We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Reseach Article

Article:Simulation based Performance Comparison of AODV, FSR and ZRP Routing Protocols in MANET

by Ashish K. Maurya, Dinesh Singh
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 12 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Ashish K. Maurya, Dinesh Singh
10.5120/1651-2220

Ashish K. Maurya, Dinesh Singh . Article:Simulation based Performance Comparison of AODV, FSR and ZRP Routing Protocols in MANET. International Journal of Computer Applications. 12, 2 ( December 2010), 23-28. DOI=10.5120/1651-2220

@article{ 10.5120/1651-2220,
author = { Ashish K. Maurya, Dinesh Singh },
title = { Article:Simulation based Performance Comparison of AODV, FSR and ZRP Routing Protocols in MANET },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { December 2010 },
volume = { 12 },
number = { 2 },
month = { December },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 23-28 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume12/number2/1651-2220/ },
doi = { 10.5120/1651-2220 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:00:38.683000+05:30
%A Ashish K. Maurya
%A Dinesh Singh
%T Article:Simulation based Performance Comparison of AODV, FSR and ZRP Routing Protocols in MANET
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 12
%N 2
%P 23-28
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET) is a collection of mobile nodes that are arbitrarily located so that the interconnections between nodes are dynamically changing. In MANET mobile nodes forms a temporary network without the use of any existing network infrastructure or centralized administration. A routing protocol is used to find routes between mobile nodes to facilitate communication within the network. The main goal of such an ad hoc network routing protocol is to establish correct and efficient route between a pair of mobile nodes so that messages delivered within the active route timeout interval. Route should be discovered and maintained with a minimum of overhead and bandwidth consumption. This paper presents performance evaluation of three different routing protocols i.e. Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Fisheye State Routing (FSR) and Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) in variable pause times and variable number of nodes. We have used random waypoint mobility model to design the network and performed simulations by using QualNet version 5.0 Simulator [1] from Scalable Networks. Performance of AODV, FSR and ZRP is evaluated based on Average end-to-end delay, Packet delivery ratio, Throughput and Average Jitter.

References
  1. The QualNet simulator www.scalable-networks.com.
  2. Elizabeth, Royer, Chai-Keong, Toh: “A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks,” IEEE Personal Communications, April 1999,
  3. Charles E. Perkins and Elizabeth M. Royer. "Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing." Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pp. 90-100, New Orleans, LA, February 1999.
  4. Chakeres, I.D.; Belding-Royer, E.M.; "AODV routing protocol implementation design," Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW’04), pp. 698- 703, 23-24 March 2004
  5. Guangyu Pei; Gerla, M.; Tsu-Wei Chen; “Fisheye state routing: a routing scheme for ad hoc wireless networks,” IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2000.
  6. Zone Routing Protocol by Nicklas Beijar, Networking laboratory, Helsinki University Of technology, Finland. Licentiate course on Telecommunications Technology, 2002
  7. Z. Haas and M. Pearlman. The performance of query control scheme for the zone routing protocol. ACM/IEEE Transactions on Networking, 9(4) pages 427-438, August 2001.
  8. Pearlman, Marc R., Haas, Zygmunt J.: Determining the Optimal Configuration for the Zone Routing Protocol, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 17, No. 8, August 1999
  9. Haas, Zygmunt J., Pearlman, Marc R., Samar, P.: Intrazone Routing Protocol (IARP), June 2001, IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-iarp-01.txt
  10. Haas, Zygmunt J., Pearlman, Marc R., Samar, P.: Interzone Routing Protocol (IERP), June 2001, IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-ierp-01.txt
  11. Haas, Zygmunt J., Pearlman, Marc R., Samar, P.: The Bordercast Resolution Protocol (BRP) for Ad Hoc Networks, June 2001, IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-brp-01.txt
  12. David Oliver Jorg, “Performance Comparison of MANET Routing Protocols In Different Network Sizes”, Computer Science Project, Institute of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Computer Networks and Distributed Systems (RVS), University of Berne, Switzerland, 2003.
  13. Jorjeta G.Jetcheva and David B. Johson, “A Performance Comparison of On-Demand Multicast Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks,” school of computer science, computer science department, Pittsburgh, December 15, 2004
  14. U. T. Nguyen and X. Xiong, “Rate-adaptive Multicast in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks,” IEEE International Conference on Ad hocand Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications 2005 (WiMob 2005), Monreal, Canada, August 2005.
  15. Broch, J; Maltz DA, Johnson DB, Hu Y-C, and Jetcheva J. "A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols". Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking(Mobicom98), ACM, October 1998.
  16. QualNet5.0. Available. [Online]. http://www.scalable-networks.com
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANET AODV FSR ZRP QualNet version 5.0.