CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Exploration of Various Performance Metrics for Evaluation and Assessment of School Teachers Performance

by Neeta Panchmukh, Indumati Singh, Remica Aggarwal, Nivedita Jamdade, Veena Aggarwal
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 178 - Number 46
Year of Publication: 2019
Authors: Neeta Panchmukh, Indumati Singh, Remica Aggarwal, Nivedita Jamdade, Veena Aggarwal
10.5120/ijca2019919388

Neeta Panchmukh, Indumati Singh, Remica Aggarwal, Nivedita Jamdade, Veena Aggarwal . Exploration of Various Performance Metrics for Evaluation and Assessment of School Teachers Performance. International Journal of Computer Applications. 178, 46 ( Sep 2019), 1-6. DOI=10.5120/ijca2019919388

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2019919388,
author = { Neeta Panchmukh, Indumati Singh, Remica Aggarwal, Nivedita Jamdade, Veena Aggarwal },
title = { Exploration of Various Performance Metrics for Evaluation and Assessment of School Teachers Performance },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Sep 2019 },
volume = { 178 },
number = { 46 },
month = { Sep },
year = { 2019 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-6 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume178/number46/30856-2019919388/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2019919388 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:53:15.038808+05:30
%A Neeta Panchmukh
%A Indumati Singh
%A Remica Aggarwal
%A Nivedita Jamdade
%A Veena Aggarwal
%T Exploration of Various Performance Metrics for Evaluation and Assessment of School Teachers Performance
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 178
%N 46
%P 1-6
%D 2019
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

School teachers are amongst basic pillars in his/ her students’ outmost growth and performance. Evaluation and assessment of a teacher’s performance is therefore becoming an essential component for any educational establishments . Since the turn of the century, teacher assessment and evaluation have been put forward as an important strategy for assuring and developing educational quality in many countries. Out of 28 countries surveyed in the OECD1 Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes (2013), 22 reported having national- or state-level policy frameworks for teacher evaluation. In the six remaining countries, practices to provide feedback on teachers’ work were designed and implemented locally. Present research work therefore focuses on exploring based on existing researches, possible indicators or metrics that could be helpful in evaluation of primary and secondary school teachers in Asian countries. Thereafter, it also tries to study the interrelationship amongst them using ISM methodology .

References
  1. Crowe, E. 2010. Measuring What Matters: A Stronger Accountability Model for Teacher Education. Washington: Center for American Progress.
  2. Mitchell, K.J. , Robinson, D.Z. , Plake, B.S. and Knowles, K.T. 2001. Testing Teacher Candidates: The Role of Licensure Tests in Improving Teacher Quality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  3. Milanowski, A. 2004. The Relationship Between Teacher Performance Evaluation Scores and Student Achievement: Evidence From Cincinnati. Peabody Journal of Education 79 (4), 33-53.
  4. Humphrey, D. Koppich, J. and Heather H. 2005. Sharing the wealth: National Board Certified Teachers and the students who need them most. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 13 (18) Http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n18/ v13n18.pdf.
  5. Pecheone, R. and Chung, R. 2006. Evidence in Teacher Education: The Performance Assessment for California Teachers. Journal of Teacher Education 57 (1), 22-36.
  6. Athanases, S. 1994. Teachers’ Reports of the Effects of Preparing Portfolios of Literacy Instruction. Elementary School Journal 94 (4) , 421-439.
  7. Haynes, D. 1995. One Teacher’s Experience with National Board assessment. Educational Leadership, 52 (8), 58-60.
  8. Buday, M. and Kelly, J. 1996. National Board Certification and the Teaching Professions Commitment to Quality Assurance. Phi Delta Kappan, 78 (3) , 215-219.
  9. Chung, R.R. 2008. Beyond Assessment: Performance Assessments in Teacher Education, Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(1), 7-28.
  10. Charles P., Gallucci, C. and Sloan, T. 2010. Negotiating implementation of high-stakes performance assessment policies in teacher education: From compliance to inquiry, Journal of Teacher Education 61 (3). http://jte.sagepub. com/content/early/2010/03/12/0022487109354520.
  11. James Wyckoff , J. Thomas, D. 2013.Teaching quality education and effectiveness , National Bureau of Economic Research.
  12. Goldhaber, Dan; Tseng, Fannie; Goldschmidt, Pete, 2013. Teacher Value-Added at the High-School Level: Different Models, Different Answers?, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.
  13. Cook-Smith, Nancy; Coyle, Harold; Miller, Jaimie; Sadler, Philip; Sonnert, Gerhard. 2013. The Influence of Teachers' Knowledge on Student Learning in Middle School Physical Science Classrooms, American Educational Research Journal.
  14. Chetty, Raj; Friedman, John; Rockoff, Jonah. 2011. The Long-Term Impacts of Teachers: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood. , National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper
  15. Skedsmo, G.,  Hube , S.G. 2018. Teacher evaluation: the need for valid measures and increased teacher involvement, springer , 30(1), 1–5.
  16. Hallinger, P., Heck, R., & Murphy, J. 2014. Teacher evaluation and school improvement: an analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 5–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9179-5.
  17. Huber, S. G., & Skedsmo, G. 2016. Teacher evaluation—accountability and improving teaching practices. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(2), 105–109.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9241-1.
  18. Lavigne, A. L., & Chamberlain, R. W. 2017. Teacher evaluation in Illinois: school leaders’ perceptions and practices. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29(2), 179–209.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9250-0.
  19. Liu, S., Xu, X., & Stronge, J. H. 2016. Chinese middle school teachers’ preferences regarding performance evaluation measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(2), 161–177.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9237-x.
  20. Meng, L., & Muñoz, M. 2016. Teachers’ perceptions of effective teaching: a comparative study of elementary school teachers from China and the USA. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(2), 179–199.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9230-9.
  21. Roegman, R., Goodwin, A. L., & Reed, R. 2016. Unpacking the data: an analysis of the use of Danielson’s (2007) Framework for Professional Practice in a teaching residency program. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(2), 111–137.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9228-3.
  22. Santelices, M. V., Valencia, E., Gonzalez, J., & Taut, S. 2017. Two teacher quality measures and the role of context: evidence from Chile. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29(2), 111–146.   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9247-8.
  23. Skedsmo, G., & Huber, S. G. 2017. Evaluation of educators’ performance—balancing various measures to improve practice. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29(2), 107–110.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-017-9262-4.
  24. Chellma , A.A.C. 2010. Instructional design for teachers : Improving classroom practices , Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(1) . ISBN 13: 978-0415803243.
  25. Warfield, J., N. 1974. Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. In the proceedings of IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 4 (1), 81-87
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) Teacher evaluation Primary and secondary school teachers

Powered by PhDFocusTM