CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Real Time Pedestrian Detection-based Faster HOG/DPM and Deep Learning Approaches

by R. Khemmar, Li. Delong, B. Decoux
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 176 - Number 42
Year of Publication: 2020
Authors: R. Khemmar, Li. Delong, B. Decoux
10.5120/ijca2020920539

R. Khemmar, Li. Delong, B. Decoux . Real Time Pedestrian Detection-based Faster HOG/DPM and Deep Learning Approaches. International Journal of Computer Applications. 176, 42 ( Jul 2020), 34-38. DOI=10.5120/ijca2020920539

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2020920539,
author = { R. Khemmar, Li. Delong, B. Decoux },
title = { Real Time Pedestrian Detection-based Faster HOG/DPM and Deep Learning Approaches },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jul 2020 },
volume = { 176 },
number = { 42 },
month = { Jul },
year = { 2020 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 34-38 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume176/number42/31485-2020920539/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2020920539 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:41:09.336110+05:30
%A R. Khemmar
%A Li. Delong
%A B. Decoux
%T Real Time Pedestrian Detection-based Faster HOG/DPM and Deep Learning Approaches
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 176
%N 42
%P 34-38
%D 2020
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The work presented aims to show the feasibility of scientific and technological concepts in embedded vision dedicated to the extraction of image characteristics allowing the detection and the recognition/localization of objects. Object and pedestrian detection are carried out by two methods: 1. Classical image processing approach, which are improved with Histogram Oriented Gradient (HOG) and Deformable Part Model (DPM) based detection and pattern recognition. We present how we have improved the HOG/DPM approach to make pedestrian detection as a real time task by reducing calculation time. The developed approach allows us not only a pedestrian detection but also calculates the distance between pedestrians and vehicle. 2. Pedestrian detection based Artificial Intelligence (AI) approaches such as Deep Learning (DL). This work has first been validated on a closed circuit and subsequently under real traffic conditions through mobile platforms (mobile robot, drone and vehicles). Several tests have been carried out in the city centre of Rouen in order to validate the platform developed.

References
  1. H. Cho, P. E. Rybski, A. B-Hillel, W. Zheng.: Real-time Pedestrian Detection with Deformable Part Models.
  2. Caltech Pedestrian Detection Benchmark Homepage, http://www.vision.caltech.edu/Image_Datasets/CaltechPedestrians/, last accessed 2018/01/14.
  3. Felzenszwalb, P., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. A discriminatively trained, multiscale, deformable part model. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008. CVPR 2008. IEEE Conference on (pp. 1-8). IEEE (June 2008).
  4. Jong-Chyi Su.: State of the Art object Detection Algorithms. University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr. La Jolla, CA.
  5. Koen E. A. van de Sande, Jasper R. R. Uijlings, TheoGevers, Arnold W. M. Smeulders, Segmentation As Se-lective Search for Object Recognition, ICCV, 2011.
  6. Alex Krizhevsky , Ilya Sutskever , Geoffrey E. Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neuralnetworks, , NIPS, 2012.
  7. Ross Girshick, Jeff Donahue, Trevor Darrell, Jitendra Malik, Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object de-tection and semantic segmentation, CVPR, 2014.
  8. Piotr Dollar, Christian Wojek, Bernt Schiele.: Pedestrian Detection: An Evaluation of the State of the Art. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,Volume: 34, Issue: 4, April 2012.
  9. D. G. Lowe. Distinct Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. Computer Science Department. University of British Columbia. Vancouver, B. C. Canada. January, 5, 2004 28
  10. Kanade-Lucas-Tomasi. KLT Feature Tracker. Computer Vision Lab. Jae Kyu Suhr. Computer Vision (EEE6503) Fall 2009, Yonsei Uni.
  11. J. M. Odobez and P. Bouthemy. Robust Multiresolution Estimation of Parametric Motion Models. IRIS/INRIA Rennes, Campus de Beaulieu, February, 13, 1995.
  12. Object Detection Homepage, http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~jcsu/reports/ObjectDetection.pdf, last accessed 2018/01/14.
  13. Yan, J., Lei, Z., Wen, L., & Li, S. Z. (2014). The fastest deformable part model for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 2497-2504).
  14. Yolo Homepage, https://pjreddie.com/darknet/yolo/, last accessed 2018/01/19.
  15. Koen E. A. van de Sande, Jasper R. R. Uijlings, Theo Gevers, Arnold W. M. Smeulders, Segmentation As Se-lective Search for Object Recognition, ICCV, 2011.
  16. Alex Krizhevsky , Ilya Sutskever , Geoffrey E. Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. NIPS, 2012.
  17. Dave Gershgon, Google’s Robot Are Learning How to Pick Things Up. Popular Science, March 8, 2016.
  18. Andreas Geiger, Philip Lenz, Christoph Stiller, Raquel Urtasun. Object Detection Evaluation. The Kitti Vision Benchmark Suite. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
  19. Eddie Forson. Understanding SSD MultiBox-Real Time Object Detection in Deep Learning. Towards Data Science.
  20. Liu W., Anguelov D., Erhan D., Szegedy C., Reed S., Fu C.-Y., Berg A. C., (2016, déc.). Single-Shot Multibox Detector. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.02325.
  21. Levine S., Pastor P., Krizhevsky A., Ibarz J., Quillen D. (2017, June). Learning Hand-Eye Coordination for Robotic Grasping with DeepLearning and Large-Scale Data Collection. The International Journal of Robotics Research.
  22. Chabot F., Chaouch M., Rabarisoa J., Teulière C., Château T.,. (2017, July). Deep MANTA: A Coarse-to-fine Many-Task Network for joint 2D and 3D vehicle analysis from monocular image. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
  23. Mousavian A., Anguelov D., Flynn J., Kosecka J. (2017, July). 3D Bounding Box Estimation Using Deep Learning and Geometry. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
  24. Piotr Doll, Christian Wojek, Bernt Schiele, and Pietro Perona. Pedestrian Detection: An Evaluation of the State of the Art. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
  25. Junjie Yan, Xucong Zhang, Zhen Lei, Shengcai Liao, Stan Z. Li. Robust Multi-Resolution Pedestrian Detection in Traffic Scenes. Computer Vision Foundation. CVPR2013.
  26. http://www.bmw.com/com/en/insights/technology/efficientdynamics/phase_2/, last accessed 2018/01/14.
  27. P. Viola, M. Jones. Rapid Object Detection using a Boosted Cascade of Simple Features. Computer Vision and Pattern Recongition Conferencies. 2001.
  28. Georgakis G., Mousavian A., Berg A. C., Kosecka J. (2017, July). Synthesizing Training Data for Object Detection in Indoor Scenes. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  29. Multibox SSD Homepage, https://towardsdatascience.com/understanding-ssd-multibox-real-time-object-detection-in-deep-learning-495ef744fab. Last accessed 2018/01/20.
  30. Z. Chen, R. Khemmar, B. Decoux, A. Atahouet, and J-Y. Ertaud. Real Time Pedestrian and Object Detection and Tracking-based Deep Learning: Application to Drone Visual Tracking. 27th International Conference in Central Europe onComputer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision (WSCG), 2019, Plzen, Czech Republic, May 27–30, 2019.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Pedestrian detection pattern recognition object detection HOG DPM ADAS Systems tracking deep learning.