CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

TOPSIS for Multi Criteria Decision Making in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment

by Surendra Singh Gautam, Abhishekh, S. R. Singh
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 156 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Surendra Singh Gautam, Abhishekh, S. R. Singh
10.5120/ijca2016912514

Surendra Singh Gautam, Abhishekh, S. R. Singh . TOPSIS for Multi Criteria Decision Making in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment. International Journal of Computer Applications. 156, 8 ( Dec 2016), 42-49. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016912514

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016912514,
author = { Surendra Singh Gautam, Abhishekh, S. R. Singh },
title = { TOPSIS for Multi Criteria Decision Making in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Dec 2016 },
volume = { 156 },
number = { 8 },
month = { Dec },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 42-49 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume156/number8/26733-2016912514/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016912514 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:02:06.096500+05:30
%A Surendra Singh Gautam
%A Abhishekh
%A S. R. Singh
%T TOPSIS for Multi Criteria Decision Making in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 156
%N 8
%P 42-49
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper is based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, we introduce an extension of fuzzy TOPSIS for multi criteria decision making problem in intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets are more suitable to deal with uncertainty than other generalized forms of fuzzy sets. The rating of each alternative and the weight of each criterion are expressed in intuitionistic fuzzy number. The normalized intuitionistic fuzzy number is calculated by using the concept of

References
  1. Abo-Sinna, M. A. and Amer, A. H. 2005. Extensions of TOPSIS for multi-objective large-scale nonlinear programming problems, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 162(1), 243–256.
  2. Atanassov, K. T. 1986. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87–96.
  3. Atanassov, K. T. and Gargov, G. 1989. Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy sets and systems, 31, 343-349.
  4. Boran, F. E., Genc, S., Kurt, M., and Akay, D. 2009. A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 36:11363–11368.
  5. Byun, H. S. and Lee, K. H. 2005. A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26 (11-12), 1338–1347.
  6. Chai, J., Liu, J. N. K. and Xu, Z. 2013. A rule-based group decision model for warehouse evaluation under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments, Expert Systems with Applications, 40(6), 1959–70.
  7. Chen, T. C. 2000. Extensions of the topsis for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1-9.
  8. Chen, M. F. and Tzeng, G. H. 2004. Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40(13), 1473–1490.
  9. Chu, T. C. 2002. Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 20(11), 859–864.
  10. Hwang, C. L., Lai, Y. J. and Liu, T. Y. 1993. A new approach for multiple objective decision making, Computers and Operational Research, 20,889-899.
  11. Hwang, C. L. & Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
  12. Izadikhan, M. 2011. Group decision making process for supplier selection with TOPSIS method under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, Hindawi Publishing corporation advances in fuzzy systems.
  13. Izadikhah, M. 2009. Using the Hamming distance to extend TOPSIS in a fuzzy environment, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 231(1), 200–207.
  14. Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H. and Izadikhah, M. 2006. Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision- making problems with fuzzy data, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 181(2), 1544–1551.
  15. Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H. and Izadikhah, M. 2006. An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 175(2),1375–1384.
  16. Mahdavi, I., Mahdavi-Amiri, N.,Heidarzade, A. and Nourifar, R. 2008. Designing a model of fuzzy TOPSIS in multiple criteria decision making, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 206, 607-617.
  17. Roseline, S. S. and Amirtharaj, E. C. H. 2013. A New method for ranking of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, Indian journal of applied research, vol (3).
  18. Tsaur, S. H., Chang, T. Y. and Yen, C. H. 2002. The evaluation of air- line service quality by fuzzy MCDM, Tourism Management, 23,107–115.
  19. Xu, Z., Zhang, X. 2013. Hesitant fuzzy multi- attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information, Knowl- Based Syst,52:53–64.
  20. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8(3) 338–353.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Intuitionistic fuzzy number ranking of intuitionistic fuzzy number positive ideal solution negative ideal solution multicriteria decision making