CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Risk Management Assessment on Human Resource Information Technology Services using COBIT 5

by Muhammad Nur Fuad, Imam Riadi
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 175 - Number 23
Year of Publication: 2020
Authors: Muhammad Nur Fuad, Imam Riadi
10.5120/ijca2020920756

Muhammad Nur Fuad, Imam Riadi . Risk Management Assessment on Human Resource Information Technology Services using COBIT 5. International Journal of Computer Applications. 175, 23 ( Oct 2020), 12-19. DOI=10.5120/ijca2020920756

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2020920756,
author = { Muhammad Nur Fuad, Imam Riadi },
title = { Risk Management Assessment on Human Resource Information Technology Services using COBIT 5 },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Oct 2020 },
volume = { 175 },
number = { 23 },
month = { Oct },
year = { 2020 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 12-19 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume175/number23/31590-2020920756/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2020920756 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:40:48.651872+05:30
%A Muhammad Nur Fuad
%A Imam Riadi
%T Risk Management Assessment on Human Resource Information Technology Services using COBIT 5
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 175
%N 23
%P 12-19
%D 2020
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Human Resources in Higher Education is engaged in the development of lecturers and employees, the main business process uses Information Technology as its service base. Business processes can run properly then it takes risk management, Human Resources in Higher Education requires risk management to the business process that runs. COBIT 5 is here to address the challenges of this modern era, especially in risk management. The need for a risk assessment to measure how far risk management is applied by elements in Human Resources in Higher Education, the purpose of the study is knowing capability level values, Gap values, and recommendations based on the results of risk management assessments. The risk management assessment in this study uses the COBIT framework 5 domain process APO12 including the stages of data collection, risk analysis, risk profile, articulating risk, risk tolerance value, and how to respond to risk. Research Method using Quantitative Analysis. The data was obtained using questionnaire dissemination techniques, direct observes, and interviews calculated using the Guttman method. RACI Chart is supportive in determining appropriate respondents. The results of the study found a capability level value in domain APO12 of 2.60 meaning at this level the implementation of business processes in Human Resources in higher education has carried out planning, supervision, and adjustment, and its work has been established, observed, and maintained properly. APO12 has a Gap value of 1 level this is the basis for making recommendations. This research has gone well following the expected research objectives.

References
  1. Soejanto, Joshua, and Andi Reza Perdanakusuma. 2018. "Evaluation of Information Technology Governance at PT. Aerofood Indonesia Soekarno Hatta Airport Cengkareng By Using.”Journal of Information Technology Development and Computer Science (J-PTIIK) Universitas Brawijaya 2 (11): 4714–21.
  2. Arief, M Habibullah. 2018. "Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management Using the COBIT 5 Framework (Case Study at Perum Jasa Tirta I Malang)." Journal of Information Technology Development and Computer Science 2.
  3. Setyaningrum, Novia Dwi, Suprapto, and Ari Kusyanti. 2018. "Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management Using the COBIT 5 Framework (Case Study: PT. Kimia Farma (Persero) Tbk - Watudakon Plant)." Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science Development 2 (1): 143–52.
  4. Megawati, and Syntia Ana. 2018. "Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management Using the COBIT 5 Framework." Scientific Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management 4 (2): 118–22.
  5. Firdaus, Nurfitri Zukhrufatul. 2018. "Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management Using COBIT 5 IT Risk (Case Study: PT. Petrokimia Gresik)." Journal of Information Technology Development and Computer Science 2 (1): 91–100.
  6. Nanda Putra Wandita. 2014. "Evaluation of Information Technology Governance in Distance Education Systems Using the COBIT 5 Framework (Case Study: College of Police Science-Police Science College." Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta.
  7. ISACA. 2012a. Trust And Partnership A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT.
  8. ISACA. 2012b. “COBIT 5.0. 2012. Main Framework Version 2.0.
  9. ISACA. 2012c. Isaca COBIT 5 Implementation.
  10. Arikunto, S. 2010. Research Procedures A Practical Approach. Rineka Cipta.
  11. ITGI.IT Governance institute. 2007.COBIT 4.1.IT Governance Institute.
  12. Jogiyanto, A. 2011. Information Technology Governance System. Publisher Andi.
  13. Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. 2019. Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods and R & D. M. Dr. Ir. Sutopo.S.Pd (ed.); 1st ed. ALFABETA, cv, Jalan Gegerkalong Hilir No. 84.
  14. Putri,C.U. 2017. Risk Assessment of Information Technology Processes Based on the COBIT 5 Framework in the Helpdesk of the Sub-Directorate of Technology Services and Information Systems, Directorate of Information Technology and Information Systems Development (DPTSI) Sepuluh Institute of Technology. 241.
  15. S.Gondodiyoto. 2007. The Information Systems Audit and COBIT Approach.
  16. Stewart,JamesM,:Chapple,Mike;Gibson,D. 2015.CISSP (ISC)2 Certified Information Systems Security Professional Official Study Guide, 7th Edition.Wiley
  17. Surendro, K. 2009.Implementation of Information Technology Governance, Information Technology
  18. Yunanda. 2009. Evaluation. http://repository.usu.ac.id /bits ream/ 123456789 /19622/4/Chapter II.pdf
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Risk Management Capability Level Gap RACI Chart Guttman