We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Experimental Study on Mail Services: A Comparison with Activity-based Performance Prediction

by Ch. Ram Mohan Reddy, K. Sailaja Kumar, D. Evangelin Geetha, T.V. Suresh Kumar
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 131 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Ch. Ram Mohan Reddy, K. Sailaja Kumar, D. Evangelin Geetha, T.V. Suresh Kumar
10.5120/ijca2015907382

Ch. Ram Mohan Reddy, K. Sailaja Kumar, D. Evangelin Geetha, T.V. Suresh Kumar . Experimental Study on Mail Services: A Comparison with Activity-based Performance Prediction. International Journal of Computer Applications. 131, 9 ( December 2015), 15-24. DOI=10.5120/ijca2015907382

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2015907382,
author = { Ch. Ram Mohan Reddy, K. Sailaja Kumar, D. Evangelin Geetha, T.V. Suresh Kumar },
title = { Experimental Study on Mail Services: A Comparison with Activity-based Performance Prediction },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { December 2015 },
volume = { 131 },
number = { 9 },
month = { December },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 15-24 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume131/number9/23477-2015907382/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2015907382 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:26:48.765163+05:30
%A Ch. Ram Mohan Reddy
%A K. Sailaja Kumar
%A D. Evangelin Geetha
%A T.V. Suresh Kumar
%T Experimental Study on Mail Services: A Comparison with Activity-based Performance Prediction
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 131
%N 9
%P 15-24
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Nowadays, mail services are used rigorously for communication purpose. Due to the widespread demand for mail services, performance degradation may occur for mail servers. Performance is an open issue that is affected by many factors including the technical factors. To identify the factors that have an impact on the performance of the mail services, we have carried out an experimental study by focusing on few prominent mail services. In this paper, the results of the experimental study and the results obtained from activity-based performance prediction approach are compared and discussed. Regression analysis is used for comparison, and the obtained value shows that both are closure to each other.

References
  1. Baskaran Alagappan, Murugappan Alagappan, S.Danish Kumar, 2009. “Web Metrics based on Page features and Visitor’s Web Behavior,” Second International Conference on Computer and Electrical Engineering, IEEE.
  2. B.Pope, “Characterizing Lotus Notes Email Clients”, 1998. In Proc. IEEE, Third Int. Workshop on Systems Management, Pages 128-132.
  3. Ch. Ram Mohan Reddy, D Evangelin Geetha, T V Suresh Kumar, K RajaniKanth, 2014. “Performance Analysis of Web Services: An Experimental Study,” Proceedings of International Conference on Circuits, Communication, Control and Computing (I4C 2014), 21-22 November.
  4. Connie U. Smith, Senior Member, ZEEE, and Lloyd G. Williams, 1993. “Software Performance Engineering: A Case Study Including Performance Comparison with Design Alternatives,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, VOL. 19, No. 7.
  5. Connie U. Smith, Lloyd G. Williams, 2000. “Building Responsive And Scalable Web Applications,” By Software Engineering Research And L&S Computer Technology, Inc. In Proceedings Computer Measurement Group Conference.
  6. Christina Catley; Dorina C. Petriu; Monique Frize, 2004. “Software Performance Engineering of a Web Service- Based Clinical Decision Support Infrastructure,” WOSP 04, ACM.
  7. Ch Ram Mohan Reddy, D Evangelin Geetha, T V Suresh Kumar, K Rajani Kanth, 2015. “Activity Based Performance Prediction for Software Systems,” Technical Report, Department of Computer Applications, M S Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Bangalore.
  8. David H. Crocker, 1982. “Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text Messages, RFC 822.”
  9. E. Kageyama, C. Maziero, and A. Santin, 2008. “A Pull-based e-mail architecture”, SAC, pages 468–472, March 2008.
  10. Hao Wang, Yizhu Tong, Hong Liu, 2006.Taoying Liu, “Application-aware Interface for SOAP Communication in Web Services”, IEEE.
  11. J R. Von Behren, S. Czerwinski, A D. Joseph, E A. Brewer, and J.Kubiatowicz, 2000. “NinjaMail: the design of a high-performance clustered, distributed e-mail system,” International Workshops on Parallel Processing, pp. 151-158.
  12. Jonathan B. Postel, “Simple Mail Transfer Protocol, RFC 821”, 1982.
  13. K. Juse, S. Kounev, and A. Buchmann, 2003.“PetStore-WS: Measuring the Performance Implications of Web Services”, 29th International Conference of the Computer Measurement Group (CMG) on Resource Management and Performance Evaluation of Enterprise Computing Systems.
  14. L. Bertolotti and M.Calzarossa, 2001. "Models of Mail Server Workloads. Performance Evaluation”, An International Journal, 46(2/3):65-76.
  15. M. Tian, T. Voigt, T. Naumowicz, H. Ritter, and J. Schiller, 2003. “Performance Impact of Web Services on Internet Servers,” International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing and Systems, Marina Del Rey, USA.
  16. M.Calzarossa, 2003. “A Tool for Mail Servers Benchmarking,” In G. Kotsis editor, Performance Evaluation - Stories and Perspectives, OCG Schriftenreihe, Pates 231-240, Austrian Computer Society.
  17. Maria Carla Calzarossa, 2004. “Performance Evaluation of Mail Systems,” Performance Tools and Applications to Networked Systems, pp 51-67, Springer.
  18. Niko Thio and Shanika Karunasekera, 2005. “Client Profiling for QoS-Based Web Service Recommendation,” Proceedings of the 12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'05) IEEE.
  19. Shah J Miah and John Gamlnack, 2008. “A Mashup Architecture for Web End-user Application Designs,” 2008 Second IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (IEEE DEST 2008) IEEE.
  20. Simon Woodman, Graham Morgan & Simon Parkin, 2003. “Portal Replication for Web Application Availability via SOAP,” Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Object-Oriented Real-Time Dependable Systems, IEEE.
  21. Seh-Joon Dokko, Sung-Hyun Yun, Tai-Yun Kim, 1997. "Development of Multimedia E-mail System Providing an Integrated Message View," IEEE.
  22. Venu Datla and Katerina Goseva-Popstojanova, “Measurement-based Performance Analysis of E-commerce Applications with Web Services Components”, 2005. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE), IEEE.
  23. W.Miles, 2002. “A high-availability high-performance E-Mail Cluster,” In Proc., of the ACM SIGUCC Conf., pp 84-88.
  24. Yan Li, Yao Liu, Liangjie Zhang, Ge Li, Bing Xie, Jiasu Sun, 2007. “An Exploratory Study of Web Services on the Internet,” International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2007), IEEE.
  25. Ying-Wen Bai and Chung-Pian Chang, 2013. "Performance measurement and analysis of e-mail cluster systems by using three IP load-balancing technologies," 26th IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), IEEE.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Web applications Mail Services Software Performance Engineering Experimental Study.