CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Software Development Methods – Properties and Advances

by Syed Hamid Hasan, Usman Ali Khan
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 178 - Number 53
Year of Publication: 2019
Authors: Syed Hamid Hasan, Usman Ali Khan
10.5120/ijca2019919436

Syed Hamid Hasan, Usman Ali Khan . Software Development Methods – Properties and Advances. International Journal of Computer Applications. 178, 53 ( Sep 2019), 26-32. DOI=10.5120/ijca2019919436

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2019919436,
author = { Syed Hamid Hasan, Usman Ali Khan },
title = { Software Development Methods – Properties and Advances },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Sep 2019 },
volume = { 178 },
number = { 53 },
month = { Sep },
year = { 2019 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 26-32 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume178/number53/30913-2019919436/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2019919436 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:53:54.056061+05:30
%A Syed Hamid Hasan
%A Usman Ali Khan
%T Software Development Methods – Properties and Advances
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 178
%N 53
%P 26-32
%D 2019
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

It has taken a period of time for evolution of the field of software development. In order to promote its effectiveness and efficiency propositions of various models and methods has been done. In this paper we are going to discuss the various models and methods, while identifying the latest industry trends and also discuss their impacts..

References
  1. Sommerville, I. (2011) Software engineering, 9th edition. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley ISBN 10: 0-13-703515-2
  2. W. W. Royce, Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Software Engineering, p.328-338, March 1987, Monterey, California, USA.
  3. Navid Hashemi Taba (2012) Improving Software Quality Using a Defect Management-Oriented (DEMAO) Software Inspection Model, 2012 Sixth Asia Modelling Symposium, DOI 10.1109/AMS.2012.51
  4. Xihui Zhang, Tao Hu, Hua Dai and Xiang Li, ‘Software Development Methodologies, Trends and Implications: A Testing Centric View, Information Technology Journal, Volume 9 (8): 1747-1753, 2010.
  5. Ahmed Mateen, Muhammad Azeem Akbar, Mohammad Shafiq, ‘AZ Model for Software Development’, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 151 – No.6, October 2016
  6. Munassar, N. M. A. and Govardhan, A. 2010. A Comparison between Five Models of Software Engineering. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 7, Issue 5, pp: 94-101, September 2010.
  7. Bassil Y. 2012. A simulation model for the waterfall software development life cycle. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 2(5): 1-7.
  8. Majumdar A., Masiwal, G. and Chawan, P. M. 2012. Analysis of Various Software Process Models, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2012, pp: 2015-2021
  9. Hurst, J. 2014. Comparing Software Development Life Cycles, SANNS Software Security.
  10. Taya, S. and Gupta, S. 2011. Comparative Analysis of Software Development Life Cycle Models, IJCST Vol. 2, Issue 4, Oct.-Dec. 2011.
  11. Shmuel Ur, Elad Yom-Tov and Paul Wernick, An Open Source Simulation Model of Software Development and Testing, Hardware and Software, Verification and Testing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, vol. 4383, pp. 124-137, 2007
  12. B. Boehm and K.J. Sullivan, “Software Economics: Status and Prospects,” Special Millenium Issue, Information and Software Technology, 2000.
  13. Leung, H., and Fan, Z., Software Cost Estimation. Handbook of Software Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University 2002
  14. Alan M. Davis, Edward H. Bersoff and Edward R. Comer, A Strategy for comparing Alternative Software Development Life Cycle Models, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, VOL. 14, NO. 10, OCTOBER 1988
  15. Y. Chernak, "Validating and improving test-case effectiveness," Software, IEEE , vol.18, no.1, pp.81-86, Jan/Feb 2001doi: 10.1109/52.903172
  16. M. V. Mantyla, C. Lassenius, " What Types of Defects Are Really Discovered in Code Reviews?," Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on , vol.35, no.3, pp.430-448, May-June 2009 doi: 10.1109/TSE.2008.71
  17. D. E. Perry, A. Porter, M. W. Wade, L. G. Votta, and J. Perpich, " Reducing inspection interval in large-scale software development," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(7), 695-695-705. doi:10.1109/TSE.2002. 1019483
  18. O. Laitenberger, and J. DeBaud,"An Encompassing Life Cycle Centric Survey of Software Inspection," Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 50, 2000, pp. 5-31.
  19. A. Porter, H. P. Siy, C. A. Toman, and L. G., "An experiment to assess the cost-benefits of code inspections in large scale software development,"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 23(6), 1997, 329-329-346. doi:10.1109
  20. M. Agrawal, K. Chari, "Software Effort, Quality, and Cycle Time: A Study of CMM Level 5 Projects," Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on , vol.33, no.3, pp.145-156, March 2007 doi: 10.1109/TSE.2007.29
  21. D. L Parnas, and M. Lawford, "Inspection's role in software quality assurance," IEEE Software, 20(4), 16-16-20. doi:10.1109/MS.2003.1207449
  22. C. K. Tyran, "A Software Inspection Exercise for the Systems Analysis and Design Course," Journal of Information Systems Education, 17(3), 2006, Pp. 341-351.
  23. T. Dyb, B.A. Kitchenham, M. Jrgensen, "Evidence-Based Software Engineering for Practitioners", IEEE Software, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 58-65, 2005.
  24. T. Berling, T. Thelin, "An Industrial Case Study of the Verification and Validation Activities", Proc. 9th Int'l Software Metrics Symp., pp. 226-238, 2003.
  25. A. Aurum, H. Petersson, C. Wohlin, "State-of-the-Art: Software Inspections after 25 Years", Software Testing Verification and Reliability, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 133-154, 2002.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Methods of Software development Agile & Life cycle method software testing.