CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

A Target Searching Scenario in Undirected Acyclic Graph

by A. B. Sagar, Avinash Pathak
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 143 - Number 11
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: A. B. Sagar, Avinash Pathak
10.5120/ijca2016910404

A. B. Sagar, Avinash Pathak . A Target Searching Scenario in Undirected Acyclic Graph. International Journal of Computer Applications. 143, 11 ( Jun 2016), 1-6. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016910404

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016910404,
author = { A. B. Sagar, Avinash Pathak },
title = { A Target Searching Scenario in Undirected Acyclic Graph },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jun 2016 },
volume = { 143 },
number = { 11 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-6 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume143/number11/25118-2016910404/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016910404 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:46:05.248546+05:30
%A A. B. Sagar
%A Avinash Pathak
%T A Target Searching Scenario in Undirected Acyclic Graph
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 143
%N 11
%P 1-6
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In a generic problem in search theory we have some metric search space and two players - a target T and a searcher S. Mostly T is static in the space according to some specified probability distribution or in some cases dynamic, and S starts its search at some arbitrary start point. The usual goal will be to design a strategy that minimizes the expected time for S to find T. S knows the search space but has no other information and T could be a fully or partially informed target. In some versions, S has visibility characteristics allowing it to see a small distance δ from its location. This kind of exploration problems relate to various contexts, such as robot motion planning in hazardous or inaccessible terrain, maintaining security of large networks, and searching, indexing, and analyzing digital data in the Internet [1] [2] [3]. One of the earliest examples of such problems is the linear search problem, proposed by Bellman [4] and Beck [5]. Here, the search space is an infinite line, with the searcher initially at an arbitrary origin, and the target located at an unknown point on the line, at distance d from the origin. The objective is to minimize the worst-case ratio of the distance traveled by the searcher over d. Different scenario (with cycles) is considered in cops and robbers problem [6] where the cops and robbers take alternate turns in movements and the question usually posed is how many pursuers are necessary to ensure the eventual capture of all the robbers. The Isaac’s Princess and Monster problem [7] is also a related problem but with different scenario. The Lost Cow problem [8] is stated as a short-sighted cow following along an infinite fence and wants to find the gate. The lost cow problem is limited in the idea that the target is static. In case of one dimensional space, if a moving target wants to escape, then it can do so by constantly moving away from the searcher. And in case of a cyclic graph, a fully informed target can move around in cycles and never be found by the searcher. The present study stands out in that it studies the problem in case of undirected acyclic graph which was not studied before. But the proposed search space offers an interesting environment to both target and the searcher. To the target, it provides an opportunity to move towards the searcher without being found; and to the searcher it provides an easier search space by removing the case of cyclic movement of the target. Sleator and Tarjan [9] suggested evaluating the performance of an online algorithm using competitive analysis. This paper proposes an online algorithm for the provided search space and also attempts to find upper and lower bounds of the competitive ratio.

References
  1. P. Berman. On-line searching and navigation. In Online Algorithms: The State of the Art, volume 1442 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 232-241. Springer, 1998.
  2. L. Gasieniec and T. Radzik. Memory efcient anonymous graph exploration. In Proceedings of WG, volume 5344 of LNCS, pages 14-29, 2008.
  3. N. Rao, S. Kareti,W. Shi, and S. Iyengar. Robot navigation in unknown terrains: Introductory survey of nonheuristic algorithms. Report ORNL/TM-12410, Oak Ridge Nat. Lab., 1993.
  4. R. Bellman. An optimal search problem. SIAM Review, 5:274, 1963.
  5. A. Beck. On the linear search problem. Naval Research Logistics, 2:221-228, 1964.
  6. M. Aigner and M. Fromme. A game of cops and robbers. Discrete Applied Math, 8:1-12, 1984.
  7. R. Isaacs, Differential Games: A Mathematical Theory with Applications to Warfare and Pursuit, Control and Optimization, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1965), PP 349-350.
  8. LaValle, Steven M. Planning algorithms. Cambridge university press, 2006, pg 555.
  9. Sleator, Daniel D., and Robert E. Tarjan. “Amortized efficiency of list update and paging rules.” Communications of the ACM 28.2 (1985): 202-208.
  10. S.K. Ghosh, Visibility Algorithms in the Plane, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2007.
  11. J.C. Latombe, Robot Motion Planning, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 1991.
  12. A. Borodin and R. El-Yaniv. Online Computation and Competitive Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  13. Gal, S.: Search Games. Academic Press (1980)
  14. Alpern, S., Gal, S.: The Theory of Search Games and Rendezvous. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2003)
  15. R. Baeza-Yates, J. Culberson, and G. Rawlins. Searching in the plane. Information and Cmputation, 106:234-244, 1993.
  16. E.D. Demaine, S.P. Fekete, and S. Gal. Online searching with turn cost. Theoretical Computer Science, 361:342-355, 2006.
  17. P. Jaillet and M. Stafford. Online searching. Opes. Res., 49:234-244, 1993.
  18. M-Y. Kao and M.L. Littman. Algorithms for informed cows. In Proceedings of the AAAI 1997 Workshop on Online Search, 1997
  19. M-Y. Kao, Y. Ma, M. Sipser, and Y.L. Yin. Optimal constructions of hybrid algorithms. Journal of Algorithms, 29(1):142- 164, 1998.
  20. A. Lopez-Ortiz and S. Schuierer. The ultimate strategy to search on m rays. Theoretical Computer Science, 261(2):267- 295, 2001.
  21. S. Schuierer. Lower bounds in online geometric searching. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, 18(1):37-53, 2001.
  22. D.S. Bernstein, L. Finkelstein, and S. Zilberstein. Contract algorithms and robots on rays: unifying two scheduling problems. In Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 1211-1217, 2003.
  23. Angelopoulos, Spyros, Alejandro Lopez-Ortiz, and Konstantinos Panagiotou. “Multi-target ray searching problems.” Theoretical Computer Science (2014).
  24. Baeza-Yates, R. A., Culberson, J. C., and Rawlins, G. J. E. (1993), Searching in the plane, Inform. and Comput. 16, 234- 252.
  25. Fiat, A., Foster, D. P., Karloff, H., Rabani, Y., Ravid, Y., and Vishwanathan, S. (1991), Competitive algorithms for layered graph traversal, in “Proceedings, 32nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science,” pp. 288-297.
  26. Aslam, J. A., and Dhagat, A. (1991), Searching in the presence of linearly bounded errors, in “Proceedings, 23rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing,” pp. 486-493.
  27. Rivest, R. L., Meyer, A. R., Kleitman, D. J., Winklmann, K., and Spencer, J. (1980), Coping with errors in binary search procedures, J. Comput. System Sci. 20, 396-404.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Target Searching Problem Online Search Uninformed Search