CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Efficient Driving Forces to CMMI Development using Dynamic Capabilities

by Maruthi Rohit Ayyagari
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 178 - Number 18
Year of Publication: 2019
Authors: Maruthi Rohit Ayyagari
10.5120/ijca2019919024

Maruthi Rohit Ayyagari . Efficient Driving Forces to CMMI Development using Dynamic Capabilities. International Journal of Computer Applications. 178, 18 ( Jun 2019), 24-29. DOI=10.5120/ijca2019919024

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2019919024,
author = { Maruthi Rohit Ayyagari },
title = { Efficient Driving Forces to CMMI Development using Dynamic Capabilities },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jun 2019 },
volume = { 178 },
number = { 18 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2019 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 24-29 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume178/number18/30636-2019919024/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2019919024 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:50:47.850987+05:30
%A Maruthi Rohit Ayyagari
%T Efficient Driving Forces to CMMI Development using Dynamic Capabilities
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 178
%N 18
%P 24-29
%D 2019
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The innovation of new technologies and dynamic marketing environments led software organizations to adopt standards and best practices. The main objectives of these organization are to improve engineering and development, management of service delivery, and supplier management processes. The Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) provides models for acquiring products (CMMI-ACQ), models for quality services (CMMI-SRV), and models for development (CMMI-DEV). The CMMI follows a set of stages known as the CMMI levels from one to five that determine an organization maturity level. Therefore, as the organization raises its maturity level to a higher level, it increases productivity, Return on Investments (ROI), and resource utilization. However, as a reference model, CMMI does not provide tools with the dynamic behavior of a competitive environment; therefore, organizations strive to enhance their market shares. This paper proposes to integrate the dynamic capability model with the CMMI; accordingly, the proposed model adapts and empowers the organization’s resources competitively. This paper intends to add dynamic capability components as part of the CMMI levels four and five. The proposed framework was validated using the System Usability Scale (SUS) model. Results showed that the model is applicable and useful to enhance organization competence.

References
  1. I. Atoum, C. H. Bong, and N. Kulathuramaiyer, “Towards Resolving Software Quality-in-Use Measurement Challenges,” Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, vol. 5, no. 11. pp. 877–885, 2014.
  2. I. Atoum, “A Novel Framework for Measuring Software Quality-in-use based on Semantic Similarity and Sentiment Analysis of Software Reviews,” J. King Saud Univ. - Comput. Inf. Sci., p. , 2018.
  3. J. Samalikova, R. J. Kusters, J. J. M. Trienekens, and A. J. M. M. Weijters, “Process mining support for Capability Maturity Model Integration-based software process assessment, in principle and in practice,” J. Softw. Evol. Process, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 714–728, 2014.
  4. A. G. A. Saeed, R. S. Afgun Usmani, H. Akram, S. M. Saqlain, “The Impact of Capability Maturity Model Integration on Return on Investment in IT Industry: An Exploratory Case Study,” Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 2189–2193, 2017.
  5. D. Chevers, “Software Process Improvement : Awarness, Use, and Benefits in Canadian Software Development Firms,” Rev. Adm. Empres., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 170–177, Apr. 2017.
  6. Software Engineering Institute, “CMMI for Development, Version 1.3,” Carnegie Mellon University, 2010. .
  7. R. W. Reitzig, D. R. Goldenson, D. Gibson, and M. R. Cavanaugh, “Calculating CMMI-Based ROI: Why, When, What, and How?,” in 19th Annual SEPG Conference, 2007.
  8. C. Ebert, “Technical controlling and software process improvement,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 25–39, Apr. 1999.
  9. S. Bayona, J. A. Calvo-Manzano, and T. San Feliu, “Critical Success Factors in Software Process Improvement: A Systematic Review,” in Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, 2012, pp. 1–12.
  10. F. Testa, N. M. Gusmerottia, F. Corsini, E. Passetti, and F. Iraldo, “Factors affecting environmental management by small and micro firms: The importance of entrepreneurs’ attitudes and environmental investment,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 373–385, 2016.
  11. A. Wibowo and H. Wilhelm Alfen, “Identifying macro-environmental critical success factors and key areas for improvement to promote public-private partnerships in infrastructure: Indonesia’s perspective,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 383–402, 2014.
  12. M. Akhtar, “Strategic performance management system in uncertain business environment: An empirical study of the Indian oil industry,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 923–942, 2018.
  13. M. A. Camilleri, “The marketing environment,” in Travel Marketing, Tourism Economics and the Airline Product, Springer, 2018, pp. 51–68.
  14. K. Lee, Y. Park, and D. Lee, “Measuring efficiency and ICT ecosystem impact: Hardware vs. software industry,” Telecomm. Policy, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 107–115, 2017.
  15. J. Miler and K. Kaidy, “Problems and Solutions of Software Design in Scrum Projects,” in 2018 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), 2018, pp. 975–978.
  16. L. Valverde, M. M. da Silva, and M. R. Gonçalves, “CMMI-DEV v1. 3 Reference Model in ArchiMate,” in OTM Confederated International Conferences" On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems", 2018, pp. 191–208.
  17. C. E. Helfat, Dynamic capabilities: understanding strategic change in organizations. Blackwell Publ., 2010.
  18. S. Mclaughlin, “Dynamic capabilities: Taking an emerging technology perspective,” Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., vol. 31, p. 62, 2017.
  19. M. R. Ayyagari and I. Atoum, “CMMI-DEV Implementation Simplified:A Spiral Software Model,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 445–450, 2019.
  20. D. J. Teece, “Business models and dynamic capabilities,” Long Range Plann., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 40–49, 2018.
  21. A. . Fallis et al., Dynamic Capabilities Understanding Strategic Change In Organizations, vol. 53, no. August. 2009.
  22. G. Ludwig and J. Pemberton, “A managerial perspective of dynamic capabilities in emerging markets: The case of the Russian steel industry,” J. East Eur. Manag. Stud., pp. 215–236, 2011.
  23. G. A. Ortiz, M. E. M. Trujillo, H. Oktaba, and E. R. Hernandez, “Integrating agile methods into a level 5 cmmi-dev organization: a case study,” IEEE Lat. Am. Trans., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1440–1446, 2016.
  24. A. L. Peres and S. L. Meira, “Towards a framework that promotes integration between the UX design and SCRUM, aligned to CMMI,” in 2015 10th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2015, pp. 1–4.
  25. M. R. Ayyagari, “A Framework for Analytical CRM Assessments Challenges and Recommendations,” Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 5, p. [to appear], 2019.
  26. M. R. Ayyagari, “Integrating Association Rules with Decision Trees in ObjectRelational Databases,” Int. J. Comput. Trends Technol., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 102–108, 2019.
  27. M. R. Ayyagari, “iScrum: Effective Innovation Steering using Scrum Methodology,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 178, no. 10, pp. 8–13, May 2019.
  28. S. Mahmoodi, U. Durak, T. Gerlach, S. Hartmann, and A. D’Ambrogio, “Extending the CMMI Engineering Process Areas for Simulation Systems Engineering,” in Simulation Science, 2017, pp. 193–207.
  29. J. Brooke, “SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale,” Usability Eval. Ind., vol. 189, no. 194, pp. 4–7, 1996.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

CMMI dynamic capabilities software usability scaling (SUS)

Powered by PhDFocusTM