We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Learning Engagement in Virtual Environment

by Subhenur Latif
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 148 - Number 11
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Subhenur Latif
10.5120/ijca2016911289

Subhenur Latif . Learning Engagement in Virtual Environment. International Journal of Computer Applications. 148, 11 ( Aug 2016), 7-13. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016911289

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016911289,
author = { Subhenur Latif },
title = { Learning Engagement in Virtual Environment },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Aug 2016 },
volume = { 148 },
number = { 11 },
month = { Aug },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 7-13 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume148/number11/25799-2016911289/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016911289 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:53:03.975280+05:30
%A Subhenur Latif
%T Learning Engagement in Virtual Environment
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 148
%N 11
%P 7-13
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Today e-learning is blooming as a vital part of digital age education which facilitates a virtual environment for enhanced interaction & engagement between teachers and fellow learners and to engage them with resources for effective learning. Despite having significant potential, the Google classroom is still vastly underutilized especially in developing countries e.g. Bangladesh. This study is an endeavor to identify the factors responsible for poor engagement of students in Google classroom and to explore other critical barriers behind the underutilization of this virtual learning platform. From the empirical findings, this study attempts to explain and testify the effectiveness of strategies adopted in different classes for more engagement and proactive participation from the students. The primary data was acquired through a baseline survey which was carried out using a pre-defined structured questionnaire with a sample size of 350 randomly selected undergraduate students from different levels. Several case studies were also carried out along with participatory and non-participatory observations of student activities as methodology of this research. The research questions were: a) Do the peer influence improves student engagement in critical thinking? b) Do the passive role of teacher increase the active participation of students? c) Do the students prefer Facebook groups as a platform for group study instead of Google classroom? The findings of this study, empirically unearths peer influence as a significant determinant of the effectiveness of Google classroom. Furthermore, the majority of learners are found more comfortable while teachers play passive facilitators’ role instead of active intervention whereas the availability of Facebook groups as a popular alternate platform for interaction may limit the utilization of Google classroom. Finally the data analysis reveals that the strategic changes in selected dependent variables facilitate more proactive engagement by the learners which in turn enhance the effectiveness through optimum utilization of the opportunities of Google classroom as a virtual platform for more effective learning.

References
  1. Bosch, Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town, South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, Volume 35, Issue 2, 2009
  2. Chou and Pi, The Effectiveness of Facebook Groups for e-Learning, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 5, No. 7, July 2015
  3. Heu, Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook, Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 27, Issue 2, March 2011, Pages 662–676
  4. Cheung, Chiu, Lee, Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 27, Issue 4, July 2011, Pages 1337–1343
  5. Yu, Tian, Vogel, Kwok, Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts, Volume 55, Issue 4, December 2010, Pages 1494–1503
  6. Albyrak, Yildirim, Using Social Networking Sites for Teaching and Learning Students' Involvement in and Acceptance of Facebook as a Course Management System, Journal of Educational Computing Research, April 2015 52: 155-179, first published on March 26, 2015
  7. Chehayeb, A. (2015). New in Classroom: saving time while grading. Retrieved from Googleforeducation.blogspot.com/2015/12/new-in-Classroom-saving-tim
  8. Martin, F and Parker, M. A., Use of Synchronous Virtual Classrooms: Why, Who,and How? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching Vol. 10, No. 2, June 2014 p 192-210
  9. Keeler, A. "15 More things you can do with Google Classroom". Retrieved from http://www.alicekeeler.com/teachertech/2014/09/22/15-more-things-you-can-do-with-Google-classroom/
  10. Janzen, M. (2014) “Hot Team : Google Classroom”. Retrieved from tlt.psu.edu/2014/12/04/hot-team-Google- classroom
  11. Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S.G. (2005). Research Methods in Education: An Introduction. Boston: Pearson.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Virtual classroom Facebook group Learning Engagement peer influence critical thinking ownership