CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

A Comparative Analysis of Unicast, Multicast, Broadcast and Anycast Addressing Schemes Routing in MANETs

by Shivraj Kaur, Kulwinder Singh, Yadvinder Singh
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 133 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Shivraj Kaur, Kulwinder Singh, Yadvinder Singh
10.5120/ijca2016908001

Shivraj Kaur, Kulwinder Singh, Yadvinder Singh . A Comparative Analysis of Unicast, Multicast, Broadcast and Anycast Addressing Schemes Routing in MANETs. International Journal of Computer Applications. 133, 9 ( January 2016), 16-22. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016908001

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016908001,
author = { Shivraj Kaur, Kulwinder Singh, Yadvinder Singh },
title = { A Comparative Analysis of Unicast, Multicast, Broadcast and Anycast Addressing Schemes Routing in MANETs },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { January 2016 },
volume = { 133 },
number = { 9 },
month = { January },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 16-22 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume133/number9/23814-2016908001/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016908001 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:30:42.085641+05:30
%A Shivraj Kaur
%A Kulwinder Singh
%A Yadvinder Singh
%T A Comparative Analysis of Unicast, Multicast, Broadcast and Anycast Addressing Schemes Routing in MANETs
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 133
%N 9
%P 16-22
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The efficient addressing schemes based routing mechanism in MANETs is a challenging issue due to the dynamic nature of network topologies and resource constraints. Ad hoc networks do not rely on any fixed infrastructure. The performance of the addressing schemes such as unicast, multicast, broadcast & anycast affected by the widely varying mobility characteristics in ad hoc network. In this paper, we are giving a comparative analysis of these message addressing and transmission methods on the basis of different factors such as Time, Spectrum Efficiency, Privacy and Security. We present a comparative study of these message transmission methods and their use as a communication primitive before intrusion and after intrusion with a specific attention to Mobile ad hoc networks. We analyze and implemented these approaches and this evaluation supports our claim that Multicast is the best message transmission method in case of dynamic nature of ad hoc network. Through simulated analysis and extensive implementation, we explore the characteristics of these approaches and finally provide recommendation for best suitable approach for mobility model.

References
  1. Al-Bahadili, H. (2010). Enhancing the Performance of Adjusted Probabilistic Broadcast in MANETs. The Mediterranean Journal of Computers and Networks , 6 (4), 1-7.
  2. Camp, B. W. (n.d.). Comparison of Broadcasting Techniques for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. 1-12.
  3. Casey Carter, S. Y. (n.d.). Manycast: Exploring the Space Between Anycast and Multicast in Ad Hoc Networks. 273-285.
  4. Hadi Sargolzaey, A. A. (2009). A Review and Comparison of Reliable Unicast Routing Protocols For Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security , 9 (1), 11.
  5. Helmy, A. (n.d.). Architectural Framework for Large-Scale Multicast in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. 1-10.
  6. Hoang Lan Nguyen, U. T. (2006, AUGEST 31). A study of different types of attacks on multicast in mobile ad hoc networks. elsevier , 1-15.
  7. Li, P. M. (2004, Febuary). Group Communications in mobile adhoc networks. P u b l i s h e d b y t h e I E E E C o m p u t e r S o c i e t y , 52-59.
  8. Meghanathan, N. (2009). SURVEY AND TAXONOMY OF UNICAST ROUTING . The International Journal on Applications of Graph Theory in Wireless Ad hoc Networks and Sensor Networks , 1 (1), 21.
  9. Moukhtar A. Ali, A. E.-S. (2007). A Survey of Multicast Routing Protocols for Ad-Hoc Wireless Networks. Minufiya Journal of Electronic Engineering Research (MJEER) , 17 (2), 1-14.
  10. N.Karthikeyan, D. (2009). Performance Comparison of Broadcasting methods in Mobile Ad Hoc Network. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking , 2 (2), 47-58.
  11. Parma Nand, D. S. (2011). Performance study of Broadcast based Mobile Adhoc Routing Protocols AODV, DSR and DYMO. International Journal of Security and Its Applications , 5 (1), 53-64.
  12. Polyzos, C. N. (n.d.). Service Discovery for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: A Survey of Issues and Techniques. IEEE .
  13. Pravin Ghosekar, G. K. (2010). Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Imperatives and Challenges. IJCA Special Issue on “Mobile Ad-hoc Networks” MANETs, 2010 , 6.
  14. Roland Flury, R. W. (2007). Routing, Anycast, and Multicast for Mesh and Sensor Networks. IEEE INFOCOM , 1-9.
  15. Shafinaz Buruhanudeen, M. O. (n.d.). Mobility Models, Broadcasting Methods and Factors Contributing Towards the Efficiency of the MANET Routing Protocols: Overview. 5.
  16. Sunil Pathak, D. S. (2013). A Survey: On Unicast Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Network. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering , 3 (1), 204-210.
  17. Tapaswini Dash, B. M. (2012). A Hybrid Approach of Using Anycast Addressing With Zone Routing Protocols. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science , 9 (4), 284-296.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANETs Unicast Multicast Broadcast Anycast.