CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Studying the Interrelationship amongst Barriers for Implementation of Technology based Educational Techniques in Teaching Institutions in India

by Arnav Jain, Remica Aggarwal, P. C. Jha
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 178 - Number 19
Year of Publication: 2019
Authors: Arnav Jain, Remica Aggarwal, P. C. Jha
10.5120/ijca2019918936

Arnav Jain, Remica Aggarwal, P. C. Jha . Studying the Interrelationship amongst Barriers for Implementation of Technology based Educational Techniques in Teaching Institutions in India. International Journal of Computer Applications. 178, 19 ( Jun 2019), 5-12. DOI=10.5120/ijca2019918936

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2019918936,
author = { Arnav Jain, Remica Aggarwal, P. C. Jha },
title = { Studying the Interrelationship amongst Barriers for Implementation of Technology based Educational Techniques in Teaching Institutions in India },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jun 2019 },
volume = { 178 },
number = { 19 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2019 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 5-12 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume178/number19/30640-2019918936/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2019918936 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:50:50.703969+05:30
%A Arnav Jain
%A Remica Aggarwal
%A P. C. Jha
%T Studying the Interrelationship amongst Barriers for Implementation of Technology based Educational Techniques in Teaching Institutions in India
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 178
%N 19
%P 5-12
%D 2019
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The education sector in India has witnessed a paradigm shift in recent years . This research focuses on studying various barriers to the implementation of technology based constructivist learning and various barriers for its successful implementation in developing countries like India . Further , the interrelationship amongst them have been discussed with the help of Interpretive Structural Modelling Methodology .

References
  1. Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology , MIS Quarterly, 13 (3),  319-340 .
  2. Davis, F. R.,  Bagozzi, R. and Warshaw, P. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models , Management Science, 35 (8),  982-1003 .
  3. Venkatesh ,V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model , Information Systems Research, 11 (4) ,  342-365.
  4. V. Venkatesh, V. and  Bala , H. 2008. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions , Decision Sciences, 39 (2) ,  273-315
  5. Kundu, A. and Kedar Nath , D. 2018. Barriers to Utilizing ICT in Education in India with a Special Focus on Rural Areas, International Journal of Scientific Research and Reviews (IJSRR), 7(2), 341 -359 .
  6. Fusilier, M. and Durlabhji , S. 2005. An exploration of student internet use in India the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behaviour , Campus-Wide Information Systems, 22 (4),  233-246.
  7. The Economist. 2008. The future of higher education: How technology will shape learners. Economist Intelligence Unit, New Media Consortium
  8. Su, B. 2009. Effective technology integration: Old topic, new thoughts. Monterey Bay, USA.
  9. Aiman-Smith,L. and  Green, S.G. 2002. Implementing new manufacturing technology: the related effects of technology characteristics and user learning activities , Academy of Management Journal, 45 (2),. 421-430
  10. Bingimlas, K. 2009. The barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, science and technology education, 5 (3).
  11. Koller, V., Harvey, S. & Magnotta, M. 2001. Technology-based teaching strategies. Social Policy Public Research Association. New York.
  12. Brown, I.T.J. 2002. Individual & technological factors affecting perceived ease of use of web-based learning technologies in a developing country , The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 9 (5), 1-15 .
  13. Tarafdar, M. and  Vaidya, S. 2006. Challenges in the adoption of E-Commerce technologies in India: the role of organizational factors, International Journal of Information Management, 26 , 428-441.
  14. Georgina, D. A., & Hosford, C. C. 2009. Higher education faculty perceptions on technology integration and training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 690–696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.004
  15. Chan Lin, L.J., Hong, J.C., Horng, J.S., Chang, S.H., & Chu, H.C. 2006. Factors influencing technology integration in teaching: A Taiwanese perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 57–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703290500467467
  16. Salehi, H., & Salehi, Z. 2012. Challenges for Using ICT in Education: Teachers’ Insights. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 2(1), 40-43.
  17. Wood, E., Mueller, J., Willoughby, T., Specht, J., & Deyoung, T. 2005. Teachers’ perceptions: barriers and supports to using technology in the classroom. Education,Communication and Information, 5(2), 183–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14636310500186214
  18. Jones, A. 2004. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA), corp creator. A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers.
  19. Al-Senaidi, S., Lin, L., & Poirot, J. 2009. Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning in Oman. Computers & Education, 53(3), 575–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.015
  20. Karasavvidis, I. 2009. Activity theory as a conceptual framework for understanding teacher approaches to information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 53(2), 436–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.003
  21. Prestridge, S. 2012. The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028
  22. Lee, S.M., Kim, L.S. Rhee, S.. 2006. The role of exogenous factors in technology acceptance: the case of object-oriented technology , Information and Management, 43,  469-480 .
  23. Catherall , P. 2005. Skills exchange experience by students in the use of education technology/e-learning. Power point presentation.
  24. Warfield, J.N. 1974. Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, (1), 81-87.
  25. Katsifili. 2010 . The impact of blackboard software on education, globally over the past 10 years. Academic Innovation, Blackboard Inc.
  26. Deshmukh, S.V. and Chavan, A. 2012. Six Sigma and SMEs: a critical review of literature, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 3(2), 157-167,  https://doi.org/10.1108/20401461211243720.
  27. Raghunath, A. and Jayathirtha, R.V. 2013. Barriers for implementation of Six Sigma by Small and Medium Enterprises , International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, 2(2).
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

ISM methodology technology education educational sector

Powered by PhDFocusTM