CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Survey on Evaluation Models of Vertical Handoff Decision Algorithms

by Avinash U. Jadhav, S. S. Sambare
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 135 - Number 5
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Avinash U. Jadhav, S. S. Sambare
10.5120/ijca2016908353

Avinash U. Jadhav, S. S. Sambare . Survey on Evaluation Models of Vertical Handoff Decision Algorithms. International Journal of Computer Applications. 135, 5 ( February 2016), 10-14. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016908353

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016908353,
author = { Avinash U. Jadhav, S. S. Sambare },
title = { Survey on Evaluation Models of Vertical Handoff Decision Algorithms },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2016 },
volume = { 135 },
number = { 5 },
month = { February },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 10-14 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume135/number5/24044-2016908353/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016908353 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:34:54.683242+05:30
%A Avinash U. Jadhav
%A S. S. Sambare
%T Survey on Evaluation Models of Vertical Handoff Decision Algorithms
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 135
%N 5
%P 10-14
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In Heterogeneous systems, Vertical Handoff calculations (VHAs) used to permit mobile terminals (MT) to keep up the system association when versatile hub switch starting with one remote system then onto the next one. The Vertical Handover Decision is NP-Hard issue, thus assessment of all VHA is imperative perspective while working with Vertical Handoff calculations. In this paper, we concentrated on different assessment models which were utilized by past analysts. We likewise concentrated on the different parameters which are imperative for execution examination of VHAs and represent the absence of a legitimate assessment model to look at the different Vertical Handoff Algorithms (VHAs) that have been proposed in the writing.

References
  1. M. Kassar, B. Kervella, and G. Pujolle, An overview of vertical handover decision strategies in heterogeneous wireless networks, Computer Communications, vol. 31, pp. 2607-2620, 2008.
  2. N. Nasser, A. Hasswa, and H. Hassanein, Handoffs in Fourth Generation Heterogeneous Wireless Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 93-103, October 2005.
  3. K. Yoon and C. Hwang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: AnIntroduction. S age Publications, 1995.
  4. W. Zhang, “Handover Decision Using Fuzzy MADM in HeterogeneousNetworks,” 2004 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference,Atlanta, USA, March 2004.
  5. E. Stevens-Navarro and V. W.S. Wong, Comparison between Vertical Handoff Decision Algorithms for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks,Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Melbourne, Australia,May 2006.
  6. Q. Song and A. Jamalipour, Network selection in an integrated wirelessLAN and UMTS environment using mathematical modeling andcomputing techniques, IEEE Wireless Communications, pp. 42-48, June2005.
  7. F. Bari and V. Leung, Application of ELECTRE to network selection in aheterogeneous wireless network environment, in Proc. of IEEE WirelessCommunication and Networking Conference (WCNC’07), Hong Kong,China, March 2007.
  8. Y. Wang, P. Zhang, Y. Zhou, J. Yuan, F. Liu, and G. Li, HandoverManagement in Enhanced MIH Framework for Heterogeneous WirelessNetworks Environment, Journal of Wireless Personal Communications,vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 615-636, Feb. 2010.
  9. J.R. Gallardo-Medina, U. Pineda-Rico and E. Stevens-Navarro, VIKOR Method for Vertical Handoff Decision in Beyond 3G Wireless Networks, in Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE’09), Toluca, Mexico,2009.
  10. L. Wang and D. Binet, MADM-based network selection in heterogeneouswireless networks: a simulation study, in Proc. of Wireless VITAE,Aalborg, Denmark, May 2009.
  11. Gowrishankar, G. N. Sekhar, and P. S. Satyanarayana, Analytic performability model of vertical handoff in wireless networks, Journal of computer science, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 445-450, 2009.
  12. 12. J.S Kim, E Serpedin, DR Shin, K Qaraqe, Handoff triggering and network selection algorithms for load-balancing handoff in CDMA-WLAN integrated networks. EURASIP
  13. J.Wirel. Commun. Netw 2008, 136939 (2008) (http://jwcn, 2008).
  14. eurasipjournals.com/content/2008/1/136939
  15. AEzzouhairi, A Quintero, S Pierre, A fuzzy decision making strategy for vertical handoffs. Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2008. CCECE 2008 ((Ontario, Canada, 2008), pp).
  16. Q He, A fuzzy logic based vertical handoff decision algorithm between WWAN and WLAN. 2nd International Conference on Networking and Digital Society (ICNDS), 2010, vol 2 ((Wenzhou, China, 2010), pp).
  17. T Yang, P Rong, A fuzzy logic vertical handoff algorithm with motion trend decision. 6th International Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST), 2011, vol. 2 ((Harbin, China, 2011), pp).
  18. A Aziz, S Rizvi, N Saad, Fuzzy logic based vertical handover algorithm between LTE and WLAN. International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced Systems (ICIAS), 2010 ((KLCC 2010).
  19. KS Trivedi, S Dharmaraja, X Ma, Analytic modeling of handoffs in wireless cellular networks. Inf. Sci 148(1-4), 155–166 (http://www, 2002).
  20. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002002550200292X
  21. GN Sekhar, PS Satyanarayana, Gowrishankar, Analytic performability model of vertical handoff in wireless networks. J. Comput. Sci 5, 1549–3636 (2009).
  22. H Ramesh Babu, G Raju, P Satyanarayana, Gowrishankar, Performability model of vertical handoff in wireless data network. The Fourth International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications, 2008. ICWMC’08 ((Athens, Greece, 2008), pp).
  23. 3GPP: IMT -2000 QoS classes TSG 17, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) 3GPP: QoS concepts and architecture (TS 23), . 107, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) 2009
  24. E Stevens-Navarro, U Pineda-Rico, J Acosta-Elias, Vertical handover in beyond third generation (3G) wireless networks. Int. J. Future Generation Commun. Netw 1, 1–8 (2010)
  25. K Teknomo, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) tutorial(http://people),revoledu.com/kardi/tutorial/AHP/index.html
  26. TL Saaty, in Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, vol. 6 (RWS Publications, Pitsburgh, 2000)
  27. J Stein, Survey of IEEE802.21 media independent handover services, (http://www), . cse.wustl.edu/jain/cse574-06/ftp/handover/index.html webcite
  28. E Stevens-Navarro, Y Lin, V Wong, An MDP-based vertical handoff decision algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol 57(2), 1243–1254 (2008) (Performance Engineering Lab, Derry, Northern Ireland, 2007)
  29. J Mendel, Fuzzy logic systems for engineering: a tutorial. Proc. IEEE 83(3), 345–377 (1995).
  30. S Rajasekaran, G Pai, in Neural Networks, Fuzzy Logic and Genetic Algorithms: Synthesis and Applications ((Prentice-Hall of India, 2004), http://books), . google.co.in/books?id=HDg7wCP_bmUC
  31. A Celikyilmaz, I Türkşen, in Modeling Uncertainty with Fuzzy Logic: With Recent Theory and Applications. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((Springer, 2009), http://books), . google.co.in/books?id=XNHzqfvMTbwC
  32. G Bolch, in Queueing Networks and Markov Chains: Modeling and Performance Evaluation with Computer Science Applications ((Wiley-Interscience Publication, Wiley-Interscience, 2006), http://books),.google.co.in/books?id=8Mei8w6YUHYC
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Heterogeneous Networks Vertical Handoff Algorithms Mobile Terminals Evaluation models.