CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Metacognitive Mathematics Tutor: Mathematics Tutoring System with Metacognitive Strategies

by Asad Raza, Hameedullah Kazi, Muhammad Ali Nizamani
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 153 - Number 4
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Asad Raza, Hameedullah Kazi, Muhammad Ali Nizamani
10.5120/ijca2016912000

Asad Raza, Hameedullah Kazi, Muhammad Ali Nizamani . Metacognitive Mathematics Tutor: Mathematics Tutoring System with Metacognitive Strategies. International Journal of Computer Applications. 153, 4 ( Nov 2016), 21-31. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016912000

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016912000,
author = { Asad Raza, Hameedullah Kazi, Muhammad Ali Nizamani },
title = { Metacognitive Mathematics Tutor: Mathematics Tutoring System with Metacognitive Strategies },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Nov 2016 },
volume = { 153 },
number = { 4 },
month = { Nov },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 21-31 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume153/number4/26391-2016912000/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016912000 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:58:14.597389+05:30
%A Asad Raza
%A Hameedullah Kazi
%A Muhammad Ali Nizamani
%T Metacognitive Mathematics Tutor: Mathematics Tutoring System with Metacognitive Strategies
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 153
%N 4
%P 21-31
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The key aim of this research was to investigate the metacognitive mathematics tutor impact on students learning and metacognition. Student needs special learning strategies to experience better learning in mathematics. Metacognitive Mathematics tutor is an intelligent tutoring system which supports three metacognitive learning strategies self explanation, self questioning and self monitoring. Metacognition is higher order thinking. Metacognitive strategies are learning strategies which supports student learning. Students can improve their learning through metacognition skills. Total 70 students were involved in evaluation of Metacognitive mathematics tutor, 35 were sixth and 35 were seventh grade students. Pretest and Posttest experimental design was used for evaluation. Students used mathematics practice sheet in pretest then in posttest they had used Metacognitive mathematics tutor. A quiz was conducted to measure learning while Jr. MAI version B was also given to assess metacognitive skills. Results show that students learning have increased and also their metacognition after using the metacognitive mathematics tutor. Statistically significant difference in results between pretest and posttest (Man-Whitney, p<0.05) have been observed.

References
  1. D’ambrosio, B., Johnson, H., &amp; Hobbs, L. (1995). Strategies for increasing achievement in mathematics. Educating everybody’s children: Diverse teaching strategies for diverse learners: What research and practice say about improving achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  2. Garofalo, J., &amp; Lester Jr, F. K. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for research in mathematics education, 163-176.
  3. SAHIN, S. M., &amp; Kendir, F. (2013). The effect of using metacognitive strategies for solving geometry problems on students' achievement and attitude. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(19), 1777.
  4. Van der Stel, M., Veenman, M. V., Deelen, K., &amp; Haenen, J. (2010). The increasing role of metacognitive skills in math: a cross-sectional study from a developmental perspective. ZDM, 42(2), 219-229.
  5. Hollingworth, R. W., &amp; McLoughlin, C. (2001). Developing Science Students' Metacognitive Problem Solving Skills Online. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 50-63.
  6. Kwon, K., Kumalasari, C. D., &amp; Howland, J. L. (2011). Self-explanation prompts on problem-solving performance in an interactive learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(2), 96-112.
  7. Najar, A. S., &amp; Mitrovic, A. (2013). Examples and tutored problems: How can self-explanation make a difference to learning?. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 339-348). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  8. Leelawong, K., &amp; Biswas, G. (2008). Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty's Brain system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18(3), 181-208.
  9. Freedman, R., Ali, S. S., &amp; McRoy, S. (2000). Links: what is an intelligent tutoring system?. intelligence, 11(3), 15-16.
  10. Sleeman, D., &amp; Brown, J. S. (1982). Intelligent tutoring systems.
  11. Conati, C. (2009). Intelligent Tutoring Systems: New Challenges and directions. In IJCAI (Vol. 9, pp. 2-7).
  12. Steenbergen-Hu, S., &amp; Cooper, H. (2014). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on college students’ academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 331-347.
  13. Vanlehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J. A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., &amp; Wintersgill, M. (2005). The Andes physics tutoring system: Lessons learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(3), 147-204.
  14. Weragama, D., &amp; Reye, J. (2013, July). The PHP intelligent tutoring system. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 583-586). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  15. Butz, C. J., Hua, S., &amp; Maguire, R. B. (2006). A web-based bayesian intelligent tutoring system for computer programming. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems: An International Journal, 4(1), 77-97.
  16. Melis, E., &amp; Siekmann, J. (2004). Activemath: An intelligent tutoring system for mathematics. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (pp. 91-101). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  17. Arroyo, I., Beal, C., Murray, T., Walles, R., &amp; Woolf, B. P. (2004). Web-based intelligent multimedia tutoring for high stakes achievement tests. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 468-477). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  18. Sklavakis, D., &amp; Refanidis, I. (2013). MATHESIS: An Intelligent Web-Based Algebra Tutoring School. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 22(4), 191-218.
  19. Cognition (2016). Wikipedia. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognition
  20. Neisser, U. (2014). Cognitive psychology: Classic edition. Psychology Press
  21. Metacognition (2016). Wikipedia. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacognition
  22. Flavell JH.(1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906.
  23. Metcalfe, J. E., &amp; Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. The MIT Press.
  24. Chi, M. T., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., &amp; LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive science, 18(3), 439-477.
  25. Chi, M. T. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. Advances in instructional psychology, 5, 161-238.
  26. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.
  27. Cheshire, A., Ball, L. J., &amp; Lewis, C. N. (2005). Self-explanation, feedback and the development of analogical reasoning skills: Microgenetic evidence for a metacognitive processing account. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. BG Bara, L. Barsalou &amp; M. Bucciarelli (pp. 435-41).
  28. Wylie, R., Koedinger, K. R., &amp; Mitamura, T. (2009). Is self-explanation always better? The effects of adding self-explanation prompts to an English grammar tutor. In Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1300-1305).
  29. Aleven, V., Ogan, A., Popescu, O., Torrey, C., &amp; Koedinger, K. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of a tutorial dialogue system for self-explanation. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 443-454). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  30. Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., &amp; Rummel, N. (2009). Intelligent Tutoring Systems with Multiple Representations and Self-Explanation Prompts Support Learning of Fractions. In AIED (pp. 441-448).
  31. Wong, B. Y. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 227-268.
  32. Draaijer, S., &amp; Boter, J.(2005). Questionbank: Computer Supported Self-Questioning. In Proceedings Of The 9th computer assisted assessment (Caa) Conference, Loughborough University, Loughborough.
  33. Mostow, J., &amp; Chen, W. (2009, July). Generating Instruction Automatically for the Reading Strategy of Self-Questioning. In AIED (pp. 465-472).
  34. Pate, M. L., &amp; Miller, G. (2011). Effects of Regulatory Self-Questioning on Secondary-Level Students' Problem-Solving Performance. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(1), 72-84.
  35. Anastasia Kitsantas, Nada Dabbagh.( 2009). Self-monitoring and Self-evaluation. In Learning To Learn With Integrated Learning Technologies (Ilt): A Practical Guide For Academic Success.(pp. 93-94).
  36. Schunk, D. H., &amp; Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. Guilford Press.
  37. May, M., George, S., &amp; Prévôt, P. (2011). TrAVis to enhance students’ self-monitoring in online learning supported by computer-mediated communication tools. Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 3, 623-634.
  38. Chang, M. (2010). Effects of self-monitoring on web-based language learner’s performance and motivation. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 298-310.
  39. Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., &amp; Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children's knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary educational psychology, 27(1), 51-79.
  40. Sarac, S., &amp; Karakelle, S. (2012). On-line and Off-line Assessment of Metacognition. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(2), 301.
  41. Schwartz, N. H., Andersen, C., Hong, N., Howard, B., &amp; McGee, S. (2004). The influence of metacognitive skills on learners' memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1), 77-93.
  42. Topçu, M. S., &amp; Yılmaz-Tüzün, Ö. (2009). Elementary students' metacognition and epistemological beliefs considering science achievement, gender and socioeconomic status. İlköğretim Online, 8(3).
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Intelligent tutoring system Metacognition Learning Self explanation Self questioning Self monitoring

Powered by PhDFocusTM