The week's pick
Random Articles
Reseach Article
An Investigation in IT Projects Failure within Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq
| International Journal of Computer Applications |
| Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA |
| Volume 133 - Number 2 |
| Year of Publication: 2016 |
| Authors: Bakhtiar M. Amen, Rebwar M. Nabi, Sardasht M. Mahmood |
10.5120/ijca2016907734
|
Bakhtiar M. Amen, Rebwar M. Nabi, Sardasht M. Mahmood . An Investigation in IT Projects Failure within Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq. International Journal of Computer Applications. 133, 2 ( January 2016), 33-39. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016907734
Abstract
The importance of information technology (IT) system has extremely become crucial for governments to reduce routines, improve transparency, systemize governmental processes, easy internal communications and enhance productivity. For these reasons, most developed countries are extremely relying on increasing IT projects to provide better services for their citizens and to enhance collaboration between their directories. The aim of this paper is to identify primarily causes of several IT projects failures with Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) and comparative with several other IT projects success and failure within developed countries such as Turkey, UAE and Estonia. Although, we are aiming to introduce and draws the gaps between IS design in KRG-IT projects factors in terms of culture, social, political and lack of experts were they have had a vital impacts on the KRG-IT projects failure. In This paper we have proposed a qualitative research approach to analysis the results and discover the reasons behind the failures. Furthermore, this study attempts to provide better solutions and recommendations to emphasis high-risk prototypes that affected IS in developed countries.
References
- AlSuwaidi, A. &Rajan, V., (2013). ‘E-government failure and Success Factors Rank Model an extension of Heeks Factor Model’, Current Trends in Information Technology (CTIT), International Conference on 2013, vol., no., P.161,165. [Online] Availableat:URLhttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&ar number=6749495&isnumber=6749463 [Accessed 10 July 2014].
- Atkinson, J.&Jourdan, C. (2008). A practical guide to risk assessment, How principles-based risk assessment enables organizations to take the right risks. PricewaterhouseCoopers
- Attarzadeh, I. and HockOw, S. (2008) ‘Project Management Practices: The Criteria for Success or Failure,’ Communications of the International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA), vol. 1, p.234-241
- Barashkwai, BotanMahmood (2012) Kurdistan:NRT, 2nd March, [Streaming video file]. Available at: http://nrttv.com/barnamakan-details.aspx?jimare=1094 [Accessed 28th February 2011].
- Charvat, J. (2003) Project Management Methodologies: Selecting, Implementing, and Supporting Methodologies and Processes for Project. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Dawson, C. (2009) Projects in Computing and Information Systems A Student’s Guide. 2nded. England: Addison-Wesley, Pearson Education Limited
- Elkadi, H. (2014). ‘Success and failure factors for e-government projects: A case from Egypt’, Egyptian Informatics Journal, Vol 14, (2), P. 165-173. [Online] Availableat:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/p ii/S1110866513000236 [Accessed 10 July 2014].
- Fortune, J. and Peters, G. (2005) Information systems Achieving Success by Avoiding Failure.England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Galorath, D. (2012). ‘Software Project Failure Costs Billions.. Better Estimation & Planning Can Help’ [Online] Available at: http://www.galorath.com/wp/software-project-ailurecosts-billions-better-estimation-planning-can-help.php [Accessed 11 November 2014].
- Gray, C. F. and Larson, E. W. (2008). Project Management: The managerial process. 4th Edition, Singapore: McGraw–Hill Educations.
- Heeks, R.(2002). ‘InformationSystemsandDeveloping Countries: Failure, Success, andLocalImprovisations’, The Information Society.Vol. 18, Iss. 2, 2002
- Jayawardena, R. and Perera, M. (2010) ‘Project success factors for Information Technology (IT) related solution deployments; a study conducted for Sri Lankan IT vendors,’ ICIAfS10, IEEE. P.453-458
- KOICA, (2012). Ex-post Evaluation Report for the projects of establishing ICT training center, KOICA: Korea
- KRG-IT Department, (2010), Annual report 2010, KRG-IT Department, Hawler-Kurdistan.
- Krg.org, (2014). The Kurdistan Region in Brief[online]Availableat:http://www.krg.org/p/p.aspx?l=12&s=020000&r=300&p=210 [Accessed 23 Nov. 2014].
- Lootah, R. Geray, O. (2006). ‘Dubai eGovernment Case Study’, OECD / UNDP Meeting: Dubai
- Mahmood, Z. (2013). "E-Government Implementation and Practice in Developing Countries." IGI Global, 2013. 1-348. [Online] Available at:doi: 10.4018/978-1- 4666-4090-0[Accessed 23 Nov. 2014].
- Mieritz, L. (2012). Gartner Survey Shows Why Projects Fail[online] Available at: http://www.learninhandteaching.info/learning/cognitive. Html [Accessed 10July 2014].
- Standing, C.,Guilfoyle, A., Lin, C. and Love, P. (2006), ‘The attribution of success and failure in IT projects,’ Industrial Management &DataSystems.vol. 106 (8), p. 1148-116. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Vit, G.(2011). ‘Competing logics: Project failure in Gaspesia’, European Management Journal, Vol 29, (3), P. 234-244. [Online] Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237310000873 [Accessed 10 July 2014].
- Wyngaard, C., Pretorius, H. and Pretorius, L. (2011) ‘Strategic management of the triple constraint trade- off dynamics - a polarity management approach, Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), IEEE International Conference. P.824-828
Index Terms
Keywords