CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Evaluate The Software Through Object Oriented Paradigms

by Ahmad Mateen, Marriam Nazir
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 143 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Ahmad Mateen, Marriam Nazir
10.5120/ijca2016910334

Ahmad Mateen, Marriam Nazir . Evaluate The Software Through Object Oriented Paradigms. International Journal of Computer Applications. 143, 8 ( Jun 2016), 39-44. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016910334

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016910334,
author = { Ahmad Mateen, Marriam Nazir },
title = { Evaluate The Software Through Object Oriented Paradigms },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jun 2016 },
volume = { 143 },
number = { 8 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 39-44 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume143/number8/25101-2016910334/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016910334 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:45:51.248250+05:30
%A Ahmad Mateen
%A Marriam Nazir
%T Evaluate The Software Through Object Oriented Paradigms
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 143
%N 8
%P 39-44
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Programming assumes an essential part in today's electronic world. The developer utilizes diverse dialects to build up the product. Keeping in mind the end goal to create programming, it needs a few stages, for example, Analysis, Design, Implementation, Testing and Maintenance. Of these few stages, the investigation and outline get to be fundamental, since these are the most crucial component in the advancement of the product. Presently a-days, a large portion of the product is article stated, in light of the fact that the item arranged dialects give a simple approach to create and keep up the system. This item situated project is comprised of a few divisions based upon the reason. Every division performs some capacities subordinate upon the code. Every one of these divisions are then incorporated to give the single system. In the event that any blunder happened in any part of the project implies, it is important to change the influenced part of a system to expel the mistake. To keep away from this sort of pointless change with the long time term, the engineer must diagram and tests the underlying stage, for example, investigate and configuration. These sorts of tests on examination and outline for an article arranged project did by an innovation called the OOP (Object Oriented Paradigms). In this paper, an approach proposed for examination, the configuration to be completed in the improvement of the system, before begin to execute. These measurements developed by taking or gathering substantial volume of information keeping in mind the end goal to give the measurements reasonable to a wide range of Object-Oriented dialects, for example, Python, Ruby, .Net and R software for big data analysis. The proposed work gives the summing up procedure which termed as GenM (Generalized Measurement) strategy on the item situated programming. This is finished by executing the arrangement record for recognizing the mistake rate. Along these lines, this paper gives proficient systems to OOP.

References
  1. A. Chandrasekar, S. Rajesh and P. Rajesh,“A Research Study on Software Quality Attributes”,International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2014,4(1), 14-19.
  2. R. Huang, M. Li and Z. Li,“Research of Improving the Quality of the Object-Oriented System”,International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 2013,3(4), 3–6.
  3. S. K. Thakkar, K. K. Thakkar and N. M. Satra,“Object Oriented Designing and Modeling”,International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2015,5(1), 905–912.
  4. D. L. Parnas, M. Lawford,“The Role of Inspection in Software Quality Assurance”,IEEE transactions on software engineering, 2003, 29(8), 674–676.
  5. A. B. Tomar, V. M. Thakare,“A systematic study of software”, International Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 2011, 2(4), 61-70.
  6. Martin, B. 2013. Fostering Software Quality Assessment. Software Engineering (ICSE) 35th International Conference. 3(13), 1393–1396.
  7. R. Subramanyam,M. S. Krishnan, “ Empirical Analysis of CK Metrics for Object-Oriented Design Complexity : Implications for Software Defects”, IEEE transactions on software engineering, 2003, 29(4), 297–310.
  8. S. M. Rawat,“Survey on Impact of Software Metrics on Software Quality”, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2012, 3(1), 137–141.
  9. C. L. Goues, W. Weimer,“Measuring Code Quality to Improve Specification Mining”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2012, 38(1): 175-190.
  10. Alshammari, B., Fidge C. andCorney, D. 2011. A Hierarchical Security Assessment Model for Object-Oriented Programs. Faculty of Science and Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Australia, 11th International Conference on Software Quality, 4(2): 218-227.
  11. A. K. Shah,“How to improve software quality assurance in developing countries”,Advanced Computing: An International Journal, 2012,3(2), 17–28.
  12. Chandra, S. and Chen, P. M. 2000. Whither Generic Recovery from Application Faults? A Fault Study using Open-Source Software. Computer Science and Engineering Division, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan. 7(2): 97-106.
  13. Yeresime, S., Jayadeep, P. and Santanu, K. R. 2012. Effectiveness of software metrics for object-oriented systems. 2nd International Conference on Communication, Computing and Security.
  14. Selvarani, R., Gopalakrishnan, N. and Kamakshi, P. 2009. Estimation of defect proneness using design complexity measurements in object-oriented software. International Conference on Signal Processing Systems.
  15. Hycham, A. and Bruno, M. 2015. Measuring the complexity of a higraph-based system model: formulism and metrics. Conference on Systems Engineering Research.
  16. Arafat, A. M. E. and Radziah, M. 2014. Metrics for evaluating the quality of service-oriented design. 8th Malaysian Software Engineering Conference.
  17. Alberto, N., Hector, G. P., Juan, C. C. and Carlos, S. 2013. A methodology for obtaining universal software code metrics. The Iberoamerican Conference on Electronics engineering and Computer Science.
  18. Saad, A., Ed, Z. and David, C. D. R. 2011. A metrics framework for evaluating SOA service granularity. IEEE international Conference on Service Computing.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Analysis OOP Implementation Configuration File Phases Maintenance.