We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Classifying Student’s Learning Experience using Improved Apriori and CART

by Pooja Verma, Rajesh Boghey, Sandeep Rai
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 174 - Number 1
Year of Publication: 2017
Authors: Pooja Verma, Rajesh Boghey, Sandeep Rai
10.5120/ijca2017915311

Pooja Verma, Rajesh Boghey, Sandeep Rai . Classifying Student’s Learning Experience using Improved Apriori and CART. International Journal of Computer Applications. 174, 1 ( Sep 2017), 34-40. DOI=10.5120/ijca2017915311

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2017915311,
author = { Pooja Verma, Rajesh Boghey, Sandeep Rai },
title = { Classifying Student’s Learning Experience using Improved Apriori and CART },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Sep 2017 },
volume = { 174 },
number = { 1 },
month = { Sep },
year = { 2017 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 34-40 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume174/number1/28374-2017915311/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2017915311 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:21:02.083111+05:30
%A Pooja Verma
%A Rajesh Boghey
%A Sandeep Rai
%T Classifying Student’s Learning Experience using Improved Apriori and CART
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 174
%N 1
%P 34-40
%D 2017
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Here in this paper a new of classifying Student’s learning experience on online social networks such as facebook, twitter is proposed which helps to find various issues and problems in their educational experiences. The existing technique implemented for the classification for the Student's learning experience provides multi-label classification to reflect various problems but fails to provide the improvement in accuracy, hence a new multi-label classification using improved Apriori algorithm is proposed which generates a set of candidate rules and finally classify Student's experience using Classification & Regression Tree. The proposed methodology implemented provides better results in comparison with an existing technique. The experimental results are performed and tested on various parameters such as precision and recall and final Score. The various student's learning experience and their classification is done here using Fuzzy-Apriori and CART provide and better way to final and issue problems in various fields.

References
  1. Z. Fadika, E. Dede, M. Govindaraju, and L. Ramakrishnan. Benchmarking MapReduce implementations for application usage scenarios. In GRID 2011
  2. Yadagiri S, Thalluri P V S. Information technology on surge: information literacy on demand. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 2011, 32(1):64-69.
  3. Cohen J, Dolan B, Dunlap M, Hellerstein JM, Welton C. MAD skills: New analysis practices for big data [J]. PVLDB, 2009, 2(2):14811492.
  4. Randal E. Bryant & Joan Disney. Data-Intensive Supercomputing: The case for DISC [R].2007.10: 1-14.
  5. John Boyle. Biology must develop its own big-data systems.Nature. 2008, 499(7): 7.
  6. Wang Yuan-Zhuo, Jin Xiao-Long, Chen Xue-Qi. Network Big Data: Present and Future [J].Chinese Journal of Computer. 2013, 36(6):1125-1138.
  7. B. Cooper et al. Benchmarking cloud serving systems with yes. In SOCC 2010.
  8. Z. Fadika, E. Dede, M. Govindaraju, and L. Ramakrishnan. Benchmarking MapReduce implementations for application usage scenarios. In GRID 2011
  9. M. Ferdman et al. clearing the clouds, a study of emerging scale-out workloads on modern hardware. In ASPLOS 2012.
  10. Lei Wang, Jianfeng Zhan, ChunjieLuo, “BigDataBench: a Big Data Benchmark Suite from Internet Services” High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), IEEE 20th International Symposium on2014.
  11. Yadagiri S, Thalluri P V S. Information technology on surge: information literacy on demand. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 2011, 32(1):64-69.
  12. Cohen J, Dolan B, Dunlap M, Hellerstein JM, Welton C. MAD skills: New analysis practices for big data [J]. PVLDB, 2009, 2(2):14811492.
  13. Randal E. Bryant & Joan Disney. Data-Intensive Supercomputing: The case for DISC [R].2007.10: 1-14.
  14. John Boyle. Biology must develop its own big-data systems.Nature. 2008, 499(7): 7.
  15. Wang Yuan-Zhuo, Jin Xiao-Long, Chen Xue-Qi. Network Big Data: Present and Future [J].Chinese Journal of Computer. 2013, 36(6):1125-1138.
  16. B. Cooper et al. Benchmarking cloud serving systems with yes. In SOCC 2010.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Online Social Network Apriori algorithm Fuzzy rules Classification & Regression Tree Decision Tree.