CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Article:A Novel Image Denoising using Matched Partial Biorthogonal Wavelets and Adaptive Thresholding

by Prashant Bhati, Mukesh Tiwari
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 12 - Number 7
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Prashant Bhati, Mukesh Tiwari
10.5120/1687-2248

Prashant Bhati, Mukesh Tiwari . Article:A Novel Image Denoising using Matched Partial Biorthogonal Wavelets and Adaptive Thresholding. International Journal of Computer Applications. 12, 7 ( December 2010), 41-45. DOI=10.5120/1687-2248

@article{ 10.5120/1687-2248,
author = { Prashant Bhati, Mukesh Tiwari },
title = { Article:A Novel Image Denoising using Matched Partial Biorthogonal Wavelets and Adaptive Thresholding },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { December 2010 },
volume = { 12 },
number = { 7 },
month = { December },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 41-45 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume12/number7/1687-2248/ },
doi = { 10.5120/1687-2248 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:01:04.805710+05:30
%A Prashant Bhati
%A Mukesh Tiwari
%T Article:A Novel Image Denoising using Matched Partial Biorthogonal Wavelets and Adaptive Thresholding
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 12
%N 7
%P 41-45
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The denoising of a natural image corrupted by Gaussian noise is a problem in signal or image processing Even though much work has been done in the field of wavelet thresholding, most of it was focused on statistical modeling of wavelet coefficients and the optimal choice of thresholds. This paper describes a new method for suppression of noise in image by fusing the wavelet Denoising technique with optimized thresholding function, improving the denoised results significantly by using partial biorthogonal wavelets. In today’s scenario denoising techniques use the classical orthonormal wavelets for decomposition of an image corrupted with additive white Gaussian noise, upon which various thresholding strategies are built. We present a method to design partial biorthogonal wavelet bases and report on their potential for denoising. This paper describes a new method for suppression of noise in image by fusing the wavelet Denoising technique with optimized thresholding function, improving the denoised results significantly. Simulated noise images are used to evaluate the denoising performance of proposed algorithm along with another wavelet-based denoising algorithm. Experimental result shows that the proposed denoising method outperforms standard wavelet denoising techniques in terms of the PSNR and the preservation of edge information. The use of available biorthogonal wavelets in image denoising is less common because of their poor performance. But when we combine the approach of fusion with partial biorthogonal wavelets then the performance is increases in comparison of traditional methodology. This point to the importance of matching when using wavelet-based denoising.

References
  1. D. L. Donoho and I. M. Johnstone. Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika, 81:425–455, March 1994.
  2. G. Chang, B. Yu, and M. Vetterli. Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. IEEE Transa-tions on Image Processing, 9:1532–1546, September 2000.
  3. L. Sendur and I.W. Selesnick. Bivariate shrinkage functions for wavelet-based denoising exploiting interscale dependency.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50:2744–2756, November 2002
  4. J. Portilla, V. Strela, M. Wainwright, and E. Simoncelli. Image denoising using scale mixtures of gaussians in the wavelet domain. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,12:1338–1351, November 2003.
  5. J. O. Chapa and R. M. Rao. Algorithms for designing wavelets to match a specified signal. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2000.
  6. A. H. Twefik, D. Sinha, and P. Jorgensen. On the optimal choice of a wavelet for signal representation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 38:747–765, February 1992.
  7. A. Gupta, S. D. Joshi, and S. Prasad. A new approach for estimation of statistically matched wavelet. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 53:1778–1793, May 2005.
  8. I. Daubechies. (1992). ‘‘Ten Lectures on Wavelets”, Philadelphia SIAM.
  9. M. S. Crouse, R. D. Nowak, and R. G. Baraniuk, “Wavelet-based statistical signal processing-Markov models,"IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 886-902, April 1998.
  10. J. K. Romberg, H. Choi, and R. Baraniuk, “Bayesian tree-structured image modeling using wavelet-domain hidden Markov model," in Proc. of SPIE, Denver, CO, July 1999, vol. 3816, pp. 31.
  11. S. Mallat. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition:The wavelet representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal.Mach. Intell., 11:674–693, July 1989.
  12. A. Gupta, S. D. Joshi, and S. Prasad. A new approach for estimation of statistically matched wavelet. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 53:1778–1793, May 2005.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Prashant Bhati Mukesh Tiwari