CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

A Review: Clearing Oil Palm Plantation with Multi-Stakeholder Model

by Hamdani, Khabib Mustofa
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 115 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Hamdani, Khabib Mustofa
10.5120/20120-2181

Hamdani, Khabib Mustofa . A Review: Clearing Oil Palm Plantation with Multi-Stakeholder Model. International Journal of Computer Applications. 115, 2 ( April 2015), 1-10. DOI=10.5120/20120-2181

@article{ 10.5120/20120-2181,
author = { Hamdani, Khabib Mustofa },
title = { A Review: Clearing Oil Palm Plantation with Multi-Stakeholder Model },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { April 2015 },
volume = { 115 },
number = { 2 },
month = { April },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-10 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume115/number2/20120-2181/ },
doi = { 10.5120/20120-2181 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:53:31.865352+05:30
%A Hamdani
%A Khabib Mustofa
%T A Review: Clearing Oil Palm Plantation with Multi-Stakeholder Model
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 115
%N 2
%P 1-10
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The clearing land or clearing of oil palm plantations needs stakeholders' involvement in decision making, such as the role of government group, environmentalists, investors and the agricultural community groups from non-governmental organizations (NGO). This paper discusses about the Group Decision Support (GDS) that can be used for Oil Palm Plantation Land Clearing cases involving various stakeholders. Problem solution of Group Decision Support Clearing Oil Palm Plantation (GDS-COPP) can be categorized based on the stakeholder's model. The grouping results showed that Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods most widely used in previous papers. This paper aims to provide an overview that MCDA models and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method can be used in cases involving stakeholders in decision-making groups for plantation land clearing cases.

References
  1. M. N. A. Khalid and U. K. Yusof, "A knowledge-based expert system for the smallholder palm oil cultivator in Malaysia," IEEE Student Conf. Res. Dev. , pp. 256–261, Dec. 2012.
  2. F. Akande, K. Oriola, O. Oniya, and G. Bolaji, "Level of Oil Palm Production Mechanization in Selected Local Government Areas of Oyo and Osun States , Nigeria . ," Innov. Syst. Des. Enginneering, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 36–40, 2013.
  3. Suwondo, "Efek Pembukaan Lahan terhadap Karakteristik Biofisik Gambut pada Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di Kabupaten Bengkalis," J. Natur Indones. , vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 143–149, 2012.
  4. B. Wicke, R. Sikkema, V. Dornburg, and A. Faaij, "Exploring land use changes and the role of palm oil production in Indonesia and Malaysia," Land use policy, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 193–206, Jan. 2011.
  5. M. R. Sarmidi, H. A. El Enshasy, M. A. Hamid, N. Burg, and A. Arab, "Oil Palm?: The Rich Mine for Pharma , Food , Feed and Fuel Industries Chemical Engineering Pilot Plant ( CEPP ), Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resource Engineering , Department of Bioprocess Development , GEBRI , Mubarak City for Scientific Research ," Am. J. Agric Environ. Sci, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 767–776, 2009.
  6. USDA. 2012. United States Department of Agriculture:. 'global palm oil consumption of global palm oil production' . URL: http://www. usda. gov.
  7. BPS. 2013. Central Bureau of Statistics. Directory of Oil Palm. URL: http://www. bps. go. id.
  8. J. R. a. Butler, G. Y. Wong, D. J. Metcalfe, M. Honzák, P. L. Pert, N. Rao, M. E. van Grieken, T. Lawson, C. Bruce, F. J. Kroon, and J. E. Brodie, "An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia," Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. , vol. 180, pp. 176–191, Nov. 2013.
  9. J. M. Gonçalves, L. S. Pereira, S. X. Fang, and B. Dong, "Modelling and multicriteria analysis of water saving scenarios for an irrigation district in the upper Yellow River Basin," Agric. Water Manag. , vol. 94, no. 1–3, pp. 93–108, Dec. 2007.
  10. K. -O. Wenkel, M. Berg, W. Mirschel, R. Wieland, C. Nendel, and B. Köstner, "LandCaRe DSS--an interactive decision support system for climate change impact assessment and the analysis of potential agricultural land use adaptation strategies. ," J. Environ. Manage. , vol. 127 Suppl, pp. S168–83, Sep. 2013.
  11. P. C. Campo, F. Bousquet, and T. R. Villanueva, "Modelling with stakeholders within a development project," Environ. Model. Softw. , vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1302–1321, Nov. 2010.
  12. J. a. Recio-García, L. Quijano, and B. Díaz-Agudo, "Including social factors in an argumentative model for Group Decision Support Systems," Decis. Support Syst. , vol. 56, pp. 48–55, Dec. 2013.
  13. D. Collentine, M. Larsson, and N. Hannerz, "Exploiting decision heuristics and IT in the design of a DSS for voluntary agri-environmental programs," Ecol. Econ. , vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 303–315, Jul. 2004.
  14. O. Nekhay, M. Arriaza, and J. R. Guzmán-Álvarez, "Spatial analysis of the suitability of olive plantations for wildlife habitat restoration," Comput. Electron. Agric. , vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 49–64, Jan. 2009.
  15. R. D. Cóndor, A. Scarelli, and R. Valentini, "Multicriteria Decision Aid to support Multilateral Environmental Agreements in assessing international forestry projects," Int. Environ. Agreements Polit. Law Econ. , vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 117–137, Apr. 2010.
  16. K. P. Anagnostopoulos and C. Petalas, "A fuzzy multicriteria benefit–cost approach for irrigation projects evaluation," Agric. Water Manag. , vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 1409–1416, Jul. 2011.
  17. a. Nureize, J. Watada, and S. Wang, "Fuzzy random regression based multi-attribute evaluation and its application to oil palm fruit grading," Ann. Oper. Res. , vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 299–315, Sep. 2011.
  18. K. Devi and S. P. Yadav, "A multicriteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for plant location selection with ELECTRE method," Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. , vol. 66, no. 9–12, pp. 1219–1229, Aug. 2012.
  19. H. Kasivisvanathan, R. T. L. Ng, D. H. S. Tay, and D. K. S. Ng, "Fuzzy optimisation for retrofitting a palm oil mill into a sustainable palm oil-based integrated biorefinery," Chem. Eng. J. , vol. 200–202, pp. 694–709, Aug. 2012.
  20. A. I. Suroso and A. Ramadhan, "Web-based Decision Support System for Agribusiness Development in Oil Palm Plantations at Siak Local Government Using Policy Analysis Matrix," Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 92–98, 2012.
  21. H. Ak?nc?, A. Y. Özalp, and B. Turgut, "Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique," Comput. Electron. Agric. , vol. 97, pp. 71–82, Sep. 2013.
  22. L. Balezentiene, D. Streimikiene, and T. Balezentis, "Fuzzy decision support methodology for sustainable energy crop selection," Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. , vol. 17, pp. 83–93, Jan. 2013.
  23. J. M. Sánchez-Lozano, J. Teruel-Solano, P. L. Soto-Elvira, and M. Socorro García-Cascales, "Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain," Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. , vol. 24, pp. 544–556, Aug. 2013.
  24. S. Giri and a P. Nejadhashemi, "Application of analytical hierarchy process for effective selection of agricultural best management practices. ," J. Environ. Manage. , vol. 132, pp. 165–77, Jan. 2014.
  25. M. Sami, M. J. Shiekhdavoodi, M. Pazhohanniya, and F. Pazhohanniya, "Environmental comprehensive assessment of agricultural systems at the farm level using fuzzy logic: A case study in cane farms in Iran," Environ. Model. Softw. , vol. 58, pp. 95–108, Aug. 2014.
  26. S. Silva, L. Alçada-Almeida, and L. C. Dias, "Development of a Web-based Multi-criteria Spatial Decision Support System for the assessment of environmental sustainability of dairy farms," Comput. Electron. Agric. , vol. 108, pp. 46–57, Oct. 2014.
  27. M. D. Chavez, P. B. M. Berentsen, and A. G. J. M. O. Lansink, "Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process ( AHP ) technique," Agric. Syst. , vol. 111, pp. 53–62, 2012.
  28. D. Darshini, P. Dwivedi, and K. Glenk, "Capturing stakeholders´ views on oil palm-based biofuel and biomass utilisation in Malaysia," Energy Policy, vol. 62, pp. 1128–1137, Nov. 2013.
  29. J. L. García, a. Alvarado, J. Blanco, E. Jiménez, a. a. Maldonado, and G. Cortés, "Multi-attribute evaluation and selection of sites for agricultural product warehouses based on an Analytic Hierarchy Process," Comput. Electron. Agric. , vol. 100, pp. 60–69, Jan. 2014.
  30. T. Myllyviita, A. Holma, R. Antikainen, K. Lähtinen, and P. Leskinen, "Assessing environmental impacts of biomass production chains – application of life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)," J. Clean. Prod. , vol. 29–30, pp. 238–245, Jul. 2012.
  31. X. Delgado-Galván, J. Izquierdo, J. Benítez, and R. Pérez-García, "Joint stakeholder decision-making on the management of the Silao–Romita aquifer using AHP," Environ. Model. Softw. , vol. 51, pp. 310–322, Jan. 2014.
  32. S. Gray, A. Chan, D. Clark, and R. Jordan, "Modeling the integration of stakeholder knowledge in social–ecological decision-making: Benefits and limitations to knowledge diversity," Ecol. Modell. , vol. 229, pp. 88–96, Mar. 2012.
  33. S. a Hajkowicz, "Supporting multi-stakeholder environmental decisions. ," J. Environ. Manage. , vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 607–14, Sep. 2008.
  34. S. Irawan, L. Tacconi, and I. Ring, "Stakeholders' incentives for land-use change and REDD+: The case of Indonesia," Ecol. Econ. , vol. 87, pp. 75–83, Mar. 2013.
  35. H. Mianabadi, A. Afshar, and M. Zarghami, "Intelligent multi-stakeholder environmental management," Expert Syst. Appl. , vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 862–866, Jan. 2011.
  36. S. Missonier and S. Loufrani-Fedida, "Stakeholder analysis and engagement in projects: From stakeholder relational perspective to stakeholder relational ontology," Int. J. Proj. Manag. , vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1108–1122, Oct. 2014.
  37. A. Soltani, K. Hewage, B. Reza, and R. Sadiq, "Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: A review. ," Waste Manag. , vol. 1, Oct. 2014.
  38. E. L. Tompkins, R. Few, and K. Brown, "Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. ," J. Environ. Manage. , vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1580–92, Sep. 2008.
  39. J. Dechazal, F. Quetier, S. Lavorel, and a Vandoorn, "Including multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio-ecological systems," Glob. Environ. Chang. , vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 508–520, Aug. 2008.
  40. R. Razali and F. Anwar, "Selecting the right Stakeholders for Requirements Elicitation : A Systematic Approach," J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. , vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 250–257, 2011.
  41. Z. a Collier, M. E. Bates, M. D. Wood, and I. Linkov, "Stakeholder engagement in dredged material management decisions. ," Sci. Total Environ. , vol. 496, pp. 248–56, Oct. 2014.
  42. L. Abdullah, "Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making and its Applications: A Brief Review of Category," Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. , vol. 97, pp. 131–136, Nov. 2013.
  43. C. Carlsson and R. Fullér, "Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making: Recent developments," Fuzzy Sets Syst. , vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 139–153, Mar. 1996.
  44. F. T. S. Chan, H. K. Chan, and A. Kazerooni, "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Technique for Evaluation of Scheduling Rules," pp. 103–113, 2002.
  45. W. F. A. El-wahed, "Intelligent Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making : Review and Analysis," vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–51, 2008.
  46. C. Kahraman, "Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making," vol. 16, pp. 1–18, 2008.
  47. R. R. Yager, "Uncertainty modeling and decision support," Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. , vol. 85, no. 1–3, pp. 341–354, Jul. 2004.
  48. P. Meyer and A. -L. Olteanu, "Formalizing and solving the problem of clustering in MCDA," Eur. J. Oper. Res. , vol. 227, no. 3, pp. 494–502, Jun. 2013.
  49. G. De Feo and S. De Gisi, "Using MCDA and GIS for hazardous waste landfill siting considering land scarcity for waste disposal. ," Waste Manag. , vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 2225–38, Nov. 2014.
  50. R. Mateus, J. a. Ferreira, and J. Carreira, "Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA): Central Porto high-speed railway station," Eur. J. Oper. Res. , vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 1–18, May 2008.
  51. S. P. Gbanie, P. B. Tengbe, J. S. Momoh, J. Medo, and V. T. S. Kabba, "Modelling landfill location using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): Case study Bo, Southern Sierra Leone," Appl. Geogr. , vol. 36, pp. 3–12, Jan. 2013.
  52. T. L. Saaty and M. Ozdemir, "Negative Priorities in the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Math. Comput. Model. , vol. 37, no. 9–10, pp. 1063–1075, 2003.
  53. T. L. Saaty, K. Peniwati, and J. S. Shang, "The analytic hierarchy process and human resource allocation: Half the story," Math. Comput. Model. , vol. 46, no. 7–8, pp. 1041–1053, Oct. 2007.
  54. T. L. Saaty, "The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used," Math. Model. , vol. 9, no. 3–5, pp. 161–176, 1987.
  55. I. Basak and T. L. Saaty, "Group Decision Making Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process," Math. Comput. Model. , vol. 17, no. 4–5, pp. 101–109, 1993.
  56. T. L. Saaty, "Rank from comparisons and from ratingsin the analytic hierarchy/network processes ," European Journal of Operational Research. , vol. 168, pp. 557–570, 2006.
  57. B. Roy, "The Outrangking Foundations Approach and the methods," pp. 49–73, 1991.
  58. L. Botti and N. Peypoch, "Multi-criteria ELECTRE method and destination competitiveness," Tour. Manag. Perspect. , vol. 6, pp. 108–113, Apr. 2013.
  59. A. Hatami-Marbini and M. Tavana, "An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment," Omega, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 373–386, Aug. 2011.
  60. M. -C. Wu and T. -Y. Chen, "The ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach based on Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets," Expert Syst. Appl. , vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 12318–12327, Sep. 2011.
  61. A. Baležentis, T. Baležentis, and W. K. M. Brauers, "Personnel selection based on computing with words and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Expert Syst. Appl. , vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 7961–7967, Jul. 2012.
  62. C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
  63. D. L. Olson, "Comparison of Weights in TOPSIS Models," vol. 40, pp. 721–727, 2004.
  64. S. Kusumadewi, S. Hartati, A. Harjoko, and R. Wardoyo, Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Making, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu Press, 2006, p. 1361.
  65. A. Afshar, M. a. Mariño, M. Saadatpour, and A. Afshar, "Fuzzy TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Applied to Karun Reservoirs System," Water Resour. Manag. , vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 545–563, Oct. 2010.
  66. A. Zerger, G. Warren, P. Hill, D. Robertson, a. Weidemann, and K. Lawton, "Multi-criteria assessment for linking regional conservation planning and farm-scale actions," Environ. Model. Softw. , vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 103–110, Jan. 2011.
  67. C. Pita, G. J. Pierce, and I. Theodossiou, "Stakeholders' participation in the fisheries management decision-making process: Fishers' perceptions of participation," Mar. Policy, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1093–1102, Sep. 2010.
  68. V. B. S. Silva, D. C. Morais, and A. T. Almeida, "A Multicriteria Group Decision Model to Support Watershed Committees in Brazil," Water Resour. Manag. , vol. 24, no. 14, pp. 4075–4091, May 2010.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Oil Palm Plantation Multi-stakeholder Group Decision Support.

Powered by PhDFocusTM