CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Comparative Study of Type-1 Fuzzy Logic and Type-2 Fuzzy Logic

by Neeru Lalka, Sushma Jain
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 124 - Number 16
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Neeru Lalka, Sushma Jain
10.5120/ijca2015905802

Neeru Lalka, Sushma Jain . Comparative Study of Type-1 Fuzzy Logic and Type-2 Fuzzy Logic. International Journal of Computer Applications. 124, 16 ( August 2015), 14-21. DOI=10.5120/ijca2015905802

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2015905802,
author = { Neeru Lalka, Sushma Jain },
title = { Comparative Study of Type-1 Fuzzy Logic and Type-2 Fuzzy Logic },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2015 },
volume = { 124 },
number = { 16 },
month = { August },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 14-21 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume124/number16/22187-2015905802/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2015905802 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:14:35.410805+05:30
%A Neeru Lalka
%A Sushma Jain
%T Comparative Study of Type-1 Fuzzy Logic and Type-2 Fuzzy Logic
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 124
%N 16
%P 14-21
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Medical diagnosis is a complex process which can be attributed to the complexities, uncertainties and vagueness of the symptoms involved, and sometimes also because of their complex relationship with the final diagnosis output. Traditional systems for diagnosis very often incorporate certain inabilities that eventually lead to the vagueness in the result. Besides this, imprecise and incomplete knowledge are difficult for these traditional disease diagnosis expert systems to analyze. The fuzzy logic has carved a niche in medical diagnosis, for its ability to handle the dynamic nature of the disease diagnosis and medication. Various approaches of Fuzzy Logic, namely, Type-1 Fuzzy Logic, Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic, and General Type-2 Fuzzy Logic are being used for decision making in medical diagnosis. In this paper, a comparative study of the various parameters of Type-1 Fuzzy Logic and Interval type-2 Fuzzy Logic is conducted to understand their respective advantages in the medical diagnosis. Former, being a standard fuzzy logic methodology has been used widely for diagnosis of almost every disease, and the latter, which is also known as ' Layered Type-1 Fuzzy Logic', is being widely used for the diagnosis of a few diseases only. Type-1 Fuzzy Logic is rather a simple approach and results in the fast generation of outputs, but Type-2 Fuzzy Logic can provide better results in many cases. A study is conducted on type-2 diabetes and heart related diseases, to understand the disease-specific nature of the two approaches. Type-2 Fuzzy Logic uses Karnik-Mendel (K-M) algorithm for type reduction. The comparison is drawn on the basis of accuracy, rule base and the differences of their outputs. In this way, this analysis helps to understand the advantages and disadvantages of both the approaches in the medical diagnosis.

References
  1. Lee, C. and Wang, M. 2010. A Fuzzy System for Diabetes Decision Support Application. IEEE International Journal on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Vol. 41-No. 1, pp. 139-153.
  2. Calegari, S. and Sanchez, E. 2007. A Fuzzy Ontology-Approach to improve Semantic Information Retrieval. Uncertainty Reasoning of Semantic Web. Vol. 327, pp. 1-6.
  3. Abadi, D. N. M., Khooban, M. H., and Siahi, M. 2011. A Novel Automated Fuzzy Model for Diabetes Mellitus. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd International Conference on Control, Instrumentation and Automation (ICCIA), pp. 350-354.
  4. Gadaras, I. and Mikhailov, L. 2009. An interpretable fuzzy rule-based classification methodology for medical diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Vol. 42-No. 1, pp. 25-41.
  5. Yager, R. R. and Petry, F. E. 2006. A Multicriteria Approach to Data Summarization Using Concept Ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. Vol. 14-No. 6, pp. 767-780.
  6. Palma, J., Juarez, J. M., Campos, M., and Marin, R. 2006. Fuzzy theory approach for temporal model-based diagnosis: An application to medical domains. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Vol. 38-No. 2, pp. 197-218.
  7. Seising, R. 2006. From vagueness in medical thought to the foundations of fuzzy reasoning in medical diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Vol. 38-No. 3, pp. 237-256.
  8. Straszecka, E. 2006. Combining uncertainty and imprecision in models of medical diagnosis. Information Sciences. Vol. 176-No. 20, pp. 3026-2059.
  9. Kalpana, M. and Kumar, A. V. S. 2011. Fuzzy Expert System for Diagnosis of Diabetes Using Fuzzy Determination Mechanism. International Journal of Computer Science and Emerging Technology. Vol. 2-No. 6, pp. 39-45.
  10. Das, S. and Kar, S. 2014. Group decision making in medical system: An intuitionistic fuzzy softest. Applied Soft Computing. Vol. 24, pp. 196-211.
  11. Mahfouf, M., Abbod, M. F., and Linkens, D. A. 2001. A survey of fuzzy logic monitoring and control utilisation in medicine. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Vol. 21-No. 1-3, pp. 27-41.
  12. Innocent, P. and John, R. 2004. Computer aided fuzzy medical diagnosis. Information Sciences. Vol. 162, pp. 81-104.
  13. Kahramanli, H. and Allahverdi, N. 2008. Design of a hybrid system for the diabetes and heart diseases. Expert Systems with Applications. Vol. 35-No. 1-3, pp. 82-89.
  14. Gupta, N. K., Gupta, A., and Tyagi, P. K. 2014. Early Detection of Diabetes Patients using Soft Computing. In Proceedings of International Conference on Issues and Challenges in Intelligent Computing Techniques (ICICT). pp. 174-179.
  15. Anouncia, S. M., Madonna, L. J. C., Jeevitha, P., and Nandhini, R. T. 2013. Design of a Diabetic Diagnosis System Using Rough Sets. Cybernetics and Information Technologies. Vol. 13-No. 3, pp. 124-139.
  16. Lee, C. S., Wang, M. H., and Hagras, H. 2010. A Type-2 Fuzzy Ontology and Its Application to Personal Diabetic-Diet Recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. Vol. 18, pp. 374-395.
  17. Mendel, J. M., Hagras, H., and John, R. I. 2013. Guest Editorial for the Special Issue on Type-2 Fuzzy Sets and Systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. Vol. 21-No. 3, pp. 397-398.
  18. Yeh, C. W., Jeng, R., and Lee, S. 2011. An Enhanced Type-Reduction Algorithm for Type-2 Fuzzy Sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. Vol. 19-No. 2, pp. 227-240.
  19. Aladi, J. H., Wagner, C., and Garibaldi, J. M. 2014. Type-1 or INTERVAL Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems - On the Relationship of the Amount of Uncertainty and FOU Size. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Fuzzy Systems. pp. 2360-2367.
  20. Campos-Delgado, D., Hernández-Ordoñez, M., Femat, R., and Gordillo-Moscoso, A. 2006. Fuzzy-Based Controller for Glucose regulation in Type-1 Diabetic Patients by Subcutaneous Route. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. Vol. 51-No. 11, pp. 2201-2209.
  21. Grant, P. 2007. A new approach to diabetic control: Fuzzy logic and insulin pump technology. Medical Engineering & Physics. Vol. 29-No. 7, pp. 824-827.
  22. Nazari, D., Abadi, M., Khooban, M. H., and Siahi, M. 2011. A Novel Automated Fuzzy Model for Diabetes Mellitus. In proceedings of IEEE 2nd International Conference on Control, Instrumentation and Automation (ICCIA). pp. 350-354.
  23. Adeli, A. and Neshat, M. 2010. A Fuzzy Expert System for Heart Disease Diagnosis. In Proceedings of International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. pp. 1-6.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Type-1 Fuzzy Logic (T1FL) Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic (T2FL) Centroid method Rule Inference Type-reduction Rule aggregation Apriori algorithm Karnik-Mendel algorithm Uncertainty indicator.

Powered by PhDFocusTM