CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

A Performance Comparison of Reliable-AODV for MANET in NS-2, NS-3 and Qualnet

by Mazher Sarfaraz Khan, Sayyad Ajij D
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 178 - Number 15
Year of Publication: 2019
Authors: Mazher Sarfaraz Khan, Sayyad Ajij D
10.5120/ijca2019918913

Mazher Sarfaraz Khan, Sayyad Ajij D . A Performance Comparison of Reliable-AODV for MANET in NS-2, NS-3 and Qualnet. International Journal of Computer Applications. 178, 15 ( May 2019), 47-53. DOI=10.5120/ijca2019918913

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2019918913,
author = { Mazher Sarfaraz Khan, Sayyad Ajij D },
title = { A Performance Comparison of Reliable-AODV for MANET in NS-2, NS-3 and Qualnet },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2019 },
volume = { 178 },
number = { 15 },
month = { May },
year = { 2019 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 47-53 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume178/number15/30608-2019918913/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2019918913 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:50:30.900971+05:30
%A Mazher Sarfaraz Khan
%A Sayyad Ajij D
%T A Performance Comparison of Reliable-AODV for MANET in NS-2, NS-3 and Qualnet
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 178
%N 15
%P 47-53
%D 2019
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Ad hoc on demand distance vector is most suited for Mobile ad hoc network under random topology. MANET provide a backbone to recent wireless communication technologies. MANET in which nodes communicate with other nodes without any central support. Improvement in AODV is done by cross-layer design to avoid link crash. New ideas for cross- layer design has been suggested and implemented but it needs to be tested in the different simulator for its reliability. This paper intends to check the reliability of new ideas for cross- layer design in different simulators such as Qualnet, NS2, and NS3. Each simulator has its own feature, and they work on different platforms. Now in this paper, it will be clear that which simulator is most suitable for MANET simulation. In this paper studies and experimentation shows that NS3 and Qulanet are the best real-time simulator. Peculiarities of each simulator with its simulation settings are discussed in detail.

References
  1. A. S. Ahmed, T. S. Kumaran, S. A. Syed, and S. S. Cross, “layer design approach for power control in mobile ad hoc networks,” Egypt. Informatics J, vol. 1, no. 1–7, 2015.
  2. S. Nandgave-Usturge, “Study of congestion control using AODV and signal strength by avoiding link failure in MANET,” 2012.
  3. R. P. Kamalakkannan, “A review and design study of cross layer scheme based algorithm to reduce the link break in MANETs,” 2013.
  4. G. Bhoge, M. D. Chawhan, and Y. S. V. K, Taksande,“Cross-layer approach for energy & communication efficient protocol of mobile ad hoc networks”,© . IEEE, 2017.
  5. M. Rathehta, B. K. Pattanayak, and B. Pati, “Energy Efficient MANET Protocol Using Cross Layer Design for Military Applications,” Defence Science Journal, vol. 66, no. 2, 3 2016.
  6. “Kamrul Islam,Rong Ke Liu,“Cross-Layer Optimization of AODV Rout- ing Protocol For Mobile Ad-Hoc Network (MANET)”,Published by Atlantis Press,” 2013.
  7. D. N. Goswami, Chaturvedi and Shivjay. Singh,“Energy Aware Route Selection Algorithm for Cross Layer Design over MANET”,978-1-4673- 7231-2/15/$31.00 © . IEEE, 2015.
  8. “Anand1 T. Sasikala2, “Efficient energy optimization in mobile ad hoc network (MANET) using.”
  9. S. R. Das, C. E. Perkins, and E. M. Royer, “Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks,” 2000.
  10. A. R. Khan, S. A. Madani, K. Hayat, and S. U. Khan, “Clustering- based power-controlled routing for mobile wireless sensor networks,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 529–542, 2012.
  11. M. Karl, A Comparison of the architecture of network simulators NS-2 and TOSSIM, 1 2005.
  12. E. Weingarten, H. V. Lehn, and K. Wehrle, A perfor-mance comparison of recent network simulators, 2009.
  13. D. M. Nicol, “Comparison of Network Simulators Revisited,” 2002. [Online]. Available: htttp://www.ssfnet.org/Exchange/gallery/dumbbell/ dumbbellperformance-May02.pdf
  14. H. Sundani, H. Li, V. K. Devabhaktuni, and M. Alam, “Wireless Sensor Network Simulators A Survey and Comparisons,” International Journal of Computer Networks, vol. 2, pp. 249–265, 4 2011.
  15. B. Schilling and J. Hahner, “Qualitative Comparison of Network Simu- lation Tools, Modeling and Simulation of Computer Systems,” 2005.
  16. A. Hassan, VANET Simulation, Halmstad: University,May, 2009.
  17. S. M. Bilalb and M. Othmana, “A performance comparison of network simulators for wireless networks,” 2013.
  18. “The network simulator. ns-2.” [Online]. Available: http://www.isi.edu/ nsnam/ns.
  19. C. H. Vrije and M. Hofmann, Performance Compari-son of Reliable Multicast Protocols using the Network Simulator ns-2, 1998.
  20. P. Yinfei, “Design Routing Protocol Performance Comparision in NS2: AODV Comparing to DSR as Example,” 2010.
  21. T. R. Henderson, S. Roy, S. Floyd, and G. F. Riley, ns-3 project goals, New York, USA, 2006.
  22. G. Carneiro, P. Fortuna, and M. Ricardo, FlowMonitor - a network monitoring framework for the Network Simulator 3 (NS-3),, 2009.
  23. R. Chaudhary, S. Sethi, R. Keshari, and S. Goel, “A study of comparison of Network Simulator-3 and Network Simulator-2,” IJCSIT) Interna- tional Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3085–3092, 2012.
  24. T. Saeed, H. Gill, Q. Fei, Z. Zhang, and B. T. Loo, An Open-source and Declarative Approach to-wards Teaching Large-scale Networked Systems Programming, Toronto, Canada, 2011.
  25. A. Varga and R. Hornig, ““An overview of the OMNeT++ simulation environment,” Interna-tional Conference on Simulation Tools and Tech- niques for Communications, Networks and Systems,” 2008.
  26. A. Varga, “” THE OMNET++ DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION SYS- TEM” European Simulation Multiconference,” 2003.
  27. A. Varga and A. Y. Sekercioglu, ““Parallel Simulation Made Easy with OMNeT++” 15th European Simulation Symposium,” 2003.
  28. R. Bagrodia and R. Meyerr, “PARSEC: A Parallel Simulation Environ- ment for Complex System,” 1997.
  29. “GloMoSiM, http://pcl.cs.ucla.edu/projects/glomosim/, ac-cessed Sept 20th,” 2011.
  30. L. Bajaj, M. Takai, R. Ahuja, K. Tang, R. Bagrodia, and M. Gerla, “GloMoSiM: A Scalable Network Simulation Environment,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability - TR, 1999.
  31. X. Zeng, R. Bagrodia, and M. Gerla, GloMoSiM: A Library for parallel simulation of Large scale wireless networks, 1998.
  32. S. Siraj, A. Gupta, and R. Badgujar, “Network simulation tools survey,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Commu- nication Engineering, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 199–206, 2012.
  33. L. Hogie, P. Bouvry, and F. Guinand, An overview of manets simulation, 2006, vol. 150, no. 1.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

AODV MANET Cross layer Design NS-2 NS-3 Qualnet

Powered by PhDFocusTM