CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

An Image Fusion Approach based on Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Model with Local Level Processing

by Yashwant Kurmi, Vijayshri Chaurasia
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 124 - Number 1
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Yashwant Kurmi, Vijayshri Chaurasia
10.5120/ijca2015905317

Yashwant Kurmi, Vijayshri Chaurasia . An Image Fusion Approach based on Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Model with Local Level Processing. International Journal of Computer Applications. 124, 1 ( August 2015), 39-42. DOI=10.5120/ijca2015905317

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2015905317,
author = { Yashwant Kurmi, Vijayshri Chaurasia },
title = { An Image Fusion Approach based on Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Model with Local Level Processing },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2015 },
volume = { 124 },
number = { 1 },
month = { August },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 39-42 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume124/number1/22072-2015905317/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2015905317 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:13:17.856499+05:30
%A Yashwant Kurmi
%A Vijayshri Chaurasia
%T An Image Fusion Approach based on Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Model with Local Level Processing
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 124
%N 1
%P 39-42
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Image fusion has lots of application in real life to furnish a combined form of many oriented objects of different images into single image. Adaptive Fuzzy logic model with local level processing is a controlling tool to model image characteristics accurately and been successfully applied to a large number of image processing applications. In this paper an adaptive fuzzy logic model have been proposed with local level processing for fusion of multi-exposure and multi-sensor images. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of proposed method; it offers approximately 30%-35% improvement in Universal image quality index (UIQI) as compared to Marcov Random Field (MRF) fusion method.

References
  1. R. S. Blum, 2006 “On multisensor image fusion performance limits from an estimation theory perspective” Inf. Fusion, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 250–263.
  2. Z. Wang, D. Ziou, C. Armenakis, D. Li, and Q. Li Jun. 2005 “A comparative analysis of image fusion methods” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1391–1402..
  3. C. Thomas, T. Ranchin, L. Wald, and J. Chanussot, May 2008 “Synthesis of multispectral images to high spatial resolution: A critical review of fusion methods based on remote sensing physics” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1301–1312.
  4. C. Pohl and J. van Genderen, 1998 “Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: Concepts, methods, and applications” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 823–854.
  5. P. K. Varshney, B. Kumar, M. Xu, A. Drozd, and I. Kasperovich, 2005, “Image registration: A tutorial” In Proc. NATO ASI, Albena, Bulgaria.
  6. R. K. Sharma, T. K. Leen, and M. Pavel, 1999 “Probabilistic image sensor fusion” In Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 11, pp. 824–830.
  7. H.-M. Chen, S. Lee, R. Rao, M.-A. Slamani, and P. Varshney, Mar. 2005 “Imaging for concealed weapon detection: A tutorial overview of development in imaging sensors and processing,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 52–61.
  8. Y. Zhang, S. De Backer, and P. Scheunders , Nov. 2009 , “Noise-resistant wavelet based Bayesian fusion of multispectral and hyperspectral images,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 3834–3843.
  9. J. Yang and R. Blum, 2002, “A statistical signal processing approach to image fusion for concealed weapon detection” In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process., , pp. 513–516.
  10. S. M. Kay, 1993, “Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory”. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  11. Y. C. Eldar, A. Beck, and M. Teboulle, 2007 “Bounded error estimation: A Chebyshev center approach. In Proc. 2nd IEEE Int. Workshop Comput. Adv. Multi-Sensor Adapt. Process, pp. 205–208,.
  12. P. Bremaud, M. Chains, 1999, “Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues”, New York: Springer-Verlag,.
  13. H. Derin and H. Elliott, Jan. 1987 “Modeling and segmentation of noisy and textured images using Fuzzy Gibbs Random Fields”. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. PAMI-9, no. 1, pp. 39–55,.
  14. T. Kasetkasem, Dec., 2002 “Image analysis methods based on Markov random field models” Ph.D. dissertation, Syracuse Univ., Syracuse, NY.
  15. J. Besag, 1986 “ On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures” J. R. Stat. Soc., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 259–302,.
  16. M. Xu,, H. Chen, and P. K. Varshney, Dec. 2011, “An Image Fusion Approach Based on Markov Random Fields”. IEEE Transactions On Geoscience And Remote Sensing, Vol. 49, No. 12.
  17. Y. Zhang, S. De Backer, and P. Scheunders, Nov. 2009, “Noise-Resistant Wavelet-Based Bayesian Fusion of Multispectral and Hyperspectral Images”, IEEE Transactions On Geoscience And Remote Sensing, Vol. 47, No. 11.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Adaptive Fuzzy logic local level processing Multiresolution decomposition Multispectral image fusion