We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Call for Paper
December Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming December edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 November 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for a Power Transmission Industry to Vendor Selection Decisions

by Jitendra Kumar, Nirjhar Roy
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 12 - Number 11
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: Jitendra Kumar, Nirjhar Roy
10.5120/1727-2336

Jitendra Kumar, Nirjhar Roy . Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for a Power Transmission Industry to Vendor Selection Decisions. International Journal of Computer Applications. 12, 11 ( January 2011), 26-30. DOI=10.5120/1727-2336

@article{ 10.5120/1727-2336,
author = { Jitendra Kumar, Nirjhar Roy },
title = { Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for a Power Transmission Industry to Vendor Selection Decisions },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { January 2011 },
volume = { 12 },
number = { 11 },
month = { January },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 26-30 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume12/number11/1727-2336/ },
doi = { 10.5120/1727-2336 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:01:24.709022+05:30
%A Jitendra Kumar
%A Nirjhar Roy
%T Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for a Power Transmission Industry to Vendor Selection Decisions
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 12
%N 11
%P 26-30
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This work attempts to develop a rule based model, to evaluate the performance of vendors, supplying components and raw materials to a multinational organization engaged in designing, manufacturing and delivering a range of products covering various stages of electric power transmission and distribution system. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) based model, described in this work, is utilized to study the requirements of customers to select suitable vendors validate the model for ordering required components and materials for customers.

References
  1. Akarte, M. M., Surendra, N.V., Ravi, B., and Rangaraj N. 2001. Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 511-522.
  2. Boer, L. De, Van der Wegen, L., and Telgen, J. 1998. Outranking methods in support of supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 4, no. 2/3, pp.109-118.
  3. Degraeve, Z. and Roodhooft, F. 1998. Determining sourcing strategies: a decision model based on activity and cost driver information. Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 81-789.
  4. Degraeve, Z. and Roodhooft, F. 1999. Improving the efficiency of the purchasing process using total cost of ownership information: the case of heating electrodes at Cockerill Sambre S. A. European Journal of Operational Research, vol.112, no. 1, pp. 42-53.
  5. Degraeve, Z. and Roodhooft, F. 2000. A mathematical programming approach for procurement using activity based costing. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 27, no. (1-2), pp. 69-98.
  6. Dickson, G. W. 1966. A analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. J. Purch, vol. 2, pp. 5–17.
  7. Ho, W., Xu, X., and Dey, P. K. 2010. Multi - criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 202, pp.16–24.
  8. Huang, S. H. and Keskar, H. 2007. Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 510–523.
  9. Larson, G. B. 1995. An ANN pruning algorithm based approach to vendor selection. Journal of Systems Management (USA), vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 56-60.
  10. Mohammad Ebrahim, R., Razmi, J., and Haleh, H. 2009. Scatter search algorithm for supplier selection and order lot sizing under multiple price discount environment. Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 40, pp. 766-776.
  11. Muralidharan, C., Anantharaman, N., and Deshmukh, S. G. 2002. A multi-criteria group- decision making model for supplier rating. Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 22–33.
  12. Ozdemir, D., and Temur, G. T. 2009. DEA ANN approach in supplier evaluation system. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 54.
  13. Quin, L. 2009. An ANN pruning algorithm based approach to vendor selection. Kybernetes, vol. 38, 3-4, pp. 314-320.
  14. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  15. Seydel, J. 2006. Data environment analysis for decision support. Industrial Management and data systems, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 81-95.
  16. Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R. 2004. A methodology for strategic sourcing. European Journal of Operation Research, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 236–250,
  17. Timmerman, E. 1986. An approach to vendor performance evaluation. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 1, pp. 27-32.
  18. Venkata Rao, R. 2007. Supplier selection in a supply chain using analytic hierarchy process and genetic algorithm methods. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 355-369.
  19. Verma, R. and Pullman, M. E. 1998. An analysis of supplier selection process. Omega, Int. J. Mgmt. Sci., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 739–750.
  20. Wang, G., Huang, S. H., and Dismukes, J. P. 2004. Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology. International Journal of production Economics, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 1–15.
  21. Wang, H. S., and Che, Z. H. 2007. An integrated model for supplier selection decisions in configuration changes. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 32, pp. 1132–1140.
  22. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., and Desai, A. 1998. Non-cooperative negoation strategies for vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 108, pp. 208-223.
  23. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., and Desai, A. 2000. An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 90–98.
  24. Wu, T., Shunk, D. Blackhurst, J. and Appalla, R. 2007. AIDEA: A methodology for supplier evaluation and selection in a supplier – based manufacturing environment. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 174–192.
  25. Zenz, G. 1981. Purchasing and the Management of Materials. Wiley, New York.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Supply chain Optimization Vendor selection Networking method of AHP

Powered by PhDFocusTM