CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

SDLC Model Selection Tool and Risk Incorporation

by Prachal Agarwal, Aroshi Singhal, Archit Garg
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 172 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2017
Authors: Prachal Agarwal, Aroshi Singhal, Archit Garg
10.5120/ijca2017915143

Prachal Agarwal, Aroshi Singhal, Archit Garg . SDLC Model Selection Tool and Risk Incorporation. International Journal of Computer Applications. 172, 10 ( Aug 2017), 6-10. DOI=10.5120/ijca2017915143

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2017915143,
author = { Prachal Agarwal, Aroshi Singhal, Archit Garg },
title = { SDLC Model Selection Tool and Risk Incorporation },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Aug 2017 },
volume = { 172 },
number = { 10 },
month = { Aug },
year = { 2017 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 6-10 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume172/number10/28285-2017915143/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2017915143 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:19:57.704968+05:30
%A Prachal Agarwal
%A Aroshi Singhal
%A Archit Garg
%T SDLC Model Selection Tool and Risk Incorporation
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 172
%N 10
%P 6-10
%D 2017
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Software Engineering is systematic method of development of software. SDLC lists all the processes and tasks for a developing a software. Choosing right model is very crucial as based on it development and testing processes are carried out. Also error has a cascading effect in SDLC. In this paper, a number of existing SDLC Models (waterfall, V shaped, prototype and RAD), used to develop softwares commercially are discussed and compared with each other. This comparison is used as basis to propose a tool that helps to identify the best suited model for the current project. Also the risk management activities are incorporated in the models itself as compared to a standalone activity. Thus, a resource efficient product is developed.

References
  1. Boehm, B.W. 1988. A Spiral Model for Software Development and Enhancement. IEEE Computer Society. vol 21, issue 5, (May 1988), 61 – 72.
  2. Royce, W.W. 1970. Managing the Development of Large Software Systems: Concepts and Techniques. IEEE Computer Society. (August 1970), 1-9.
  3. Davis, .A. M., Bersoff, H. E, and Comer, R. A Strategy for Comparing Alternative Software Development Life Cycle Models. IEEE Trans. on Software Eng. Vol. 14, Issue 10, (1988).
  4. Jovanovich, D., and Dogsa, T. Comparison of software development models. Proceedings of the 7th International Conf, 11-13 June 2003, ConTEL 2003, pp. 587-592.
  5. Tuteja, M., and Dubey, G. 2009. A Research Study on importance of Testing and Quality Assurance in Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Models. Int. J. of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE). (July 2009).
  6. Laura, C., Martinez, R., Mora M, and Alvarez, F.J. 2009. A Descriptive/Comparative Study of the Evolution of Process Models of Software Development Life Cycles. Proceedings of the 2009 Mexican Int. Conf. on Computer Science IEEE Computer Society. Washington, DC, USA. (2009).
  7. Banerjee, C., and Pandey, S.K. 2009 .Software Security Rules: SDLC Perspective. IJCSIS Int. J. of Computer Science and Information Security. Vol. 6, No.1. (2009)
  8. Kumar, D., and Hiranwal, S. 2010. Performance Enhancement of Software Process Models. 2nd Int. Conf. on Software Technology and Engineering (ICSTE). (2010).
  9. Ragunath, P.K. et al. 2010. Evolving A New Model (SDLC Model-2010) For Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). IJCSNS Int. J. of Computer Science and Network Security, Vol .10 No.1. (Jan 2010).
  10. Wakchaure, A.M., and Joshi, S.D. 2011. A Framework to Detect and Analyze Software Vulnerabilities: Analysis Phase in SDLC. Int. J. of Advanced Computer Engineering and Architecture. Vol. 1, No. 1. (June 2011).
  11. Sharma, M. 2011. A Survey of project scenario impact in SDLC models selection process. Int. J. of Scientific & Engineering Research. Vol 2, Issue 7. (July 2011).
  12. Massey, V., and Satao, K.J., 2012. Evolving a New Software Development Life Cycle Model (SDLC) incorporated with Release Management. Int. J. of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT). Vol 1, Issue 4. (April 2012). 2249 – 8958.
  13. Balaji, S., and Murugaiyan, M.S. 2012. Waterfall Vs V-Model Vs Agile: A Comparative Study On SDLC. Int. J. of Information Technology and Business Management. Vol. 2, No. 1. (June 2012).
  14. Sabale, R.G., and Dani, A.R. 2012. Comparative Study of Prototype Model For Software Engineering With System Development Life Cycle. IOSR J. of Engineering (IOSRJEN). Vol 2, Issue 7. (July 2012). 2250-3021. 21-24.
  15. Kumar, N. et al. 2013. Evolving a New Software Development Life Cycle Model SDLC-2013 with Client Satisfaction. Int. J. of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE). Vol.3, Issue.1. (March 2013). 2231-2307.
  16. A. Mishra and Dubey, “A Comparative Study of Different Software Development Life Cycle Models in Different Scenarios”, International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, Volume 1, Issue 5, October 2013
  17. Patel, S. 2014. Security Integration in SDLC Analysis Phase”, IJCSNS Int. J. of Computer Science and Network Security. Vol.14 No.12, (December 2014).
  18. Massey, V., and Satao, K.J., Comparing Various SDLC Models And The New Proposed Model On The Basis Of Available Methodology.
  19. Wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterfall_model
  20. Tutorialspoint.com/sdlc/sdlc_v_model
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

SDLC Waterfall V-model Prototype RAD