CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Mobile-Learning Realization and its Application in Academia

by Khalid A. Fakeeh
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 133 - Number 17
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Khalid A. Fakeeh
10.5120/ijca2016908110

Khalid A. Fakeeh . Mobile-Learning Realization and its Application in Academia. International Journal of Computer Applications. 133, 17 ( January 2016), 8-16. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016908110

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016908110,
author = { Khalid A. Fakeeh },
title = { Mobile-Learning Realization and its Application in Academia },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { January 2016 },
volume = { 133 },
number = { 17 },
month = { January },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 8-16 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume133/number17/24004-2016908110/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016908110 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:31:33.746137+05:30
%A Khalid A. Fakeeh
%T Mobile-Learning Realization and its Application in Academia
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 133
%N 17
%P 8-16
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The advancement of handheld portable gadgets or devices and wireless innovation has brought about radical changes in the social and economic ways of life of contemporary or modern individuals. Today, numerous technological gadgets/devices are delivered in versatile form and individuals have ended up usual to them. These devices are reshaping client’s everyday lives in diverse ways. Be that as it may, the improvement of computerized innovations has so far been restricted to social correspondence or communication and few individuals have viewed mobile learning as a core pedagogical or educational accomplishment or activity in higher institutions of learning. Mobile learning is grabbing its predominance as it is recognized to be an intense arrangement of passing on lesson and securing knowledge as its standard qualities are at whatever time and wherever. It can be utilized from various perspectives in the education milieu or domain. We have outlined the convincing aspects in this paper that contribute for mobile learning utilization and also issues and challenges in grasping mobile learning.

References
  1. Goggin, G. (2006). Cell phone culture: Mobile technology in everyday life. New York: Routledge.
  2. Nyíri, K. (2002). Towards a philosophy of M-Learning.
  3. “O’Malley et al, (2003). MOBIlearn WP4 – Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment.
  4. Georgiev et al, (2004). M-Learning - a New Stage of Е-Learning.
  5. Kukulska-Hulme et al, 2005. Mobile learning. A handbook for educators and trainers. Open and flexible learning series, Routledge, London.
  6. Kukulska-Hulme et al,. (2007). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: Can mobile devices support collaborative practice in speaking and listening?
  7. Frohberg, D. (2002). Communities- the MOBIlearn perspective. Retrieved October 10, 2012
  8. Vavoula et al. (2009). Researching mobile learning: frameworks,tools and research designs. Oxford, UK: Peter Lang.
  9. Reynolds et al,. (2010). Web-based museum trails on PDAs for university-level design students: Design and evaluation. Computers & Education. 55(3), 994-1003.
  10. Chiou et al. (2010). An adaptive navigation support system for conducting context-aware ubiquitous learning in museums. Computers & Education, 55, 834–845.
  11. Hwang et al (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(1), 1023–1031.
  12. Hung et al (2010). Formative assessment design for PDA integrated ecology observation. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 33–42.
  13. Pfeiffera, et al. (2009). Situated learning in the mobile age: mobile devices on a field trip to the sea. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 17(3), 187–199.
  14. Chu et al (2010). A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 54(1), 289–297.
  15. Coulby et al. (2011). The use of mobile technology for work-based assessment: the student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology. 42(2). 251-265.
  16. Kukulska -Hulme A. (2002): Cognitive, ergonomic and affective aspects of PDA use for learning. Proceedings of the European Workshop on Mobile and Contextual Learning, 32-33, Birmingham, UK, June 2002
  17. Waycott J et al. (2002): Evaluating the use of PDAs as learning and workplace tools: An activity theory perspective.
  18. Keegan, D. (2003). The future of learning: From eLearning to mLearning. Retrieved September 2012.
  19. Economides, A.A., & Nikolaou, N. (n.d.): Evaluation of handheld devices for mobile learning.
  20. Ahonen et al. (2004). Mobile learning and evaluation. Digital Learning 2 project working papers.
  21. Cavus et al (2009). M-learning: an experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 78-91.
  22. Eteokleous et al (2009). Investigating mobile devices integration in higher education in Cyprus: faculty perspectives.
  23. Cohen, A. (2010). Characteristics of effective mobile learning. Retrieved June 2, 2011,
  24. Lan et al (2010). Using RSS to support mobile learning based on media richness theory. Computers & Education, 55(2), 723-732.
  25. Naismith et al (2006). Reflections on success: A retrospective of the mLearn Conference Series 2002-2005. Paper presented at the MLearn 2006 Conference, 22-25 October 2006, Banff, Canada.
  26. Luckin et al (2004). SMILE: the creation of space for interaction through blended digital technology. In J. Attewell & C. Savill-Smith (Eds.). Learning with mobile devices: research and development. London: LSDA, 87-93.
  27. Attewell et al. (2005). Engaging and Supporting Mobile Learners. Mobile learning anytime everywhere: A book of papers from mLearn 2004, London: LSDA, 15-19.
  28. BenMoussa, C. (2003). Workers on the move: new opportunities through mobile commerce. Proceeding of the International Conference e-Society (IADIS), Lisbon, Portugal, 251-256.
  29. Zhang, D. (2003). Delivery of personalized and adaptive content to mobile devices: a framework and enabling technology. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 183-202.
  30. Virvou et al (2005). Mobile educational features in authoring tools for personalized tutoring. Computers & Education, 44, 53-68. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  31. Watts, N. (1997). A Learner-based approach to computer mediated language learning. System, 25(1), 1-8.
  32. Selfe, C. (1999). Technology and literacy in the twenty-first century: The importance of paying attention. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  33. Makoe, M. (2010). Linking mobile learning to the student-centred approach. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  34. Cavus, N., & Al-Momani, M.M. (2011). Mobile system for flexible education. Procedia Computer Science. 3 (2011) 1475-1479.
  35. HandLeR project. Retrieved September 2012 from (Interim report). University of Tampere: Hypermedia Laboratory.
  36. Ketamo, H. (2002): mLearning for kindergarten’s mathematics teaching, Proceeding of IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE 2002) , 167-170, Växjö, Sweden, August 2002
  37. Prensky, M. (2007). How to teach with technology: Keeping both teachers and students comfortable in an era of exponential change. Emerging Technologies for Learning
  38. Virvou, et al (2005). Mobile educational features in authoring tools for personalized tutoring. Computers & Education, 44, 53-68.
  39. Hawisher, G. E., & Selfe, C. L. (Eds.). (1999). Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies. Logan: Utah State University Press.
  40. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  41. Phipps et al (2002). Access all areas: Disability, technology and learning. York: JISC.
  42. Uzunboylu et al (2009). Using mobile learning to increase environmental awareness. Computers & Education, 52(2), 381-389.
  43. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). Handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  44. Ocak, M. (2010). Blend or not to blend: a study investigating faculty members’ perceptions of blended teaching. World Journal on Educational Technology, 2(3), 196-205.
  45. Cavus et al (2009). Improving critical thinking skills in mobile learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 434-438.
  46. Sharples et al (2005). Towards a theory of mobile learning. Retrieved June 1, 2011,
  47. Sharples, M. (2003). Disruptive devices: mobile technology for conversational learning. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 12(5/6), 504–520.
  48. Chen et al (2002). A Mobile Scaffolding-Aid-Based Bird - Watching Learning System. Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'02), pp.15-22.
  49. Lonsdale et al. (2004). Context awareness for MOBIlearn: creating an engaging learning experience in an art museum. Proceedings of MLEARN 2004. Bracciano, Rome: LSDA.
  50. Smørdal et al, (2005). KNOWMOBILE: mobile opportunities for medical students. In A. Kukulska-Hulme & J. Traxler (Eds.),
  51. Muir et al. (2003). The pyramid of usability: A framework for quality course websites. Proceedings of EDEN 12th Annual Conference of the European Distance Education Network, The Quality Dialogue: Integrating Quality Cultures in Flexible, Distance and eLearning, Rhodes, Greece, 15-18 June 2003, 188-194.
  52. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Mobile usability and user experience. In A. Kukulska Hulme & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile Learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 45-46). London: Routledge.
  53. Trinder et al. (2005). Expect the unexpected: Practicalities and problems of a PDA project. In A. Kukulska-Hulme & J. Traxler (Eds.). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 92-8). London: Routledge.
  54. Nielsen, J. (2003). Mobile devices: One generation from useful. Retrieved August 2012
  55. Smørdal et al. (2002): PDAs in Medical Education and Practice. Proceeding of IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE 2002), (p. 140-146), Växjö, Sweden, August 2002
  56. Morg, T. (2012). Batteries on mobile devices drained more quickly by apps which are free, research says. Retrieved on October 10, 2012.
  57. E- and mobile learning system. (n.d.). Retrieved October 10, 2012.
  58. Yeaton, M. (2012). Mobile devices: the new target for data theft. Retrieved October 10, 2012
  59. Mearian, L. (2012). Mobile devices bring cloud storage and security risks to work.
  60. Traxler, J. (2004). Mobile learning – evaluating the effectiveness and the cost. In Jill Attewell and Carol Savill-Smith (eds). MobiLearn: Learning with mobile devices, research and development. LSDA: London
  61. Gitsaki et al (2013). Researching the UAE iPad Initiative. Plenary presented at the Mobile Learning: Gulf Perspectives Symposium, Abu Dhabi, April 2013.
  62. Kamali, T.A. (2013). Mobile learning from a government perspective. Panel member, UNESCO Second Mobile Learning Week. Paris, 2013.
  63. Ally et al. (2013). Improving communication skills in the workplace using mobile learning. Presentation at the UNESCO Second Mobile Learning Week. February 2013, Paris.
  64. Mims, C. (2011, 1 July). Samsung windfall: all of South Korea's textbooks to go digital by 2015. MIT Technology Review.
  65. L. Rajasingham, 2010, Critical Factors for Successful E-Learning: A Case Study of the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, E-Learn Centre, Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3), Barcelona, Spain..
  66. J. Tiffin et al, 1995, In Search of the Virtual Class: Education in an Information Society, Routledge, New York, NY, USA.
  67. J. Tiffin et al, 2003, The Global Virtual University, Routledge, New York, NY, USA
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

E-learning Mobile Learning Higher Education

Powered by PhDFocusTM