CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Mitigating Inter-Symbol Interference using Blind Equalizer in a Wireless Communication System

by Nadeem Ullah Khan, Aftab Hussain, Mudassar Nawaz
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 175 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2017
Authors: Nadeem Ullah Khan, Aftab Hussain, Mudassar Nawaz
10.5120/ijca2017915475

Nadeem Ullah Khan, Aftab Hussain, Mudassar Nawaz . Mitigating Inter-Symbol Interference using Blind Equalizer in a Wireless Communication System. International Journal of Computer Applications. 175, 2 ( Oct 2017), 5-10. DOI=10.5120/ijca2017915475

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2017915475,
author = { Nadeem Ullah Khan, Aftab Hussain, Mudassar Nawaz },
title = { Mitigating Inter-Symbol Interference using Blind Equalizer in a Wireless Communication System },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Oct 2017 },
volume = { 175 },
number = { 2 },
month = { Oct },
year = { 2017 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 5-10 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume175/number2/28458-2017915475/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2017915475 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:23:58.048282+05:30
%A Nadeem Ullah Khan
%A Aftab Hussain
%A Mudassar Nawaz
%T Mitigating Inter-Symbol Interference using Blind Equalizer in a Wireless Communication System
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 175
%N 2
%P 5-10
%D 2017
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In modern world communication where multiple signal samples are transmitted at a time, a problematic phenomenon occurs called Inter symbol interference (ISI). In this phenomenon samples are affected by previous and next samples. This happens due to difference in the propagation delays over same path because of which symbols interact with each other at multiple points and over all signal is disturbed. Band limitation and multipath propagations are key issues of this phenomenon. Transmitted signal already contains white noise etc. The signal is affected by additive white noise as well. A suitable technique for reducing this ISI effect is adaptive method. Due to varying nature of noise detection, adaptive behavior of equalizer is necessary for effective mitigation. Adaptive algorithm requires a known training sequence to track time varying characteristics of the channel. Here the characteristics of channel are point of focus for the equalizers. Blind algorithms have a concept that they track time varying properties of channel as consequence of limitation in training sequence. The paper deals with the designing of equalizers using different modulation techniques. Results are applied over two wireless channels using three different wireless access techniques. The equalizer works as a blind equalizer since it treats the signals without any training pattern thus making this idea innovative. A comprehensive analysis based results are inferred to ensure the proper equalization model to reduce the ISI effect.

References
  1. Hodges, M.R., 1990. The GSM radio interface. British Telecom Technology Journal, 8(1), pp.31-43.
  2. Sato, Y., 1975. A method of self-recovering equalization for multilevel amplitude-modulation systems. IEEE Transactions on communications, 23(6), pp.679-682.
  3. Abrar, S., Zerguine, A. and Nandi, A.K., 2012. Adaptive blind channel equalization. Digital Communication, InTech Publishers, Rijeka, Croatia, pp.93-118.
  4. Jones, D.L., 1995, October. A normalized constant-modulus algorithm. In Signals, Systems and Computers, 1995. 1995 Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth Asilomar Conference on (Vol. 1, pp. 694-697). IEEE.
  5. Gitlin, R. and Mazo, J., 1973. Comparison of some cost functions for automatic equalization. IEEE Transactions on communications, 21(3), pp.233-237.
  6. Sato, Y., 1975. A method of self-recovering equalization for multilevel amplitude-modulation systems. IEEE Transactions on communications,23(6), pp.679-682.
  7. Godard, D., 1980. Self-recovering equalization and carrier tracking in two-dimensional data communication systems. IEEE transactions on communications, 28(11), pp.1867-1875.
  8. Wesolowski, K., 1987. Self-recovering adaptive equalization algorithms for digital radio and voiceband data modems. In Proc. European Conf. Circuit Theory and Design (pp. 19-24).
  9. Ruget, G. (1980a). Analysis of stochastic approximation schemes with discontinous and dependent forcing terms with applications to data communications algorithms, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 25(12): 1042–1058
  10. Yuan, J.T. and Tsai, K.D., 2005. Analysis of multi modulus blind equalization algorithm in QAM communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 53(9), pp.1427-1431.
  11. Li, Y. and Ding, Z., 1995. Convergence analysis of finite length blind adaptive equalizers. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 43(9), pp.2120-2129.
  12. Liu, D. and Tong, L., 1999. An analysis of constant modulus algorithm for array signal processing. Signal Processing, 73(1), pp.81-104.
  13. Zhang, L., Montage Technology Group, Ltd, 2009. Hybrid modulus blind equalization for quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) receivers. U.S. Patent 7,599,449.
  14. Ram Babu, T. and Kumar, P.R., 2010. Blind Equalization using Constant Modulus Algorithm and Multi-Modulus Algorithm in Wireless Communication Systems. International Journal of Computer Applications, 1(3), pp.50-55.
  15. Abrar, S. and Nandi, A.K., 2008, August. Normalized constant modulus algorithm for blind channel equalization. In Signal Processing Conference, 2008 16th European (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
  16. Ding, Z. & Li, Y. (2001). Blind Equalization and Identification, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
  17. Moshirian, Sanaz, Soheil Ghadami, and Mohammad Havaei. "Blind Channel Equalization." arXiv preprint arXiv: 1208.2205 (2012).
  18. D. L. Jones, “A normalized constant-modulus algorithm”, Proceedings of 29th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA,USA, vol.2, pp.694-697, October 1999
  19. Haykin, S. (1996). Adaptive Filtering Theory, Prentice-Hall.
  20. Lucky, R. (1966). Techniques for adaptive equalization of digital communication systems, The Bell Systems Technical Journal pp. 255–286.
  21. Widrow, B. & Hoff, M.E. (1960). Adaptive switching circuits, Proc. IRE WESCON Conf. Rec. pp. 96–104.
  22. Allen, J. & Mazo, J. (1973). Comparison of some cost functions for automatic equalization, IEEE Trans. Commun. 21(3): 233–237.
  23. Sato, Y. (1975). A method of self-recovering equalization for multilevel amplitude modulation systems, IEEE Trans. Commun. 23(6): 679–682.
  24. Godard, D. (1980). Self-recovering equalization and carrier tracking in two-dimensional data communications systems, IEEE Trans. Commun. 28(11): 1867–1875
  25. Wesolowski, K. (1987). Self-recovering adaptive equalization algorithms for digital radio and voiceband data modems, Proc. European Conf. Circuit Theory and Design pp. 19–24.
  26. Shafayat, Azzedine, “Adaptive Blind Channel Equalization”, Published online 07, March, 2012 Published in print edition March, 2012
  27. Bellini, S. (1986). Bussgang techniques for blind equalization, Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM’86 pp. 1634–1640.
  28. Ruget, G. (1980a). Analysis of stochastic approximation schemes with discontinous and dependent forcing terms with applications to data communications algorithms, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 25(12): 1042–1058
  29. Shalvi, O. & Weinstein, E. (1990). New criteria for blind equalization of non-minimum phase systems, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 36(2): 312–321.
  30. K Suthendran, Performance Comparison of Blind Equalization Algorithms for Wireless Communication, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887), Volume 85 – No 13, January 2014.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

ISI Blind Equalization QAM Rayleigh Rician QPSK Equalizers CMA MMA SCA BPSK QPSK Convergence