CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Providing Multimedia QoS Methods over Software Defined Networks: A Comprehensive Review

by Mohammad Reza Parsaei, Reza Javidan, Ali Fatemifar, Sina Einavipour
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 168 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2017
Authors: Mohammad Reza Parsaei, Reza Javidan, Ali Fatemifar, Sina Einavipour
10.5120/ijca2017914549

Mohammad Reza Parsaei, Reza Javidan, Ali Fatemifar, Sina Einavipour . Providing Multimedia QoS Methods over Software Defined Networks: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Computer Applications. 168, 9 ( Jun 2017), 55-59. DOI=10.5120/ijca2017914549

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2017914549,
author = { Mohammad Reza Parsaei, Reza Javidan, Ali Fatemifar, Sina Einavipour },
title = { Providing Multimedia QoS Methods over Software Defined Networks: A Comprehensive Review },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jun 2017 },
volume = { 168 },
number = { 9 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2017 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 55-59 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume168/number9/27907-2017914549/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2017914549 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:15:44.189620+05:30
%A Mohammad Reza Parsaei
%A Reza Javidan
%A Ali Fatemifar
%A Sina Einavipour
%T Providing Multimedia QoS Methods over Software Defined Networks: A Comprehensive Review
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 168
%N 9
%P 55-59
%D 2017
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In recent years, numerous claims on non-responsiveness of architecture of current networks and Internet to users’ daily demands have been raised. To deal with the problem, new architectures have been suggested. Software-defined network (SDN) introduced a new architecture for computer network in which control level and data transfer level are separated from each other. This architecture has contributed to smartness, flexibility, and controllability of computer networks. Among advantages of this architecture, one could point to easy control and isolation of different streams without being concerned with implementation and test of newly suggested protocols and architectures on real networks. In this paper, introduction of new network architecture is followed by detailing different methods for guaranteeing the quality of service (QoS) in software-defined network and elaborating the challenges ahead. In fact, the objective of present paper is to represent the effect of use of software-defined network on quality of service in different multi-media applications and based on the architecture of the networks in which control layer and directing layer are isolated. Such an architecture enables the use of different routing algorithms for different streams. In the case of these methods, the introduced methods are applied for improving the use of video streams.

References
  1. Rowshanrad, S., Parsaei, M. R. and Keshtgari, M. “IMPLEMENTING NDN USING SDN: A REVIEW ON METHODS AND APPLICATIONS,” IIUM Engineering Journal, vol. 17, no. 2, pp.11-20, 2017.
  2. Parsaei, M. R., Khalilian, S. H. and Javidan, R. “A Comparative Study on Fault Tolerance Methods in IP Networks versus Software Defined Networks,” International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering. vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 146-154, 2016.
  3. Braden, R., Clark, D. and Shenker, S. “Integrated services in the Internet architecture: an overview,” RFC 1633, 1994.
  4. Blake, S., Black, D., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z. and Weiss, W. “An architecture for differentiated services,” RFC 2475, 1998.
  5. Saint-Andre, P. “Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Core,” RFC 3920, 2004.
  6. Vasseur, J. and Roux, J. “Path computation element (PCE) communication protocol (PCEP),” RFC 5440, 2009.
  7. McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G., Peterson, L., Rexford, J., Shenker, S. and Turner, J. “OpenFlow : Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication, vol. 38, pp. 69-74, 2008.
  8. Foster, N., Harrison, R., Freedman, M.J., Monsanto, C., Rexford, J., Story, A. and Walker, D. “Frenetic: a network programming language,” in Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming (ICFP), pp. 279-291, 2011.
  9. Voellmy, A. and Hudak, P. “Nettle: taking the sting out of programming ‎network‎ routers,” ‎in Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Practical aspects of declarative languages (PADL), pp. 235-249, 2011.
  10. Alliance, O. “Osgi service platform, core specification, release 4, version 4.1,” OSGi Specification, 2007.
  11. Seedorf, J. and Burger, E. “Application-layer traffic optimization (ALTO) problem statement,” RFC 5693, 2009.
  12. Civanlar, S., Parlakisik, M., Tekalp, A.M., Gorkemli, B., Kaytaz, B. and Onem, E. “A QoS-enabled OpenFlow Environment for Scalable Video Streaming,” in Proc of IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops, pp. 351-356, 2010.
  13. Egilmez, H.E., Gorkemli, B., Tekalp, A.M. and Civanlar, S. “Scalable video streaming over OpenFlow networks: An optimization framework for QoS routing,” in 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 2241 - 2244, 2011.
  14. Laga, S., Van Cleemput, T., Van Raemdonck, F., Vanhoutte, F., Bouten, N., Claeys, M. and De Turck, F. “Optimizing scalable video deliv ery through OpenFlow layerbased routing,” in Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS), IEEE, pp. 1-4, 2014.
  15. Karl, M., Gruen, J. and Herfet, T. “Multimedia optimized routing in OpenFlow networks,” in 19th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON), pp. 1-6, 2013.
  16. Kim, W., Sharma, P., Lee, J., Banerjee, S., Tourrilhes, J., Lee, S.J. and Yalagandula, P. “Automated and scalable qos control for network convergence,” Proc. INM/WREN, vol. 10, pp. 1-6, 2010.
  17. Owens, I. and Durresi, A. “Video over Software -Defined Networking (VSDN),” in 2013 16th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS), pp. 44-51, 2013.
  18. Georgopoulos, P., Elkhatib, Y., Broadbent, M., Mu, M. and Race, N. “Towards network-wide QoE fairness using openflow-assisted adaptive video streaming,” in Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Future human-centric multimedia networking, pp. 15-20, 2013.
  19. Jivorasetkul, S., Shimamura, M. and Iida, K. “End -to-End Header Compression over Software-Defined Networks: A Low Latency Network Architecture,” in 2012 4th International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS), pp. 493-494, 2012.
  20. Kassler, A., Skorin-Kapov, L., Dobrijevic, O., Matijasevic, M. and Dely, P. “Towards QoE-driven multimedia service negotiation and path optimization with software defined networking,” 20th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), pp. 1-5, 2012.
  21. Nabaei, A., Hamian, M., Parsaei, M. R., Safdari, R., Samad-Soltani, T., Zarrabi, H. and Ghassemi, A. “Topologies and performance of intelligent algorithms: a comprehensive review,” Artificial Intelligence Review, pp. 1-25, 2016. doi:10.1007/s10462-016-9517-3.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Quality of Service Multimedia Future Internet Architecture Software Defined Networks.

Powered by PhDFocusTM