CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Sahi Pro and Selenium Webdriver

by Jagdish Singh, Monika Sharma
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 129 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Jagdish Singh, Monika Sharma
10.5120/ijca2015906991

Jagdish Singh, Monika Sharma . Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Sahi Pro and Selenium Webdriver. International Journal of Computer Applications. 129, 8 ( November 2015), 23-26. DOI=10.5120/ijca2015906991

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2015906991,
author = { Jagdish Singh, Monika Sharma },
title = { Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Sahi Pro and Selenium Webdriver },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2015 },
volume = { 129 },
number = { 8 },
month = { November },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 23-26 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume129/number8/23095-2015906991/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2015906991 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:23:47.034201+05:30
%A Jagdish Singh
%A Monika Sharma
%T Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Sahi Pro and Selenium Webdriver
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 129
%N 8
%P 23-26
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Software testing is a crucial phase in software development life cycle that reduce errors, cut maintenance and overall software costs. Manual testing takes a lot of time and effort, so automation tools are used by testers. There are number of automation testing tools available, but to choose the appropriate tool for the task requires various parameters to be considered. In this paper an evaluation on web-based software testing tools; Sahi Pro and Selenium Webdriver, based on execution time, recording and playback efficiency, browser and platform compatibility, result reporting, ease of learning and cost has been presented. It will help testers to take informed decision to choose a tool according to their requirements and resources.

References
  1. A. Gargantini and E. Riccobene, “ASM-Based Testing: Coverage Criteria and Automatic Test Sequence,” J.UCS: Journal of Universal Computer Science, pp. 1050–1067, 2001.
  2. F. Wang, W. Du, “A Test Automation Framework Based on WEB,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer and Information Science. IEEE/ACIS, pp. 683-687, 2012.
  3. B. Haugset, G. K. Hanssen,“Automated Acceptance Testing: a Literature Review and an Industrial Case Study”, in Proceedings of the Agile 2008 Conference, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 27-32, 2008.
  4. Monika Sharma, Rigzin Angmo,“Web based Automation testing and Tools”, , International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technonologies (IJCSIT), ISSN: 0975-9646, Vol. , ISSUE 1, pp. 908-912, 2014.
  5. Bharath Cheluvaraju, Kartikay Nagal, Anjaneyulu Pasala,”Mining Software Revision History using Advanced Social Network Analysis”, 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, pages 717-720, IEEE, 2012.
  6. Manjeet. Kaur, Raj. Kumari, “Comparative Study of Automated Testing Tools: TestComplete and QuickTest Pro”, International Journal of Computer Application, vol 24, no. 1, 2011.
  7. Rigzin Angmo, Monika Sharma, “Selenium Tool: A Web based Automation Testing Framework”, IJETCAS, 2279-0055.
  8. H. Kaur,Dr. G. Gupta, “Comparative Study of automation testing tools:selenium, quick test professional and testcomplete,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1739-1743, 2013.
  9. Rigzin Angmo, Monika Sharma, “Performance Evaluation of Web Based Automation Testing Tools”, 5th International Conference- Confluence The Next Generation Information Technology Summit, pp. 731-735, 2014.
  10. Thanuja Naidu, Nor Basri, Saravanan Nagenthram, “SAHI vs. Selenium: A Comparative Analysis” IEEE, pp. 967-970, 2014.
  11. R. Rattan and Shallu, “Performance Evaluation & Comparison of Software Testing Tool,” International Journal of Information and Computation Technology, vol 3, no. 7, pp. 711-716, 2013.
  12. M. Sharma, R. Angmo,“Web based Automation testing and Tools,” International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technonologies (IJCSIT), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 08-912, 2014.
  13. I. Singh, B. Tarika, “Comparative Analysis of Open Source Automated Software Testing Tools: Selenium, Sikuli and Watir” International Journal of Information & Computation Technology, vol 4, pp. 1507-1518, 2015.
  14. Rafi, “Benefits and limitations of automated software testing: Systematic literature review and practitioner survey”, Automation of Software Test, IEEE, pp. 36-42, 2012.
  15. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_automation
  16. http:/www.seleniumhq.org
  17. B. Kitchenham and S. Charters, "Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering," Software Engineering Group, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University, Tech. Rep. EBSE-2007-01, July 2007.
  18. N. Nie, “Reliability and Performance Testing Model of Web_Based User Login and Access Control”, IEEE, pp 1-4, 2010.
  19. S. Shoney, “An Adaptive Framework for Web Services Testing Automation Using JMeter”, IEEE, pp. 314-418, 2014.
  20. Z. Wandon, “Design and Implementation of a Web Application Automation Testing Framework”, IEEE, pp. 316-318, 2009.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Automaiton testing tools Sahi Pro Selenium Webdriver.