We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Reseach Article

On M-ambiguity of Words corresponding to a Parikh Matrix

by Amrita Bhattacharjee
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 173 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2017
Authors: Amrita Bhattacharjee
10.5120/ijca2017915439

Amrita Bhattacharjee . On M-ambiguity of Words corresponding to a Parikh Matrix. International Journal of Computer Applications. 173, 9 ( Sep 2017), 44-48. DOI=10.5120/ijca2017915439

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2017915439,
author = { Amrita Bhattacharjee },
title = { On M-ambiguity of Words corresponding to a Parikh Matrix },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Sep 2017 },
volume = { 173 },
number = { 9 },
month = { Sep },
year = { 2017 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 44-48 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume173/number9/28365-2017915439/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2017915439 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:20:50.539807+05:30
%A Amrita Bhattacharjee
%T On M-ambiguity of Words corresponding to a Parikh Matrix
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 173
%N 9
%P 44-48
%D 2017
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

M-ambiguous words are the problem of Parikh matrix. In this paper an algorithm is introduced to find the M-ambiguous ternary words corresponding to a 4x4 matrix. The concept of M-ambiguity Reduction factor is introduced. With the help of this M-ambiguity Reduction factor the problem of M-ambiguity can be solved to some extent.

References
  1. Atanasiu, A. 2007. Binary amiable words, Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci 18(2), 387- 400.
  2. Atanasiu, A., Atanasiu, R and Petre, I. 2008. Parikh matrices and amiable words, Theoretical Computer Science 390, 102--109.
  3. Atanasiu, A., Vide C.M. and Mateescu, A. 2001. On the injectivity of the parikh matrix mapping, Fundam. Informa. 46,1-11.
  4. Bhattacharjee, A and Purkayastha, B.S. 2014. Parikh matrices and words over tertiary ordered alphabet, International Journal of Computer Applications 85(4), 10-15.
  5. Bhattacharjee, A and Purkayastha, B.S. 2014.Application of ratio property in searching of m-ambiguous words and its generalization, 3rd International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving, AISC (SocProS 2013), Springer India 258, 857-865.
  6. Bhattacharjee, A and Purkayastha, B.S. 2014. Some alternative ways to find M-ambiguous binary words corresponding to a Parikh matrix, International Journal on Computational Sciences and Applications (IJCSA) 4(1),53-64.
  7. Bhattacharjee, A and Purkayastha, B.S. 2014. Parikh matrices and words over ternary alphabet, 4th International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving, AISC (SocProS 2014), Springer India 335,135-145.
  8. Ding, C and Salomaa, A. 2006. On some problems of Mateescu concerning sub word occurences, Fundamenta Informaticae 72, 1-15.
  9. Mateescu, A., Salomaa, A., Salomaa, K and Yu, S. 2001 A sharpening of the parikh mapping, Theoret. Informetics Appl. 35,551-564.
  10. Mateescu, A., Salomaa, A., Salomaa, K and Yu, S. 2001. On an extension of the Parikh mapping, T.U.C.S Technical Report No 364.
  11. Mateescu, A., Salomaa, A and Yu, S. 2004. Subword histories and parikh matrices, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 68, 1-21.
  12. Mateescu, A and Salomaa, A. 2004. Matrix indicators for subword occurences and ambiguity, Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 15, 277-292.
  13. Parikh, R.J. 1966. On the context-free languages, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 13, 570-581.
  14. Salomaa, A. 2003. Counting (scattered) subwords, EATCS Bulletin 81, 165-179.
  15. Salomaa, A. 2005. Connections between subwords and certain matrix mappings, Theoretical Computer Science 340,188-203.
  16. Salomaa, A. 2006. Independence of certain quantities indicating subword occurrences, Theoretical Computer Science 362(1), 222-231.
  17. Salomaa, A. et. al, 2006. Subword conditions and subword histories, Information and Computation 204, 1741-1755.
  18. Serbanuta, V.N. and Serbanuta. T.F. 2006. Injectivity of the Parikh matrix mappings revisited, Fundamenta Informaticae, XX, IOS Press, 1-19.
  19. Subramanian, K.G., Huey, A. M and Nagar, A. K. 2009. On parikh matrices, Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 20(2), 211-219.
  20. Subramanian, K.G., Isawasan, P and Venkat, I. 2013.Parikh matrices and istrail morphism, Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 9(1), 5-9.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Parikh matrix sub word amiable words or M- ambiguous words.