CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Comparison of Predictive Capability of Software Reliability Growth Models with Exponentiated Weibull Distribution

by N. Ahmad, S. M. K Quadri, Razeef Mohd
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 15 - Number 6
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: N. Ahmad, S. M. K Quadri, Razeef Mohd
10.5120/1949-2607

N. Ahmad, S. M. K Quadri, Razeef Mohd . Comparison of Predictive Capability of Software Reliability Growth Models with Exponentiated Weibull Distribution. International Journal of Computer Applications. 15, 6 ( February 2011), 40-43. DOI=10.5120/1949-2607

@article{ 10.5120/1949-2607,
author = { N. Ahmad, S. M. K Quadri, Razeef Mohd },
title = { Comparison of Predictive Capability of Software Reliability Growth Models with Exponentiated Weibull Distribution },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2011 },
volume = { 15 },
number = { 6 },
month = { February },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 40-43 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume15/number6/1949-2607/ },
doi = { 10.5120/1949-2607 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:03:29.447107+05:30
%A N. Ahmad
%A S. M. K Quadri
%A Razeef Mohd
%T Comparison of Predictive Capability of Software Reliability Growth Models with Exponentiated Weibull Distribution
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 15
%N 6
%P 40-43
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This study aims to compare the predictive capability of two popular software reliability growth models (SRGM), say exponential growth and inflection S-shaped growth models. We first review the exponentiated Weibull (EW) testing-effort functions and discuss exponential type and inflection S-shaped type SRGM with EW testing-effort. We then analyzed the actual data applications and compare the predictive capability of these two SRGM graphically. The findings reveal that inflection S-shaped type SRGM has better prediction capability as compare to exponential type SRGM.

References
  1. Ahmad, N., Bokhari, M.U., Quadri, S.M.K. and Khan, M.G.M.(2008), “The Exponentiated Weibull software reliability growthmodel with various testing-efforts and optimal release policy: a performance analysis”, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 25 (2), pp. 211-235.
  2. Ahmad, N., Khan, M. G. M and Rafi, L. S. (2010), “A Study of Testing-Effort Dependent Inflection S-Shaped Software Reliability Growth Models with Imperfect Debugging”, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 27 (1), pp. 89 –110.
  3. Bokhari, M.U. and Ahmad, N. (2006), “Analysis of a software reliability growth models: the case of log-logistic test-effor function”, In: Proceedings of the 17th IASTED International Conference on Modeling and Simulation (MS’2006), Montreal, Canada, pp. 540-545.
  4. Bokhari, M.U. and Ahmad, N. (2007), “Software reliability growth modeling for Exponentiated Weibull functions with actual software failures data”, Advances in Computer Science and Engineering: Reports and Monographs, Vol. 2, pp. 390-396,World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore.
  5. Goel, A.L. and Okumoto, K. (1979), “Time dependent error detection rate model for software reliability and other performance measures”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. R- 28, No. 3, pp.206-211.
  6. Huang, C.Y., Kuo, S.Y. and Lyu, M.R. (2007), “An assessmentOf testing-effort dependent software reliability growth models”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 56, no.2, pp. 198-211.
  7. Kuo, S.Y., Hung, C.Y. and Lyu, M.R. (2001), “Framework for modeling software reliability, using various testing-efforts and fault detection rates”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 50, no.3, pp 310-320.
  8. Lyu, M.R. (1996), Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering, McGraw- Hill.
  9. Musa J.D. (1999), Software Reliability Engineering: More Reliable Software, Faster Development and Testing, McGraw Hill.
  10. Musa, J.D., Iannino, A. and Okumoto, K. (1987), Software Reliability: Measurement, Prediction and Application, McGraw Hill.
  11. Ohba, M. (1984), “Software reliability analysis models” IBM Journal. Research Development, Vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 428-443.
  12. Ohba, M. (1984a), “Inflection S-shaped software reliability growth models”, Stochastic Models in Reliability Theory (Osaki,S.and Hatoyama, Y. Editors), pp. 144-162, Springer Verlag Merlin.
  13. Pham, H. (2000), Software Reliability, Springer-Verlag, New York.
  14. Quadri, S.M.K., Ahmad, N., Peer, M.A. and Kumar, M. (2006), “Nonhomogeneous Poisson process software reliability growth model with generalized exponential testing effort function”, RAU Journal of Research, Vol., 16 (1-2), pp. 159-163.
  15. Xie, M. (1991), Software Reliability Modeling, World Scientific Publication, Singapore.
  16. Yamada, S., Hishitani J. and Osaki, S. (1993), “Software reliability growth model with Weibull testing-effort: a model and application”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. R-42, pp.100 105.
  17. Yamada, S., Ohba, M. and Osaki, S. (1984), “S-shaped Software reliability growth models and their applications”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. R-33, pp. 289-292.
  18. Yamada, S. and Ohtera, H. (1990), “Software reliability Growth models for testing effort control”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 46, 3, pp. 343-349.
  19. Yamada, S., Ohtera, H. and Norihisa, H. (1986), “Software reliability growth model with testing-effort”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. R-35, no. 1, pp.19-23.
  20. Yamada, S., and Osaki, S. (1985), “Software reliability Growth modeling: models and applications”, IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, Vol. SE-11, no. 12, pp. 1431-1437.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Testing-Effort Function Exponentiated Weibull Distribution Software Reliability Growth Models Mean value function non-homogeneous Poisson process Estimation methods