CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Effect of Nodes Mobility using different Trajectories

by Arshdeep Singh Baath, Amit Grover
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 141 - Number 4
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Arshdeep Singh Baath, Amit Grover
10.5120/ijca2016909597

Arshdeep Singh Baath, Amit Grover . Effect of Nodes Mobility using different Trajectories. International Journal of Computer Applications. 141, 4 ( May 2016), 16-20. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016909597

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016909597,
author = { Arshdeep Singh Baath, Amit Grover },
title = { Effect of Nodes Mobility using different Trajectories },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2016 },
volume = { 141 },
number = { 4 },
month = { May },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 16-20 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume141/number4/24771-2016909597/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016909597 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:42:34.218413+05:30
%A Arshdeep Singh Baath
%A Amit Grover
%T Effect of Nodes Mobility using different Trajectories
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 141
%N 4
%P 16-20
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In this paper the effect of mobility of nodes at different trajectories have been analyzed on zigbee Mesh topology. Different Trajectories used are Helbert space-filling curve, hexagon trajectory and square trajectory. The effect is analyzed in terms of Throughput, Packet Loss and Media Access Delay. Results have been analyzed once by keeping 32 nodes fixed and all others moving at speed of 5 m/sec and 7 m/sec and secondly by moving 32 nodes at speed of 5m/sec and 7 m/sec and keeping all other nodes fixed. When 32 nodes are kept fixed and all other nodes are moving it has been concluded that the hexagon trajectory performs better as compare to square trajectory. Further it has been investigated that when 32 nodes moves and all other nodes are kept fixed, the performance of square trajectory is better at speed of 5 m/sec and the performance of helbert curve is better at speed of 7 m/sec.

References
  1. A. Pennacchia, P. Mazzolai and P. Dario, “Development of a Programmable Sensor Interface for Wireless Net- work Nodes for Intelligent Agricultural Applications,” Proceedings of IE, IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Sydney, 2005, pp. 1-6.
  2. Yu Chengbo et al, “ Reaserch and Application on the coverage range of the ZigBee Protocol”, IEEE ,Beijing,20-21,Sept. 2009,pp. 1-4.
  3. Boris Mihajlov et al., “Overview and Analysis of the Performances of ZigBee based Wireless Sensor Networks”, International Journal of Computer Applications Volume 29– No.12,2011, pp. 0975-8887.
  4. Yu-Kai Huang et al. “Distributed Throughput Optimization for ZigBee Cluster-Tree Network” IEEE Transaction On Parallel and Distributed Systems, VOL. 23– No.3, 2012,pp. 513-520.
  5. K. Konstantinos, X. Apostolos, K. Panagiotis and S. George, “Topology Optimization in Wireless Sensor Networks for Precision Agriculture Applications,” Sensor Technologies and applications, Velencia, 14- 20 Oct 2007, pp. 526-530.
  6. I.S. Hammodi et al, “A comprehensive performance study of OPNET modeler for ZigBee WSN” IEEE, Cardiff,Wales,15-18 Sept.2009, pp. 357-362.
  7. Harsh Dhaka et al,“Impact of Coordinator Mobility on the throughput in a Zigbee Mesh Networks” IEEE,Patiala,19-20 Feb. 2010,pp. 279-284.
  8. Ms. Sonal J. Rane, “A Simulation Study of Behaviour of Mobile Zigbee Node” (IJSRET) Volume 1-Issue6,September 2012, pp. 001-003.
  9. S. R. Ramyah , “Load Density Analysis of Mobile Zigbee Coordinator in Hexagonal Configuration” Wireless Sensor Network, Vol. 4- No. 3,2012,pp. 59-64.
  10. Neeti Bisht, et al, “Mobility Based Performance Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks” International Journal of Computer, Electronics & Electrical Engineering , Volume 2– Issue 2, 21 Oct. 2010,pp. 15-20.
  11. M. A. M. Vieira, C. N. Coelho, D. C. Jr. Silva and J. M. Mata, “Survey on Wireless Sensor Network Devices,” IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation Proceedings, Vol. 1, 16-19 Sept. 2003, pp. 537-544.
  12. J. S. Choi and M. Zhou, “Performance Analysis of Zigbee-based body sensor networks,” Systems Man and Cybernetics IEEE International Conference, Istanbul, 10-13 Oct. 2010, pp. 2427–2433.
  13. Y. Gu, A. Lo, and I. G. Niemegeers, “A survey of indoor positioning systems for wireless personal networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 11- no. 1, First Quarter 2009, pp. 13–32.
  14. Ghafoor, Saim, et al. "An efficient trajectory design for mobile sink in a wireless sensor network." Computers & Electrical Engineering , Vol. 40-no.7 ,Oct. 2014, pp. 2089-2100.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

WSN ZigBee 802.15 OPNET