CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

ECADS: Annotation Query Technique using Dynamic Form Generation Model

by Roopam Chaturvedi, Vineet Richharya, Shweta Shrivastava
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 135 - Number 3
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Roopam Chaturvedi, Vineet Richharya, Shweta Shrivastava
10.5120/ijca2016907919

Roopam Chaturvedi, Vineet Richharya, Shweta Shrivastava . ECADS: Annotation Query Technique using Dynamic Form Generation Model. International Journal of Computer Applications. 135, 3 ( February 2016), 1-5. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016907919

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016907919,
author = { Roopam Chaturvedi, Vineet Richharya, Shweta Shrivastava },
title = { ECADS: Annotation Query Technique using Dynamic Form Generation Model },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2016 },
volume = { 135 },
number = { 3 },
month = { February },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-5 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume135/number3/24026-2016907919/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016907919 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:34:42.261189+05:30
%A Roopam Chaturvedi
%A Vineet Richharya
%A Shweta Shrivastava
%T ECADS: Annotation Query Technique using Dynamic Form Generation Model
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 135
%N 3
%P 1-5
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

A large number of systems today generate and share textual descriptions of their products, services, and actions. Such assemblage of textual data contain significant amount of structured information, which reside in the unstructured text. While related information extraction algorithms facilitate the extraction of structured relations, they are often costly and defective, especially when operating on top of text that does not contain any instances of the final targeted structured information. We present a good alternative approach that facilitates the generation of the structured metadata by identifying documents that are likely to have information of interest and this information is going to be subsequently useful for querying the database. Our approach depends on the idea that instead of writing the query for each requirement it is easier to fetch them by using the annotated form based technique. In this approach user do not need to learn the correct query along with the previous information of the dataset. As a major contribution towards this paper, we present algorithms that identify structured attributes that are likely to find within the document, by jointly utilizing the content of the text and the query workload. Our experimental evaluation display that our approach generates superior results compared to approaches that go through textual content or only on the query workload, to identify attributes of our interest.

References
  1. S.R. Jeffery, M.J. Franklin, and A.Y. Halevy: proposed a paper “Pay-as-You-Go User Feedback for Data space Systems,”
  2. K. Saleem, S. Luis, Y. Deng, S.-C. Chen, V. Hristidis, and T. Li: proposed a paper “Towards a Business Continuity InformationNetwork for Rapid Disaster Recovery.
  3. J. M. Ponte and W.B. Croft: proposed a paper “A Language Modeling Approach to Information Retrieval”.
  4. R. T. Clemen and R.L. Winkler: proposed a paper “Unanimity and Compromise among Probability Forecasters.
  5. G. Tsoumakas and I. Vlahavas: propose a paper “Random Label sets: An Ensemble Method for Multilevel Classification.
  6. P. Heymann, D. Ramage, and H. Garcia-Molina: proposed a paper “Social Tag Prediction”.
  7. Y. Song, Z. Zhuang, H. Li, Q. Zhao, J. Li, W.-C. Lee, and C.L. Giles: proposed a paper “Real-Time Automatic TagRecommendation”.
  8. D. Eck, P. Lamere, T. Bertin-Mahieux, and S. Green: proposed a paper “Automatic Generation of Social Tags for MusicRecommendation.
  9. B. Sigurbjornsson and R. van Zwol: proposed a paper “Flickr Tag Recommendation Based on Collective Knowledge”.
  10. B. Russell, A. Torralba, K. Murphy, and W. Freeman: propose a paper “Label Me: A Database and Web-Based Tool for ImageAnnotation”.
  11. M. Franklin, A. Halevy, and D. Maier: propose a paper “From Databases to Data spaces: A New Abstraction for InformationManagement “.
  12. J. Madhavan et al: proposed a paper “Web-Scale Data Integration: You Can Only Afford to Pay as You Go”.
  13. S.-T. Wu, Y. Li, and Y. Xu, “Deploying Approaches for Pattern Refinement in Text Mining,” Proc. IEEE Sixth Int’l Conf. DataMining (ICDM ’06), pp. 1157-1161, 2006.
  14. D. Liu, X.-S. Hua, L. Yang, M. Wang, and H.-J. Zhang, “Tag Ranking,” Proc. 18th Int’l Conf. World Wide Web (WWW), 2009.
  15. D. Yin, Z. Xue, L. Hong, and B.D. Davison, “A Probabilistic Model for Personalized Tag Prediction,” Proc. ACM SIGKDD Int’l Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining, 2010.
  16. K. Chen, H. Chen, N. Conway, J.M. Heller stein, and T.S. Parikh, “Usher: Improving Data Quality with Dynamic Forms,” Proc. IEEE 26th Int’l Conf. Data Eng. (ICDE), 2010.
  17. M. Jayapandian and H.V. Jagadish, “Automated Creation of a Forms-Based Database Query Interface,” Proc.VLDB Endowment, vol. 1, pp. 695-709, Aug 2008.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Data mining ECADS Annotation Query Accessing Content Value Query Value