CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Significant Big Data Interpretation using Map Reduce Paradigm

by Lavanya Kakkirala, K .Venkateswara Rao
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 156 - Number 1
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Lavanya Kakkirala, K .Venkateswara Rao
10.5120/ijca2016912339

Lavanya Kakkirala, K .Venkateswara Rao . Significant Big Data Interpretation using Map Reduce Paradigm. International Journal of Computer Applications. 156, 1 ( Dec 2016), 7-11. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016912339

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016912339,
author = { Lavanya Kakkirala, K .Venkateswara Rao },
title = { Significant Big Data Interpretation using Map Reduce Paradigm },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Dec 2016 },
volume = { 156 },
number = { 1 },
month = { Dec },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 7-11 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume156/number1/26671-2016912339/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016912339 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:01:23.803285+05:30
%A Lavanya Kakkirala
%A K .Venkateswara Rao
%T Significant Big Data Interpretation using Map Reduce Paradigm
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 156
%N 1
%P 7-11
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The development of ontologies involves continuous but relatively small modifications. Even after a number of changes, ontology and its previous versions usually share most of their axioms. For large and complex ontologies this may require a few minutes, or even a few hours. Cognitive on a Web scale becomes increasingly stimulating because of the large volume of data involved and the complexity of the task. Full re-reasoning over the entire dataset at every update is too time-consuming to be practical. Semantic information has been reduced by using Hadoop framework with simple machine learning algorithm. Each level of mapping and reducing is based on k-means clustering technique. Large set of information can be constructing or modified with the help of simple pattern based grouping. Dynamically grouping dependencies can be made based on attributes. Clustered values have got modifications like addition. At the end user query has been retrieved with the help of grouped items. The system has been assessed on the BTC benchmark and the results show that this method outperforms related ones in nearly all aspects.

References
  1. J. Urbani, S. Kotoulas, E. Oren, and F. Harmelen, “Scalable distributed reasoning using MapReduce,” in Proc. 8th Int. Semantic Web Conf., Chantilly, VA, USA, Oct. 2009, pp. 634–649.
  2. J. Dean and S. Ghemawat, “MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters,” Commun. ACM, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 107–113, 2008.
  3. C.Anagnostopoulos and S.Hadjiefthymiades, “Advanced inference in situation-aware computing,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1108–1115, Sep. 2009.
  4. H. Paulheim and C. Bizer, “Type inference on noisy RDF data,” in Proc. ISWC, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2013, pp. 510–525.
  5. G. Antoniou and A. Bikakis, “DR-Prolog: A system for defeasible reasoning with rules and ontologies on the Semantic Web,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 233–245, Feb. 2007.
  6. V. Milea, F. Frasincar, and U. Kaymak, “tOWL: A temporal web ontol-ogy language,”IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. B, Cybern. vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 268–281, Feb. 2012.
  7. D. Lopez, J. M. Sempere, and P. García, “Inference of reversible tree languages,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. B, Cybern., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1658–1665, Aug. 2004.
  8. A. Schlicht and H. Stuckenschmidt, “MapResolve,” in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. RR, Galway, Ireland, Aug. 2011, pp. 294–299.
  9. B. C. Grau, C. Halaschek-Wiener, and Y. Kazakov, “History matters: Incremental ontology reasoning using modules,” in Proc. ISWC/ASWC, Busan, Korea, 2007, pp. 183–196.
  10. RDF Semantics [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/ RDF Schema[Online]. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDFS
  11. SPARQL 1.1 Overview[Online]. Available:http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-overview/
  12. Hadoop [Online]. Available: http://hadoop.apache.org/
  13. HBase [Online]. Available: http://hbase.apache.org/
  14. Billion Triples Challenge 2012 Dataset [Online]. Available: http://km.aifb.kit.edu/projects/btc-2012/
  15. Y. Guo, Z. Pan, and J. Heflin, “LUBM: A benchmark for OWL knowl-edge base systems,”J. Web Semantics, vol. 3, nos. 2–3, pp. 158–182, Oct. 2005.
  16. Bio2RDF [Online]. Available: http://bio2rdf.org
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Ontology Hadoop Semantic Cognitive Pattern machine learning.

Powered by PhDFocusTM