The week's pick
Random Articles
Reseach Article
A Brief Review on Blind Image Quality Evaluation Methods
| International Journal of Computer Applications |
| Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA |
| Volume 163 - Number 6 |
| Year of Publication: 2017 |
| Authors: Sushilkumar N. Holambe, Ulhas B. Shinde, Priyanka M. Kshirsagar |
10.5120/ijca2017913550
|
Sushilkumar N. Holambe, Ulhas B. Shinde, Priyanka M. Kshirsagar . A Brief Review on Blind Image Quality Evaluation Methods. International Journal of Computer Applications. 163, 6 ( Apr 2017), 24-28. DOI=10.5120/ijca2017913550
Abstract
Image Quality Assessment plays an important role in various image processing applications. It is still an active area of research. A great deal of effort has been made in recent years to develop objective image quality metrics that correlate well with perceived human quality measurement or subjective methods. Image quality assessment means estimating the quality of an image and it is used for many image processing applications. Image quality can be measured in two ways, subjective and objective method. In Subjective image quality assessment the evaluation of quality by humans is obtained by mean opinion score (MOS) method where in objective evaluation of quality is done by algorithms. It concerned with how image is perceived by a viewer and gives his or her opinion on a particular image and judge quality of the multimedia content. The human eyes extract structural information from the viewing field, so the human visual system is highly adapted for this purpose.
References
- A. Mittal, A. K. Moorthy, and A. C. Bovik, “No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. (to appear), 2012.
- A. K. Moorthy and A. C. Bovik, “Blind image quality assessment: From natural scene statistics to perceptual quality,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 3350–3364, 2011.
- M. Saad, A. C. Bovik, and C. Charrier, “Blind image quality assessment: A natural scene statistics approach in the DCT domain,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 3339–3352, 2012.
- Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, Apr. 2004.
- S. Daly, “The visible difference predictor: An algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity,” in Digital images and human vision (A. B. Watson, ed.), pp. 179–206, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1993.
- J. Lubin, “The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance,” in Digital images and human vision (A. B. Watson, ed.), pp. 163–178, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1993.
- W. Xu and G. Hauske, “Picture quality evaluation based on error segmentation,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 2308, pp. 1454–1465, 1994.
- W. Osberger, N. Bergmann, and A. Maeder, “An automatic image quality assessment technique incorporating high level perceptual factors,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Proc., pp. 414– 418, 1998.
- A. Mittal, R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik, “ Making a Completely Blind Image QualityAnalyzer ”, IEEE Signal processing Letters, pp. 209-212, vol. 22, no. 3, March 2013.
Index Terms
Keywords