CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Comparison of NEAT and Backpropagation Neural Network on Breast Cancer Diagnosis

by Hamza Turabieh
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 139 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Hamza Turabieh
10.5120/ijca2016909245

Hamza Turabieh . Comparison of NEAT and Backpropagation Neural Network on Breast Cancer Diagnosis. International Journal of Computer Applications. 139, 8 ( April 2016), 40-44. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016909245

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016909245,
author = { Hamza Turabieh },
title = { Comparison of NEAT and Backpropagation Neural Network on Breast Cancer Diagnosis },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { April 2016 },
volume = { 139 },
number = { 8 },
month = { April },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 40-44 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume139/number8/24514-2016909245/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016909245 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:40:26.292553+05:30
%A Hamza Turabieh
%T Comparison of NEAT and Backpropagation Neural Network on Breast Cancer Diagnosis
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 139
%N 8
%P 40-44
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In this paper we present a comparison between NeuroEvolution of Augmenting Typologies (NEAT) algorithm with Backpropagation Neural Network for the prediction of breast cancer. Machine learning algorithms could be used to enhance the performance of medical practitioners in the diagnosis of breast cancer. NEAT is a promising machine learning algorithm, which combines genetic algorithms and neural network. We compare the performance of these two algorithms on a standard benchmark dataset. Our results demonstrate that NEAT outperforms Backpropagation Neural Network, and we show that experimentally that NEAT has better generalization and much lower computational cost.

References
  1. C.E. Floyd, J.Y. Lo, A.J. Yun, D.C. Sullivan, and P.J. Kornguth. Prediction of breast cancer malignancy using an artificial neural network. Cancer, 74:2944–2998, 1994.
  2. D.B. Fogel, E.C. Wasson, and E.M. Boughton. Evolving neural networks for detecting breast cancer. Cancer letters, 96(1):49–53, 1995.
  3. D. Furundzic, M. Djordjevic, and A.J. Bekic. Neural networks approach to early breast cancer detection. Systems Architecture, 44:617–633, 1998.
  4. D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton, and R.J. Williams. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In J.L. McClelland D.E. Rumelhart and the PDP Research Group Eds, editors, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition., Foundations, 1, MIT Press, Cambridge, pages 318–362, 1986.
  5. Y.Z. Wu, M.L. Giger, K. Doi, C.J. Vyborny, R.A. Schmidt, and C.E. Metz. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology, 187:81–87, 1993.
  6. P. Wilding, M.A. Morgan, A.E. Grygotis, M.A. Shoffner, and E.F. Rosato. Application of backpropagation neural networks to diagnosis of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer Letter, 77:145–153, 1994.
  7. C.E. Floyd, J.Y. Lo, A.J. Yun, D.C. Sullivan, and P.J. Kornguth. Prediction of breast cancer malignancy using an artificial neural network. Cancer, 74:2944–2998, 1994.
  8. D.B. Fogel, E.C. Wasson, and E.M. Boughton. Evolving neural networks for detecting breast cancer. Cancer letters, 96(1):49–53, 1995.
  9. R. Setiono. Extracting rules from pruned neural networks for breast cancer diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 8:37–51, 1996.
  10. R. Setiono. Generating concise and accurate classification rules for breast cancer diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 18:205–219, 2000.
  11. P.C. Pendharkar, J.A. Rodger, G.J. Yaverbaum, N. Herman, and M. Benner. Association, statistical, mathematical and neural approaches for mining breast cancer patterns. Expert Systems with Applications, 17:223–232, 1999.
  12. D. Furundzic, M. Djordjevic, and A.J. Bekic. Neural networks approach to early breast cancer detection. Systems Architecture, 44:617–633, 1998.
  13. P.C. Jong, H.H. Tae, W.P. Rae, A Hybrid Bayesian Network Model for Predicting Breast Cancer Prognosis, J Kor Soc Med Informatics, 15(1):49-57, 2009.
  14. Y.Z. Wu, M.L. Giger, K. Doi, C.J. Vyborny, R.A. Schmidt, and C.E. Metz. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology, 187:81–87, 1993.
  15. P. Pornchai and B. Pleumjit. Color Based Segmentation of Nuclear Stained Breast Cancer Cell Images. IEEE transactions on electrical eng., electronics, and communications, 5(2), 2007.
  16. F. Amato , A. López, E.M. Peña-Méndez , P.Vaňhara , A. Hamp and J.Havel. Artificial neural networks in medical diagnosis. Journal of APPLIED BIOMEDICINE, 11: 47–58, 2013.
  17. O. K. Stanley and R. Miikkulainen. Evolving Neural Networks through Augmenting Topologies. Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 10, No. 2 , 99-127,2002.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

NEAT Backpropagation Breast Cancer.

Powered by PhDFocusTM