva, A. Biru, “IEEE IoT Towards Definition Internet of Things Rev. 1,” IEEE Internet Things, pp. 1–86, 2015.
  17. U. N. S. E. F. (UNSEF), “A Brief History of the IoT,” in Workshop on Internet of Things Development for the Promotion of Information Economy, 2015, pp. 1–12.
  18. J. Compton, “The Ambient Orb: Striving for a PC-Free Tomorrow,” Yahoo! Voices, 2014.
  19. “Internet of Things History.” [Online]. Available: https://www.postscapes.com/internet-of-things-history/.
  20. “Nabaztag.” [Online]. Available: nabaztag.com.
  21. C. Rajan, B. Megala, A. Nandhini, and C. R. Priya, “A Review : Comparative Analysis of Arduino Micro Controllers in Robotic Car,” vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 371–380, 2015.
  22. A. K. P. J. Vasseur, C. P. Bertrand, F. Watteco, B. Aboussouan, V. Marketing, G. E. Gnoske, “A survey of several low power Link layers for IP Smart Objects,” Internet Protocol for Smart Objects (IPSO) Alliance, 2010.
  23. O. Kharif, “FCC’s Kevin Martin Supports Freeing White Spaces,” Business Week, 2008.
  24. K. Claffy, “Tracking IPv6 Evolution : Data We Have and Data We Need,” ACM Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 43–48, 2011.
  25. M. Friedemann and C. Floerkemeir, “From the Internet to the Internet of Things,” From Act. Data Manag. to Event-Based Syst. More, pp. 242–259, 2011.
  26. A. Zanella, N. Bui, A. Castellani, L. Vangelista, and M. Zorzi, “Internet of Things for Smart Cities,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 22–32, 2014.
  27. S. Adario, “Elon Musk thinks universal income is answer to automation taking human jobs,” mashable.com, 2017.
  28. C. R. Schoenberger, “The internet of things,” Forbes Magazine, 2002.
  29. D. R. R. Minerva, A. Biru, “IEEE IoT Towards Definition Internet of Things Rev. 1,” IEEE Internet Things, vol. Revision1, pp. 1–86, 2016.
  30. S. E. S. C. Floerkemeier, M. Langheinrich, E. Fleisch, F. Mattern, “The Internet of Things,” in First International Conference, IOT 2008, LNCS 4952, Springer, 2008.
  31. G. Feller, “The Internet of Things: In a Connected World of Smart Objects,” Accent. Bankinter Found. Innov., 2011.
  32. Y. Yang, L. Wu, G. Yin, L. Li, and H. Zhao, “A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues in Internet-of-Things,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. PP, no. 99, p. 1, 2017.
  33. K. Rose, S. Eldridge, and C. Lyman, “The internet of things: an overview,” Internet Soc., no. October, p. 53, 2015.
  34. M. U. Farooq and M. Waseem, “A Review on Internet of Things ( IoT ),” Int. J. Comput. Appl. (0975 8887), vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2015.
  35. V. I. M. Swarnamugi, R.Chinnaiyan, “IoT Technologies and Machine Learning Algorithms – A Study,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. Res. Technol., vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 614–621, 2016.
  36. R. D. G. Dregvaite, “Information and Software Technologies,” in Information and Software Technologies: 22nd International Conference, ICIST Druskininkai, Lithuania, Proceedings. Springer.–. ISBN 978-3-319-46254-7., 2016, p. 665.
  37. C. Qualcomm, “Wearable and Smart Homes,” 2015. .
  38. J. Manyika et al., “The Internet of Things: Mapping the value beyond the hype,” McKinsey Glob. Inst., no. June, p. 144, 2015.
  39. I. Mashal, O. Alsaryrah, T. Y. Chung, C. Z. Yang, W. H. Kuo, and D. P. Agrawal, “Choices for interaction with things on Internet and underlying issues,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 28, pp. 68–90, 2015.
  40. O. Said and M. Masud, “Towards internet of things: Survey and future vision,” Int. J. Comput. Networks, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2013.
  41. M. Wu, T. J. Lu, F. Y. Ling, J. Sun, and H. Y. Du, “Research on the architecture of Internet of Things,” ICACTE 2010 - 2010 3rd Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Theory Eng. Proc., vol. 5, pp. 484–487, 2010.
  42. R. Khan, S. U. Khan, R. Zaheer, and S. Khan, “Future internet: The internet of things architecture, possible applications and key challenges,” Proc. - 10th Int. Conf. Front. Inf. Technol. FIT 2012, pp. 257–260, 2012.
  43. H. Ning and Z. Wang, “Future Internet of Things Architecture :,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 461–463, 2011.
  44. P. Sethi and S. R. Sarangi, “Internet of Things: Architectures, Protocols, and Applications,” J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 2017, pp. 1–25, 2017.
  45. S. K. Chaulya and G. M. Prasad, Sensing and Monitoring Technologies for Mines and Hazardous Areas: Monitoring and Prediction Technologies, 1. Edition. Cambridge: Elsevier, 2016.
  46. D. T. I. R. M. R. Abdmeziem, “Architecting the Internet of Things : State of the Architecting the Internet of Things : State of the,” Robot. Sens. Clouds. Stud. Syst. Decis. Control. Springer, Cham, vol. 36, no. July, pp. 55–75, 2015.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

IoT Ubiquitous Computing IoT Security