CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

The Effect of Decision-Criteria Dynamics on Network Selection for Group Calls in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks

by Enoruwa Obayiuwana, Joseph Orimolade
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 177 - Number 31
Year of Publication: 2020
Authors: Enoruwa Obayiuwana, Joseph Orimolade
10.5120/ijca2020919758

Enoruwa Obayiuwana, Joseph Orimolade . The Effect of Decision-Criteria Dynamics on Network Selection for Group Calls in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 177, 31 ( Jan 2020), 1-11. DOI=10.5120/ijca2020919758

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2020919758,
author = { Enoruwa Obayiuwana, Joseph Orimolade },
title = { The Effect of Decision-Criteria Dynamics on Network Selection for Group Calls in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jan 2020 },
volume = { 177 },
number = { 31 },
month = { Jan },
year = { 2020 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-11 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume177/number31/31096-2020919758/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2020919758 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:47:22.966370+05:30
%A Enoruwa Obayiuwana
%A Joseph Orimolade
%T The Effect of Decision-Criteria Dynamics on Network Selection for Group Calls in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 177
%N 31
%P 1-11
%D 2020
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper focuses on the network selection for group calls in heterogeneous wireless networks (HWNs) with dynamic criteria. A group call comprises multiple independent calls, such as: voice, file-download, video-streaming, online-gaming sessions, etc. that are activated concurrently on a multimode mobile node (MN). The next generation wireless networks (NGWNs) have the capability to support group calls from multimode MNs. Network selection for group calls in HWNs is a complex and multi-criteria group decision (MCGDM) problem. Existing works in the literature that addresses the network-selection problem of the vertical handover (VHO) of group calls assumes that the multiple criteria used for making network selection decisions are static. However, in NGWNs, some criteria, such as: MN’s speed, network’s service price, and network traffic load, are used for making network-selection decisions for VHO that are dynamic. The dynamics of the network selection criteria for VHO of group calls affect the choice of the most suitable selected network. Thus, it is important to consider decision criteria dynamics when making network selection decisions for the VHO of group calls in NGWNs. In this paper, a new network selection algorithm that uses a MULTlplicative-form with Multi-Objective Optimization Ratio Analysis (MULTIMOORA) for making network selection decisions for the VHO of group calls is proposed. An investigation into the effect of decision criteria dynamics on VHO decisions for group calls is carried out. The performance of the MULTIMOORA is validated by comparing it with TOPSIS, a well- known MCGDM algorithm. The performance of TOPSIS is seen to be unstable at high MN speed regions, unlike MULTIMOORA. The simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed scheme for making network- selection decisions for group calls in HWNs with dynamic multi-criteria.

References
  1. H. Beenish and M. Fahad, “5G a review on existing technologies,” pp. 1–6, 2019.
  2. D. Fang, Y. Qian, and R. Q. Hu, “Security for 5g mobile wireless networks,” 2018.
  3. L. Chen, D. Jiang, H. Song, P. Wang, R. Bao, K. Zhang, and Y. Li, “A lightweight end-side user experience data collection system for quality evaluation of multimedia communications,” 2018.
  4. O. E. Falowo and H. A. Chan, “Rat selection for multiple calls in heterogeneous wireless networks using modified topsis group decision making technique,” in Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), 2011 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on, pp. 1371–1375, 2011.
  5. A. Ajibo, F. Udechukwu, M. Chinaeke-Ogbuka, C. Nwafor, J. Nwachi-Ikpo, and C. Ani, “Review of network integration techniques for mobile broadband services in next generation network,” Nigerian Journal of Technology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 470–479, 2018.
  6. V. K. Varma, S. Ramesh, K. D. Wong, M. Barton, G. Hayward, and J. A. Friedhoffer, “Mobility management in integrated umts/wlan networks,” 2003.
  7. A. Gandhi and B. Jadhav, “Role of wireless technology for vehicular network,” International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies (IJCSIT), vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 4823–4828, 2012.
  8. S. Datta, S. Dhar, R. N. Bera, and A. Ray, “Anp based vertical handover algorithm for vehicular communication,” in Recent Advances in Information Technology (RAIT), 2012 1st International Conference on, pp. 228–234, 2012.
  9. M. Drissi and M. Oumsis, “Performance evaluation of multicriteria vertical handover for heterogeneous wireless networks,” in Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV), 2015, pp. 1–5, 2015.
  10. B. Igor and S. Andrea, “Fast multiattribute network selection technique for vertical handover in heterogeneous emergency communication systems,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2019, pp. 1–17, 2019.
  11. D. Maroua, O. Mohammed, and A. Driss, “Vikor for multicriteria network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks,” 2016.
  12. X. Wang, B. Liu, X. Su, X. Xu, and L. Xiao, “Evolutionary game based heterogeneous wireless network selection with multiple traffics in 5g,” 2019.
  13. M. Q. Khan and S. H. Andresen, “A semi and fully distributed handover algorithm for heterogeneous networks using miis,” in Computers and Communications (ISCC), 2012 IEEE Symposium on, pp. 000145–000150, 2012.
  14. J. R. Gallardo-Medina, U. Pineda-Rico, and E. Stevens- Navarro, “Vikor method for vertical handoff decision in beyond 3g wireless networks,” in Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control,CCE,2009 6th International Conference on, pp. 1–5, 2009.
  15. F. Bari and V. Leung, “Application of electre to network selection in a hetereogeneous wireless network environment,” in Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2007.WCNC 2007. IEEE, pp. 3810–3815, 2007.
  16. O. Markaki, D. Charilas, and D. Nikitopoulos, “Enhancing quality of experience in next generation networks through network selection mechanisms,” in Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2007. PIMRC 2007. IEEE 18th International Symposium on, pp. 1–5, 2007.
  17. J. D. Martinez-Morales, U. Pineda-Rico, and E. Stevens- Navarro, “Performance comparison between madm algorithms for vertical handoff in 4g networks,” in Electrical Engineering Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE), 2010 7th International Conference on, pp. 309–314, 2010.
  18. I. Kaliszewski and D. Podkopaev, “Simple additive weightinga metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 54, pp. 155–161, 7/15 2016.
  19. P. Wang, Z. Zhu, and Y. Wang, “A novel hybrid mcdm model combining the saw, topsis and gra methods based on experimental design,” Information Sciences, vol. 345, pp. 27–45, 6/1 2016.
  20. O. E. Falowo and H. A. Chan, “Effect of call dynamics of a multiservice multimode terminal on rat selection in heterogeneous wireless networks,” in Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2012 IEEE, pp. 5249–5253, 2012.
  21. O. E. Falowo and H. A. Chan, “Dynamic rat selection for multiple calls in heterogeneous wireless networks using group decision-making technique,” Computer Networks, vol. 56, pp. 1390–1401, 3/16 2012.
  22. S. A. Sharna and M. Murshed, “Impact on vertical handoff decision algorithm by the network call admission control policy in heterogeneous wireless networks,” 2012.
  23. S. Rizvi, A. Aziz, and N. M. Saad, “An overview of vertical handoff decision policies for next generation wireless networks,” 2010.
  24. R. Chai, W.-G. Zhou, Q.-B. Chen, and L. Tang, “A survey on vertical handoff decision for heterogeneous wireless networks,” 2009.
  25. P. Goyal, D. K. Lobiyal, and C. P. Katti, “Vertical handoff in heterogeneous wireless networks: A tutorial,” 2017. ID: 1.
  26. MeriemKassar, B. Kervella, and G. Pujolle, “An overview of vertical handover decision strategies in heterogeneous wireless networks,” Computer Communications, vol. 31, pp. 2607–2620, 6/25 2008.
  27. S. Mane and R. Nasri, “Handoff and network selection stratergy in next generation networks,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering (IJARCCE), vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 304–308, 2016.
  28. R. Katru, M. Iqbal, and M. Prasad, “A survey on vertical handover in heterogeneous networks,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 132– 136, 2016.
  29. Z. Yue, “Topsis-based group decision-making methodology in intuitionistic fuzzy setting,” Information Sciences, vol. 277, pp. 141–153, 9/1 2014.
  30. T. Balezentis and A. Balezentis, “A survey on development and applications of the multi-criteria decision making method multimoora,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 21, no. 3-4, pp. 209–222, 2014.
  31. W. Brauers and E. K. Zavadskas, “Project management by multimoora as an instrument for transition economies,” Technological and economic development of economy, Baltic Journal on Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 5–24, 2010.
  32. W. K. M. Brauers and EdmundasKazimierasZavadskas, “Multimoora optimization used to decide on a bank loan to buy property,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 17, pp. 174–188, 03/22; 2015/06 2011. doi: 10.3846/13928619.2011.560632; 09.
  33. W. K. M. Brauers, E. K. Zavadskas, and SimonaKildien, “Was the construction sector in 20 european countries anti-cyclical during the recession years 2008-2009 as measured by multicriteria analysis (multimoora)?,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 31, no. 0, pp. 949–956, 2014.
  34. T. Kaya and CengizKahraman, “Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy topsis methodology,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, pp. 6577– 6585, 6 2011.
  35. O. E. Falowo, SheraliZeadally, and H. A. Chan, “Dynamic pricing for load-balancing in user-centric joint call admission control of next-generation wireless networks,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 335– 368, 2010.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Dynamic multi-criteria Group calls Network selection Multicriteria group decision- making