We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

A Comparative Performance Analysis of 6to4 Transition Mechanism over MPLS and Frame Relay using OPNET

by Oliver Kufuor Boansi, Michael Asante
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 176 - Number 29
Year of Publication: 2020
Authors: Oliver Kufuor Boansi, Michael Asante
10.5120/ijca2020920316

Oliver Kufuor Boansi, Michael Asante . A Comparative Performance Analysis of 6to4 Transition Mechanism over MPLS and Frame Relay using OPNET. International Journal of Computer Applications. 176, 29 ( Jun 2020), 9-16. DOI=10.5120/ijca2020920316

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2020920316,
author = { Oliver Kufuor Boansi, Michael Asante },
title = { A Comparative Performance Analysis of 6to4 Transition Mechanism over MPLS and Frame Relay using OPNET },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jun 2020 },
volume = { 176 },
number = { 29 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2020 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 9-16 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume176/number29/31382-2020920316/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2020920316 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:43:45.545937+05:30
%A Oliver Kufuor Boansi
%A Michael Asante
%T A Comparative Performance Analysis of 6to4 Transition Mechanism over MPLS and Frame Relay using OPNET
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 176
%N 29
%P 9-16
%D 2020
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

IPv6 addressing is taking over from IPv4 with the exhaustion of the latter’s address space. However, both versions of IP are incompatible hence the need for transition technologies to ensure their coexistence. This research analyzed the performance of the 6to4 transition mechanism when it ran over two separate WAN technologies namely MPLS and Frame Relay by way of simulating the scenarios using OPNET 14.5. Traffic generated for this analysis were from FTP, Email and Database query, and were used to measure and analyze performance metrics such as end-to-end delay, response time and point to point link utilization over an hour of simulation time to ascertain which WAN and transition mechanism provided the best performance. The simulation values at the end of the research indicated that 6to4 together with MPLS produced lower values for all the performance metrics studied.

References
  1. NRO (2011). Free pool of IPv4 address space depleted. Number Resource Organization Publications, Feb. 2011. [Online accessed 13-03-2020] http://www.nro.net/news/IPv4-free-pool-depleted.
  2. Graeme, C. (2014). Why Is The Transition To IPv6 Taking So Long? [Blog post]. Accessed on 13/03/2020 from http://teamarin.net/2014/08/13/transition-ipv6-taking-long/
  3. Govil, J., & N. Kaur. (2008). An examination of IPv4 and IPv6 networks: Constraints and various transition mechanisms. Southeastcon, IEEE.
  4. Babar, A. K., Zardari, Z. A., Sirajuddin Qureshi, S. H., & Hussaini, N. N. (2019). Assessment of IPv4 and IPv6 Networks with Different Modified Tunneling Techniques using OPNET. Assessment, 10(9).
  5. Suhail, A., Wajid A., H., & Mohsin H., M. (2015). Performance Evaluation of IPv4 and IPv6 over MPLS Using OPNET. International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 125, No.3, pp. 0975-8887.
  6. Grayeli, P., Sarkani, S., & Mazzuchi, T. (2012). Performance analysis of IPv6 transition mechanisms over MPLS. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, Vol.4, No.2.
  7. Rani, S., & Vandana. (2015). Performance evaluation of IPV6 transition technologies. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology (IJARCET), Vol.4, Issue 6.
  8. Khannah, B., & Alsadeh, A. (2017). Impact of IPv4/IPv6 Transition Techniques on Applications Performance.
  9. Albkerat, A., & Issac, B. (2014). Analysis of IPV6 Transition Technologies. International journal of Computer Networks & Communications, -. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcnc.2014.6502
  10. Georgescu, M., Hazeyama, H., Kadobayashi, Y., & Yamaguchi, S. (2014). Empirical analysis of IPv6 transition technologies using the IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed. In International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures (pp. 216-228). Springer, Cham.
  11. Wu, Y., & Zhou, X. (2011). Research on the IPv6 performance analysis based on dual-protocol stack and tunnel transition. In 2011 6th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) (pp. 1091-1093). IEEE.
  12. Hossain, M. A.,Podder, D., Jahan, S., & Hussain, M.(2016). Performance Analysis of Three Transition Mechanisms between IPv6 Network and IPv4 Network: Dual Stack, Tunneling and Translation. International Journal of Computer (IJC). 20. 217-228.
  13. Kalwar, S., Bohra, N., & Memon, A. A. (2015). A survey of transition mechanisms from IPv4 to IPv6—Simulated test bed and analysis. In 2015 Third International Conference on Digital Information, Networking, and Wireless Communications (DINWC) (pp. 30-34). IEEE.
  14. Singalar, S., & Banakar, R. M. (2018). Performance analysis of IPv4 to IPv6 transition mechanisms. In 2018 Fourth International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (ICCUBEA) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  15. Kim, P. S. (2017). Analysis and comparison of tunneling based IPv6 transition mechanisms. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(6), 894-897.
  16. Carpenter, B., & Moore, K. (2001). Connection of IPv6 domains via IPv4 Clouds, Internet Engineering Taskforce RFC 3056. Retrieved from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3056
  17. Wu, J., Cui, Y., Li, X., Xu, M., & Metz, C. (2010). 4over6 transit solution using IP encapsulation and MP-BGP extensions. IETF RFC5747. Retrieved from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5747
  18. Nordmark, E., & Gilligan, R. (2005). Basic transition mechanisms for IPv6 hosts and routers. RFC 4213, October. Retrieved from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4213
  19. Cui, Y., Wu, J., Wu, P., Vautrin, O., & Lee, Y. (2013). Public IPv4-over-IPv6 access network. IEEE RFC 7040. Retrieved from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7040
  20. Okoh, K. E., Asante, M., & Agbenyegah F., K. (2016). Investigating and Evaluating of Network Failures and Performance over Distributed WAN in Application Protocol Layer. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, Vol. 5, Issue 01, ISSN 2277-8616, pp. 153-159.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Transition Mechanisms 6to4 MPLS Frame Relay OPNET WAN IPv4 IPv6.

Powered by PhDFocusTM