We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Simulation of the Monty Hall Problem

by Mazen Alrahili
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 152 - Number 6
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Mazen Alrahili
10.5120/ijca2016911878

Mazen Alrahili . Simulation of the Monty Hall Problem. International Journal of Computer Applications. 152, 6 ( Oct 2016), 16-19. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016911878

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016911878,
author = { Mazen Alrahili },
title = { Simulation of the Monty Hall Problem },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Oct 2016 },
volume = { 152 },
number = { 6 },
month = { Oct },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 16-19 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume152/number6/26323-2016911878/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016911878 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:57:27.128769+05:30
%A Mazen Alrahili
%T Simulation of the Monty Hall Problem
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 152
%N 6
%P 16-19
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The Monty Hall problem is a conditional probablity example in which one of three doors has a valuable prize and other two doors conceive worthless “goats.” The game features are a rational decision between stay or switch given the constraints of the game. This paper presents simulation results for the original Monty Hall and a variant of two-player Monty Hall problem. The simulation results, based on the analysis of successful frequencies of either option, are useful in clarifying the counter-intuitive nature of the problem.

References
  1. Bowman, M., Debray, S. K., and Peterson, L. L. 1993. Reasoning about naming systems.
  2. Ding, W., and Marchionini, G. 1997 A Study on Video Browsing Strategies. Technical Report. The university of Maryland at College Park.
  3. Fröhlich, B., and Plate, J. 2000. The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  4. Tavel, P. 2007 Modeling, and Simulation Design. AK Peters Ltd.
  5. Sannella, M. J. 1994 Constraint Satisfaction and Debugging for Interactive User Interfaces. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order Number: UMI Order No. GAX95-09398., The university of Washington.
  6. Forman, G. 2003. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Mar. 2003), 1289-1305.
  7. Brown, L. D., Hua, H., and Gao, C. 2003. A widget framework for augmented interaction in SCAPE.
  8. Y.T. Yu, M.F. Lau, "A comparison of MC/DC, MUMCUT and several other coverage criteria for logical decisions," Journal of Systems and Software, 2005, in press.
  9. Spector, A. Z. 1989. Achieving application requirements. In Distributed Systems, S. Mullender.
  10. Rosenhouse, J. (2009) The Monty Hall Problem. Oxford University Press, New York.
  11. Wang, J. L., Tran, T. and Abebe, F. (2016) Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Inference for the Monty Hall Problem.Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 4, 1222-1230. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2016.47127.
  12. Wang, J. L., Tran, T., Abebe, F. and Wang, X.-Q. (2016) Rational Decisions in Bayesian Games, Proceedings of Dynamic Systems and Applications, 7, 339-341.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Monty Hall problem Simulation Conditional Probability.