CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Comparative Clustering Approach Intended for Evaluating SaaS

by Dhanamma Jagli, Seema Purohit, N. Subhash Chandra
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 169 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2017
Authors: Dhanamma Jagli, Seema Purohit, N. Subhash Chandra
10.5120/ijca2017914679

Dhanamma Jagli, Seema Purohit, N. Subhash Chandra . Comparative Clustering Approach Intended for Evaluating SaaS. International Journal of Computer Applications. 169, 8 ( Jul 2017), 13-16. DOI=10.5120/ijca2017914679

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2017914679,
author = { Dhanamma Jagli, Seema Purohit, N. Subhash Chandra },
title = { Comparative Clustering Approach Intended for Evaluating SaaS },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jul 2017 },
volume = { 169 },
number = { 8 },
month = { Jul },
year = { 2017 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 13-16 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume169/number8/28003-2017914679/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2017914679 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:16:49.970470+05:30
%A Dhanamma Jagli
%A Seema Purohit
%A N. Subhash Chandra
%T Comparative Clustering Approach Intended for Evaluating SaaS
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 169
%N 8
%P 13-16
%D 2017
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The Cloud computing is key computing and playing an important role to share many resources. The Software as a service (SaaS) service model is giving more benefits to the end user. Any user wants to use the software as a service, will not install any software locally rather they can access any application/software as assertive via the internet just by login to the system. For every service user, selecting the suitable one became a difficult task. Hence in this paper providing various data mining clustering algorithms and their comparison based AWS data sets collected. The goal of this research is to provide a decision-making system with optimal solutions to cloud service users and providers to select/provide potential software services and afford according to specified requirements quickly and easily.

References
  1. I. Atom and C. H. Bong, “Measuring Software Quality in Use: State-of- the-Art and Research Challenges,” Sop, vol. 17, no. 2, 2015.
  2. Y. Bard and G. Caplan, “Software-as-a-Service and Version log: Towards Innovative Service Differentiation,” in 2010 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2010, pp. 237–243.
  3. G. Alves, C. Silva, E. Cavalcante, T. Batista, and F. Lopes, “Relative QoS: A New Concept for Cloud Service Quality,” IEEE Serv. oriented, 2015.
  4. N. Baliyan and S. Kumar, “Quality Assessment of Software as a Service on Cloud Using Fuzzy Logic,” in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing in Emerging Markets (CCEM), 2013, pp. 1–6.
  5. A. Banka, A. Sarangi, M. Sain, and H. J. Lee, “Exploration of security parameters to evaluate SaaS,” 2013 4th Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Netw. Technol. ICCCNT 2013, 2013.
  6. A. K. Bardsiri and S. M. Hashemi, “QoS Metrics for Cloud Computing Services Evaluation,” Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl., vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 27–33, 2014.
  7. A. Benlian, M. Koufaris, and T. Hess, “Service Quality in Software-as-a-Service: Developing the SaaS-Qual Measure and Examining Its Role in Usage Continuance,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 85–126, 2012.
  8. N. Boussoualim, “Evaluation and Selection of SaaS Product based on user preferences,” pp. 299–308, 2015.
  9. F. Braithwaite and M. Woodman, “Success Dimensions in Selecting Cloud Software Services,” 2011 37th EUROMICRO Conf. Softw. Eng. Adv. Appl., pp. 146–154, 2011.
  10. L. Burton, “Quality of Service Attributes for Software as a Service,” pp. 38–47, 2013.
  11. G. Chen, X. Bai, X. Huang, M. Li, and L. Zhou, “Evaluating services on the cloud using ontology QoS model,” Proc. 2011 IEEE 6th Int. Symp. Serv. Oriented Syst., no. Some, pp. 312–317, 2011.
  12. S. W. Choi and S. D. Kim, “A quality model for evaluating reusability of services in SOA,” Proc. - 10th IEEE J. Conf. E-Commerce Technol. 5th Enter. Comput. E-Commerce E-Services, CEC 2008 EEE 2008, pp. 293–298, 2008.
  13. Dhanamma Jagli, Seema. Purohit, and N. Subhash Chandra, “SAASQUAL: A Quality Model For Evaluating SaaS on The Cloud Computing Environment”.
  14. Dhanamma. Jagli, Seema. Purohit, and N. S. Chandra, “Evaluating Service Customizability of SaaS on the Cloud Computing Environment,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 141, no. 9, 2016.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

SaaS K-means Clustering Hierarchical Clustering BiCluster Cloud Computing

Powered by PhDFocusTM