CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

An Attempt to Study the Possible Inter-relationships amongst various Selection Criteria of Main Battle Tank through ISM Methodology

by Mukesh Bansal, Remica Aggarwal
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 177 - Number 31
Year of Publication: 2020
Authors: Mukesh Bansal, Remica Aggarwal
10.5120/ijca2020919651

Mukesh Bansal, Remica Aggarwal . An Attempt to Study the Possible Inter-relationships amongst various Selection Criteria of Main Battle Tank through ISM Methodology. International Journal of Computer Applications. 177, 31 ( Jan 2020), 12-16. DOI=10.5120/ijca2020919651

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2020919651,
author = { Mukesh Bansal, Remica Aggarwal },
title = { An Attempt to Study the Possible Inter-relationships amongst various Selection Criteria of Main Battle Tank through ISM Methodology },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jan 2020 },
volume = { 177 },
number = { 31 },
month = { Jan },
year = { 2020 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 12-16 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume177/number31/31097-2020919651/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2020919651 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:47:23.678033+05:30
%A Mukesh Bansal
%A Remica Aggarwal
%T An Attempt to Study the Possible Inter-relationships amongst various Selection Criteria of Main Battle Tank through ISM Methodology
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 177
%N 31
%P 12-16
%D 2020
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Main battle tanks (MBT) have always been in the heart of all military campaigns and have enabled armies to fight across the full spectrum of war. Countries need to consider the complex interactions between criteria or factors governing the selection of main battle tank. In order to define the interaction among the criteria , this study aims to use the Interpretive Structural modeling (ISM) methodology . The criteria have been determined by consulting a group of experts.

References
  1. Madhu, V. and Bhat , T.B. 2011. Armour Protection and Affordable Protection for Futuristic Combat Vehicles, Defence Science Journal, 61(4), 394-402.
  2. Bhat, T.B.; Madhu, V. & Gupta, N.K. 2007. Perspectives in armour materials and designs. Indian National Academy of Engineers, IIT Delhi, New Delhi.
  3. Rust, Michael.2010. Passive protection concepts. In IBD Deisenroth Engineering, Eurosatory, 33-37.
  4. Madhu, V. 2010 . Advanced armour materials and technologies for battlefield systems. In International Conference on Armoured Vehicles India, New Delhi, India.
  5. Army Materials Research: Transforming land combat through new technologies. AMPTIAC Quarterly, 2004, 8(4), 1-130.
  6. NATO, Future of Armoured Forces, NATO Army Armaments Group. November 2002.
  7. Ogorkiewicz, R.M. 2002. The Outlook for Tanks. International Defense Review, 41-44.
  8. Foss, C.F. 2013. Armoured Shift. Jane’s Defence Weekly, 22-27.
  9. Hornback, P. 1998.The Wheel Versus Track Dilemma. Armor Magazine, 33-34.
  10. Anthony, H.M. 2012. Close Combat Vehicle and Leopard 2 Main Battle Tank: Back In The Heavyweight Fight. Master of Defence Studies, Canadian Forces College.
  11. Dağdeviren, M.; Yavuz, S. & Kılınç, N. 2009.Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl., 36(4), 8143-8151. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016
  12. Lee, J.; Kang, S.-H.; Rosenberger J. & Kim, S.B. 2010. A hybrid approach of goal programming for weapon systems selection. Comput. Ind. Eng., 58(3), 521–527. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2009.11.013
  13. Gupta, R. & Bhushan, N.1996. Performance evaluation of battle tanks. Def. Sci. J., 46(2), 115-119. doi: 10.14429/dsj.46.4058
  14. Cheng, C.-H. & Lin, Y. 2002. Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 142(1), 174–186. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00280-6
  15. Yong, D. & Cheng, S. 2006. Evaluating the main battle tank using fuzzy number arithmetic operations. Def. Sci. J., 56(2), 251-257. doi: 10.14429/dsj.56.1887
  16. Jiang, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, Z.-J.; Xu, D.-L. & Chen, Y.-W.2011. Weapon System Capability Assessment under uncertainty based on the evidential reasoning approach. Expert Syst. Appl., 38(11), 13773–13784. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.179
  17. Defence IQ. Global Armoured Vehicles Market Report 2015. International Armoured Vehicles XV, London, UK, 2014.
  18. Warfield , J.N. 1974. Developing interconnection matrices in Structural Modeling ,. IEEE Transactions on System , Man , and Cybernetics , SMC-4(1) , 81-87.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Main battle tank ISM methodology Armoured vehicles

Powered by PhDFocusTM