CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Performance Evaluation of Position-Based Routing Protocols using Different Mobility Models in MANET

by Omar Almomani, Mahmoud Al-shugran, Jafar A. Alzubi, Omar A. Alzubi
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 119 - Number 3
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Omar Almomani, Mahmoud Al-shugran, Jafar A. Alzubi, Omar A. Alzubi
10.5120/21050-3692

Omar Almomani, Mahmoud Al-shugran, Jafar A. Alzubi, Omar A. Alzubi . Performance Evaluation of Position-Based Routing Protocols using Different Mobility Models in MANET. International Journal of Computer Applications. 119, 3 ( June 2015), 43-48. DOI=10.5120/21050-3692

@article{ 10.5120/21050-3692,
author = { Omar Almomani, Mahmoud Al-shugran, Jafar A. Alzubi, Omar A. Alzubi },
title = { Performance Evaluation of Position-Based Routing Protocols using Different Mobility Models in MANET },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { June 2015 },
volume = { 119 },
number = { 3 },
month = { June },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 43-48 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume119/number3/21050-3692/ },
doi = { 10.5120/21050-3692 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:03:05.329998+05:30
%A Omar Almomani
%A Mahmoud Al-shugran
%A Jafar A. Alzubi
%A Omar A. Alzubi
%T Performance Evaluation of Position-Based Routing Protocols using Different Mobility Models in MANET
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 119
%N 3
%P 43-48
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

A Mobile Ad hoc network (MANET) is a dynamic self-organizing multi-hop wireless network. Owing the random and unpredictable movement of the mobile nodes, the topology is changing rapidly and frequently. In MANET, where is no routing infrastructure like fixed routers and routing backbones, all MNs participate in the routing process. Recently, position-aware routing protocols, and because of their simplicity, position awareness, and scalability, are the most routing protocols used with MANET. In recent years, a variety of position-aware routing protocols have been developed. The efficiency of such protocol affects by the used underlying mobility model. Thus, wrong selection of the Mobility model may has devastating consequences on the performance MANET. Research efforts haven't focused much in evaluating their performance when applied to different mobility models. In this paper, we have studied the effect of two different mobility models; Random Waypoint mobility model (RWP) and Boundless Mobility Model (BDM) on the performance of selected group of position-based routing protocols. The performance analysis was carried out by using the network simulator, Ns2. The simulation results clarify the performance of the selected routing protocols with three performance metrics.

References
  1. P. Ghosekar, et al. , "Mobile Ad hoc Networking: Imperatives and Challenges," International Journal of Computer Applications IJCA, vol. 1, pp. 153-158, 2010.
  2. A. Ambhaikar and L. Sharma, "Exploring the Behavior of Mobile Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols with Reference to Speed and Terrain Range," in Proc. of the IMECS10, 2010, pp. 798-803.
  3. C. Bettstetter, "Mobility Modeling in Wireless Networks: Categorization, Smooth Movement, and Border Effects," ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, vol. 5, pp. 55–67, 2001.
  4. T. Camp, et al. , "A Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research," Wireless communications and mobile computing, vol. 2, pp. 483-502, 2002.
  5. F. Bai, N. Sadagopan, and A. Helmy, ''Important: A framework to systematically analyze the impact of mobility on performance of routing protocols for ad hoc networks,'' in the Proc. of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2003, pp. 825-835.
  6. S. Kurkowski, et al. , "Constructing MANET Simulation Scenarios that Meet Standards," in Proc. of the MASS 007, 2007, pp. 1-9.
  7. G. G. Finn, "Routing and Addressing Problems in Large Metropolitan-Scale Internetworks," University of Southern California Marina Del Rey Information Sciences InstISI Research Report, ISU/RR-87-180, March 1987.
  8. B. Karp and H. T. Kung, "GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks," in Proc. of the sixth annual ACM MobiCom 00, 2000, pp. 243-254.
  9. R. Kumar and S. Rao, "Directional Greedy Routing Protocol (DGRP) in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks," in Information Technology, ICIT, International Conference on, 2008, pp. 183-188.
  10. J. Li and S. M. Shatz, "Toward using node mobility to enhance Greedy-forwarding in geographic routing for mobile ad hoc networks," in Proc. MODUS008, 2008, pp. 1–8.
  11. D. B. Johnson and D. A. Maltz, "Dynamic Source Routing in Ad hoc Wireless Networks," in Mobile Computing, vol. 353, 1996.
  12. Z. J. Haas, "A New Routing Protocol for the Reconfigurable Wireless Networks," In Proc of the ICUPC, 1997, pp. 562-566.
  13. C. H. Chou, et al. , "Dynamic route maintenance for geographic forwarding in mobile ad hoc networks," Computer Networks, vol. 52, pp. 418-431, 2008.
  14. B. Divecha, et al. , "Impact of Node Mobility on MANET Routing Protocols Models," Journal of Digital Information Management, vol. 5, p. 19, 2007.
  15. J. Härri, et al. , "Vehicular Mobility Simulation with VANET Mobi-Sim," Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation, vol. 87, p. 275, 2011.
  16. G. Yan, et al. , "The Role of Network and Mobility Simulators in Evaluating Vehicular Networks," in Intelligent Computing and Information Science, pp. 706-712, 2011.
  17. "The Network Simulator - ns-2," http://www. isi. edu/nsnam/ns/, 2002.
  18. C. Bettstetter, "Mobility Modeling in Wireless Networks: Categorization, Smooth Movement, and Boder Effects," ACM Mobile Computing and Communications Review (SIGMOBILE), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 55–67, Jul. 2001. [Online]. Available: http://doi. acm. org/10. 1145/584051. 584056
  19. T. Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies, "A Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research," Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing (WCMC): Special Issue On Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Research, Trends And Applications, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 483–502, Aug. 2002. [Online]. Available: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/wcm. 72
  20. J. Broch, D. A. Maltz, D. B. Johnson, Y. -C. Hu, and J. Jetcheva, "A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols," in the Preceding of the 4th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom). Dallas, Texas, USA: ACM, 25-30, Oct. 1998, pp. 85–97. [Online]. Available: http://doi. acm. org/10. 1145/288235. 288256
  21. A. Jardosh, E. M. Belding-Royer, K. C. Almeroth, and S. Suri, "Towards Realistic Mobility Models for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks," in the Preceding of the 9th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, (MobiCom). San Diego, CA, USA: ACM, 14-19, Sep. 2003, pp. 217–229. [Online]. Available: http://doi. acm. org/10. 1145/938985. 939008
  22. F. Bai, N. Sadagopan, and A. Helmy, "The IMPORTANT Framework for Analyzing the Impact of Mobility on Performance of Routing for Ad Hoc Networks," AdHoc Networks Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 383–403, Nov. 2003. [Online]. Available: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/S1570-8705(03)00040-4
  23. A. Chaintreau, P. Hui, J. Crowcroft, C. Diot, R. Gass, and J. Scott, "Impact of Human Mobility on the Design of Opportunistic Forwarding Algorithms," in the Preceding of the. 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spai, 23-29, Apr. 2006, pp. 1–13. [Online]. Available: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1109/INFOCOM. 2006. 172
  24. M. Grossglauser and D. Tse, "Mobility Increases the Capacity of Ad Hoc Wireless Networks," IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 477–486, Aug. 2002. [Online]. Available: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1109/TNET. 2002. 801403
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANET Routing Protocol Mobility Model RWP BDM

Powered by PhDFocusTM