CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Identification of Precise Object among Various Objects using Sparse Coding

by Giby Jose, P. Manimegalai
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 154 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Giby Jose, P. Manimegalai
10.5120/ijca2016912239

Giby Jose, P. Manimegalai . Identification of Precise Object among Various Objects using Sparse Coding. International Journal of Computer Applications. 154, 10 ( Nov 2016), 24-28. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016912239

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016912239,
author = { Giby Jose, P. Manimegalai },
title = { Identification of Precise Object among Various Objects using Sparse Coding },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Nov 2016 },
volume = { 154 },
number = { 10 },
month = { Nov },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 24-28 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume154/number10/26528-2016912239/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016912239 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:59:54.549664+05:30
%A Giby Jose
%A P. Manimegalai
%T Identification of Precise Object among Various Objects using Sparse Coding
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 154
%N 10
%P 24-28
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In order to identify the exact coconut object form the image, the following methodology is proposed. The input image is preprocessed. Its quality is enhanced using histogram equalization to produce a better result for region-based feature extraction. The edges are then detected in the image segmentation process, as this information is most essential for the classifier algorithm. After detecting the edges the CHT algorithm is applied to identify the coconut. The performance measures viz. Recognition rate, Precision, Recall and simulation time are computed. To enhance the performance, the proposed algorithm is applied and the performance parameters are tabulated. A comparative study is made between the CHT and proposed algorithm to validate the superiority of the proposed algorithm. Sparse Representation-Based Classification (SRC) is face recognition innovation in current years, which has effectively addressed the recognition problem. It recognizes an object based on the training images made available in the gallery. In this paper, SRC has been intended for coconut object identification.

References
  1. Giby Jose and P. Manimegalai, “Identification of Precise Object Among Various Objects Using Sparse Coding - A Review”, Pak. J. Biotechnol. Vol. 13 (special issue on Innovations in information Embedded and communication Systems) Pp. 519- 522 (2016)
  2. Shiqing Zhang, Xiaoming Zhao and Bicheng Lei, “Robust Facial Expression Recognition via Compressive Sensing”, Sensors, Vol. 12, pp. 3747-3761, 2012
  3. Lei Zhanga, Meng Yanga, and Xiangchu Fengb, “Sparse Representation or Collaborative Representation: Which Helps Face Recognition?”,IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1-8, 2011.
  4. Yi Chen, Thong T. Do, and Trac D. Tran, “Robust Face Recognition using Locally Adaptive Sparse Representation”, In Proceedings of IEEE 17th International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 1657-1660, 2010.
  5. Minakshi S. Nagmote and Dr.Milind M. Mushrif, “Review: Sparse Representation for Face Recognition Application”, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), Vol. 4, pp. 1772-1775, 2013.
  6. Rania S alah El-Sayed, Prof. Dr. Mohamed Youssri El-Nahas and Prof. Dr. Ahmed El Kholy, “Sparse Representation Approach for Variation-RobustFace Recognition Using Discrete Wavelet Transform”, IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 275-280, 2012.
  7. Hanxi Li, Peng Wang andChunhua Shen, “A Robust Face Recognition System via Accurate Face Alignment and SparseRepresentation”, In proceedings of International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications, pp. 262 – 269, 2010.
  8. Mohamed Rizon, HanizaYazid, Puteh Saad, Ali Yeon MdShakaff, Abdul Rahman Saad, Masanori Sugisaka, Sazali Yaacob, M.RozailanMamat and M.Karthigayan, “Object Detection using Circular Hough Transform”, American Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 12, pp. 1606-1609, 2005.
  9. Gaurav Aggarwal, Soma Biswas, Patrick J. Flynn and Kevin W. Bowyer, “A Sparse Representation Approach to Face Matching across Plastic Surgery”, In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, pp. 1-7, 2012.
  10. Deng Nan, Zhengguang Xu and ShengQinBian, “Face Recognition Based on Multi-classifierWeighted Optimization and Sparse Representation”, International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Vol.6, No.5, pp.423-436, 2013.
  11. Chenyang Zhang and Yingli Tian, “Subject Adaptive Affection Recognition via Sparse Reconstruction”, In proceedings of CVPR workshop, pp. 351-358, 2014.
  12. Weihong Deng, Jiani Hu, and Jun Guo, “Extended SRC:Undersampled Face Recognitionvia Intraclass Variant Dictionary”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 34, No. 9, pp. 1864-1870, 2012.
  13. John Wright, Allen Y. Yang, Arvind Ganesh, S. Shankar SastryandYi Ma, “ Robust Face Recognition via SparseRepresentation”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 1-18, 2009.
  14. Jian Lai and Xudong Jiang, “Modular Weighted Global Sparse Representationfor Robust Face Recognition”, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 19, No. 9, pp. 571-574, 2012.
  15. Yongkang Wong, Mehrtash T. Harandi and Conrad Sanderson, “On robust face recognition via sparse coding: thegood, the bad and the ugly”, IET Biometrics, pp. 1–14, 2013.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Coconut Identification Sparse Representation-Based Classification (SRC) Recognition Rate.