CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Computational Modeling and Experimental Evaluation of the Effects of Electrode Geometry and Deposition Target on Electrostatic Spraying Processes

by Manoj K. Patel, Tanveer Sharma, Manoj K. Nayak, C. Ghanshyam
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 124 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Manoj K. Patel, Tanveer Sharma, Manoj K. Nayak, C. Ghanshyam
10.5120/ijca2015905358

Manoj K. Patel, Tanveer Sharma, Manoj K. Nayak, C. Ghanshyam . Computational Modeling and Experimental Evaluation of the Effects of Electrode Geometry and Deposition Target on Electrostatic Spraying Processes. International Journal of Computer Applications. 124, 2 ( August 2015), 10-15. DOI=10.5120/ijca2015905358

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2015905358,
author = { Manoj K. Patel, Tanveer Sharma, Manoj K. Nayak, C. Ghanshyam },
title = { Computational Modeling and Experimental Evaluation of the Effects of Electrode Geometry and Deposition Target on Electrostatic Spraying Processes },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2015 },
volume = { 124 },
number = { 2 },
month = { August },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 10-15 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume124/number2/22075-2015905358/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2015905358 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:13:19.993408+05:30
%A Manoj K. Patel
%A Tanveer Sharma
%A Manoj K. Nayak
%A C. Ghanshyam
%T Computational Modeling and Experimental Evaluation of the Effects of Electrode Geometry and Deposition Target on Electrostatic Spraying Processes
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 124
%N 2
%P 10-15
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Electrostatic force field application is one of the most promising methods for spraying protective liquid sprays onto the biological surfaces of crops, orchards, vineyards and trees, because electrostatic space charge and image deposition forces enhance the uniformity of spray on the target surface and increases the transfer efficiency, mass transfer and adhesion. The study has been carried out to know the effects of electrode geometry, deposition target and spray cloud through computational modeling using COMSOL Multiphysics. In this work, four different shaped targets, four different geometry of electrodes and four stages of spray cloud are analyzed to know the effects of resultant electric field to charge the conductive liquid sprays. Comparative study of electric field among all the four shaped targets resulted that elliptical target has the maximum resultant electric field followed by conical, spherical and cylindrical target respectively. Similarly in case of electrode geometry, electric field of square electrode with circular cross-section found to be optimum followed by circular electrode with circular cross-section, circular electrode with square cross section and square electrode with square cross section respectively. The experimental results are in good agreement with computational modeling of charging the liquid sprays.

References
  1. M.K. Patel, Hemant K Sahoo, Manoj K Nayak, Ashwani Kumar, C Ghanshyam, and Amod Kumar, “Electrostatic Nozzle: New Trends in Agricultural Pesticides Spraying”, SSRG International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2015, pp. 6-11.
  2. M.K. Patel, C. Ghanshyam, and P. Kapur, “Characterization of electrode material for electrostatic spray charging: Theoretical and Engineering Practices”, Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 71, 2013, pp. 55-60.
  3. V.R. Mamidi, C. Ghanshyam, M.K. Patel, and P. Kapur, “Electrostatic hand pressure Knapsack spray system with enhanced performance for small scale forms”, Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 71, no. 4, 2013, pp. 785-790.
  4. Y. Ru, J.Q. Zheng and H.P. Zhou, “Design and test study on double acicular electrostatic device of High-range Electrostatic Sprayer”, Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, vol. 31, no. 6, 2007, pp. 87-90.
  5. G.N. Laryea, and S.Y. No, “Development of electrostatic pressure-swirl nozzle for agricultural applications”, Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 57, no. 2, 2003, pp. 129-142.
  6. N. Chigier, “Challenges for future research in atomization and spray technology: Arthur Lefebvre Memorial Lecture”, 16, 2006, pp. 727-736.
  7. Y. Ru, J.Q. Zheng, H.P. Zhou, and C. Shu, “Electric field distribution produced by circular electrode of induce charging nozzle”, Transactions of Chinese Society of Agriculture and Engineering. 5, 2008.
  8. B.M. Maynagh, B. Ghobadian, and M.R. Jahannama, “Effect of electrostatic induction parameters on droplets charging for agricultural application”, Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 3, 2009, pp. 249-257.
  9. S. Zhao, G.S.P. Castle and K. Admiak, “The effect of space charge on the performance of an electrostatic induction charging spray nozzle”, Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 63, no. 3-4, 2005, pp. 261-272.
  10. R.S. Sasaki, M.M. Teixeira, H.C. Fernandes, P. M. de B. Monteiro, D.E. Rodrigues, and C. B. de Alvarenga, “Parameters of electrostatic spraying and its influence on the application efficiency”, Revsta Ceres, vol. 60, no. 4, 2013, pp. 474-479.
  11. S. Zhao, G.S.P. Castle, and K. Adamiak K., “Comparison of conduction and induction charging in liquid spraying”, Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 63, no. 6-10, 2005, pp. 871-876.
  12. M.K. Patel, C. Ghanshyam, V.R Mamidi, and Pawan Kapur, “Selection of electrode material for spray charging in electrostatic nozzle”, The Journal of Instrument Society of India, vol. 42, no. 4, 2012, pp. 272-275.
  13. V.R. Mamidi, C. Ghanshyam, M.K. Patel, and Pawan Kapur, “Electrostatic Hand Pressure Swirl Nozzle for Small Crop Growers”, International Journal of Applied Science and Technology Research Excellence, vol. 2, no. 2, 2012, pp. 164-168.
  14. W. Machowski, and W. Balachandran, “Design of Electrostatic Fog Generator Using a Reverse Field Modeling Technique”, Industry Applications Conference, Thirty-Second IAS Annual Meeting, IAS, vol. 97, no. 3, 1997, pp. 1784-1789.
  15. D. Maski, and D. Durairaj, “Effects of electrode voltage, liquid flow rate, and liquid properties on spray chargeability of an air-assisted electrostatic-induction spray-charging system”, Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 68, 2010, pp. 152-158.
  16. A. Chaim, M.C.P.Y. Pessoa, and V.L. Ferracini, “Eficiência de deposição de pulverização em videira comparando bicos e pulverizadores” Pesticidas: revista de ecotoxicologia e meio ambiente, vol. 14, 2004, pp. 39-46.
  17. J.S. Shrimpton, “Electrohydrodynamics of charge injection atomization: regimes and fundamental limits”, Atomization and Sprays, vol. 13, 2003, pp. 173-190.
  18. M.K. Patel, C. Ghanshyam, V.R. Mamidi, and Pawan Kapur, “Performance and Characterization of Different Material Electrodes in Electrostatic Pesticide Spraying Nozzle System”, International Journal of Applied Science and Technology Research Excellence, vol. 2, no. 2, 2012, pp. 158-163.
  19. Y. Ru, H. Zhou and J. Zheng, “Design and Experiments on Droplet Charging Device for High Range Electrostatic Sprayer” Book- Pesticides in the Modern World- Pesticides Use and Management, 2011.
  20. W. Jia, F. Xeu, B. Qui and Z. Wang “Design and Performance of Inductive Electrostatic Sprayer”, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, vol. 5, no. 21, 2013, pp. 5102-5106.
  21. M. Al-Mamury, N. Manivannan, H. Al-raweshidy, and W. Balachandran, “Computation Model of Electrostatic Spraying in Agriculture Industry”, Excerpt from the Proceedings of the 2014 COMSOL Conference in Cambridge, 2014.
  22. W. Balachandran, D. Hu, A. Yule, J.S. Shrimpton, and A.P. Watkins, “Electro-statically produced fuel sprays for combustion applications”, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, vol. 38, no. 6, 1997, pp. 421-422.
  23. M.K. Patel and C. Ghanshyam, “Fundamentals of Electrostatic Spraying: Basic Concepts and Engineering Practices”, in: Srivastava, K., Singh, S. (Eds.), Uncovering New Methods for Ecosystem Management through Bioremediation, IGI Global Publishing, 2015, pp. 468-495.
  24. E.A. Badea, J. Oesterheld, S. Friedel and M. Olsson, “Accessing COMSOL Performances on Typical Electromagnetic Problems Faced by Turbo-Generator Manufacturers” Excerpt from the Proceedings of the 2012 COMSOL Conference in Milan, 2012.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Aerodynamics Deposition characteristics Electrodynamics Hydrodynamics Induction charging Spray cloud